THE USE OF CRANIAL HALO TRACTION VERSUS TEMPORARY INTERNAL DISTRACTION IN STAGED SURGERY FOR SEVERE SCOLIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,José Alberto Alves
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Paiva,Antônio Cardoso, Afonso,Pedro Paschoal Cassapis Cardoso, Almeida,Paulo Cesar, Visconti,Rogério dos Reis, Meireles,Ricardo de Souza Portes
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000400254
• topic: Scoliosis; Traction; Spinal Fusion

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine which method is more effective – cranial halo traction or temporary internal distraction – in staged surgeries for patients with severe (≥ 100°) and stiff (<25% flexibility) scoliosis. Methods: A sample of 12 patients with traction and 7 patients without traction, operated on between January 2013 and December 2017. The patients’ demographic data, the type of surgery performed, complications, and coronal and sagittal alignment parameters were recorded before surgery and in the final follow-up. The data were processed in SPSS 20.0. Comparisons were made between the means (Student's t-test) and the clinical and procedure-related characteristics (likelihood ratio and Fisher's Exact tests), at a confidence level of 0.05. Results: There were no significant intergroup differences for clinical characteristics, complications or degree of correction. However, more patients in the group submitted to temporary internal distraction required vertebral resection osteotomies during definitive surgery (p<0.05). Conclusions: Based on the results, it was not possible to establish which is the most effective method, but it is suggested that staged traction may be more effective, and safer, particularly when the surgeon is less experienced, during surgery on patients with severe and stiff scoliosis. Level of evidence IV; Vase series.