Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Daniel De Abreu
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Rosa,Márcio Guglielmi, Machado,Wilson De Jesus, Falcon,Roberto Sakamoto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000200124
Resumo: Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in laborers who have undergone open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Methods: 78 patients were submitted to lumbar arthrodesis by the same two spine surgeons partners from January 2008 to December 2012. Forty-one were submitted to traditional open arthrodesis and 37 to the minimally invasive procedure. Three patients were not included because they had already retired from work. The analyzed variables were length of hospitalization, length of follow-up, type of access (TILF or MIS TLIF), need for blood transfusion, percentage of improvement or worsening after surgery, pre- and postoperative VAS scale, time off work, pre-and postoperative Oswestry disability index, and general aspects of the laborers such as age, education, profession, working time, amount of daily weight carried at work, and use or not of personal protective equipment. Results: Time off work was longer in the TLIF group (average of 9.84 months) compared with the MIS TLIF group (average of 3.20 months). Significant improvement in postoperative VAS and Oswestry was achieved in both groups. Average length of hospitalization was 5.73 days for the TLIF group and 2.76 days for the MIS TLIF group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion presents similar results when compared to open TLIF, but has the benefits of less postoperative morbidity, shorter hospitalization times, and faster rehabilitation in laborer patients.
id SBCO-1_1df839d50d07a0f7a5b95516e1a27e6d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512014000200124
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborersArthrodesisLumbar vertebraeSpinal fusionMinimally invasive surgical proceduresOccupational healthObjective: To compare clinical outcomes in laborers who have undergone open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Methods: 78 patients were submitted to lumbar arthrodesis by the same two spine surgeons partners from January 2008 to December 2012. Forty-one were submitted to traditional open arthrodesis and 37 to the minimally invasive procedure. Three patients were not included because they had already retired from work. The analyzed variables were length of hospitalization, length of follow-up, type of access (TILF or MIS TLIF), need for blood transfusion, percentage of improvement or worsening after surgery, pre- and postoperative VAS scale, time off work, pre-and postoperative Oswestry disability index, and general aspects of the laborers such as age, education, profession, working time, amount of daily weight carried at work, and use or not of personal protective equipment. Results: Time off work was longer in the TLIF group (average of 9.84 months) compared with the MIS TLIF group (average of 3.20 months). Significant improvement in postoperative VAS and Oswestry was achieved in both groups. Average length of hospitalization was 5.73 days for the TLIF group and 2.76 days for the MIS TLIF group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion presents similar results when compared to open TLIF, but has the benefits of less postoperative morbidity, shorter hospitalization times, and faster rehabilitation in laborer patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000200124Coluna/Columna v.13 n.2 2014reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/S1808-18512014130200337info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Daniel De AbreuRosa,Márcio GuglielmiMachado,Wilson De JesusFalcon,Roberto Sakamotoeng2015-08-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512014000200124Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2015-08-18T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
title Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
spellingShingle Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
Oliveira,Daniel De Abreu
Arthrodesis
Lumbar vertebrae
Spinal fusion
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Occupational health
title_short Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
title_full Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
title_fullStr Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
title_sort Comparison of the results of MIS-TLIF and open TLIF techniques in laborers
author Oliveira,Daniel De Abreu
author_facet Oliveira,Daniel De Abreu
Rosa,Márcio Guglielmi
Machado,Wilson De Jesus
Falcon,Roberto Sakamoto
author_role author
author2 Rosa,Márcio Guglielmi
Machado,Wilson De Jesus
Falcon,Roberto Sakamoto
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Daniel De Abreu
Rosa,Márcio Guglielmi
Machado,Wilson De Jesus
Falcon,Roberto Sakamoto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arthrodesis
Lumbar vertebrae
Spinal fusion
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Occupational health
topic Arthrodesis
Lumbar vertebrae
Spinal fusion
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Occupational health
description Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in laborers who have undergone open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Methods: 78 patients were submitted to lumbar arthrodesis by the same two spine surgeons partners from January 2008 to December 2012. Forty-one were submitted to traditional open arthrodesis and 37 to the minimally invasive procedure. Three patients were not included because they had already retired from work. The analyzed variables were length of hospitalization, length of follow-up, type of access (TILF or MIS TLIF), need for blood transfusion, percentage of improvement or worsening after surgery, pre- and postoperative VAS scale, time off work, pre-and postoperative Oswestry disability index, and general aspects of the laborers such as age, education, profession, working time, amount of daily weight carried at work, and use or not of personal protective equipment. Results: Time off work was longer in the TLIF group (average of 9.84 months) compared with the MIS TLIF group (average of 3.20 months). Significant improvement in postoperative VAS and Oswestry was achieved in both groups. Average length of hospitalization was 5.73 days for the TLIF group and 2.76 days for the MIS TLIF group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion presents similar results when compared to open TLIF, but has the benefits of less postoperative morbidity, shorter hospitalization times, and faster rehabilitation in laborer patients.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000200124
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000200124
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1808-18512014130200337
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.13 n.2 2014
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126614692429824