IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Coluna/Columna |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200201 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the immediate effect of amplitude modulation frequencies (AMFs) of 4kHz interferential current (IFC) on chronic low back pain (CLBP). Method: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty-three subjects with CLBP were recruited. The subjects were randomized into 3 groups: the placebo group (PG, n=21) and 2 intervention groups (IG), IG4kHz/2Hz (n=21) and IG4kHz/100Hz (n=21). All groups were submitted to a single session of 30 minutes. Pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and pressure algometry. Flexibility was evaluated using the Modified Schober Test (MST), the Sit-and-Reach Test (SRT), the Fingertip-to-Floor Test (FTF), and the Passive Straight-Leg Raise Test (PSLR). Results: Comparing IG4kHz/100Hz with PG, we found a significant difference (p<0.05) in NRS in the total and in the MPQ categories, whereas in the comparison between IG4kHz/2Hz and PG, we found a significant difference only in the sensory and evaluative categories of MPQ. Regarding the flexibility tests, we observed a significant difference of both IG4kHz/100Hz and IG4kHz/2Hz in comparison to PG in MST and PSLR, and of IG4kHz/2Hz in comparison to PG in SRT. The 4kHz IFC was effective in immediately reducing CLBP and, consequently, in increasing the flexibility of the lumbar spine and lower limbs. Conclusion: Conclusion: There was a greater number of significant positive outcomes when the 100Hz AMF was adopted. Level of Evidence I; High quality randomized clinical trial with or without statistically significant differences, but with narrow confidence intervals. |
id |
SBCO-1_3524d490e015489ec7b4ac97e9446d4e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-18512022000200201 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCO-1 |
network_name_str |
Coluna/Columna |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAINTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve StimulationLow Back PainPain MeasurementABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the immediate effect of amplitude modulation frequencies (AMFs) of 4kHz interferential current (IFC) on chronic low back pain (CLBP). Method: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty-three subjects with CLBP were recruited. The subjects were randomized into 3 groups: the placebo group (PG, n=21) and 2 intervention groups (IG), IG4kHz/2Hz (n=21) and IG4kHz/100Hz (n=21). All groups were submitted to a single session of 30 minutes. Pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and pressure algometry. Flexibility was evaluated using the Modified Schober Test (MST), the Sit-and-Reach Test (SRT), the Fingertip-to-Floor Test (FTF), and the Passive Straight-Leg Raise Test (PSLR). Results: Comparing IG4kHz/100Hz with PG, we found a significant difference (p<0.05) in NRS in the total and in the MPQ categories, whereas in the comparison between IG4kHz/2Hz and PG, we found a significant difference only in the sensory and evaluative categories of MPQ. Regarding the flexibility tests, we observed a significant difference of both IG4kHz/100Hz and IG4kHz/2Hz in comparison to PG in MST and PSLR, and of IG4kHz/2Hz in comparison to PG in SRT. The 4kHz IFC was effective in immediately reducing CLBP and, consequently, in increasing the flexibility of the lumbar spine and lower limbs. Conclusion: Conclusion: There was a greater number of significant positive outcomes when the 100Hz AMF was adopted. Level of Evidence I; High quality randomized clinical trial with or without statistically significant differences, but with narrow confidence intervals.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200201Coluna/Columna v.21 n.2 2022reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120222102253908info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessALMEIDA,NICOLEPALADINI,LUIS HENRIQUEDIAS,LUCAS VINICIUSSALES,RAMON SCHMIDT DEMACEDO,ANA CAROLINA BRANDT DEeng2022-06-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512022000200201Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2022-06-29T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN |
title |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN |
spellingShingle |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN ALMEIDA,NICOLE Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Low Back Pain Pain Measurement |
title_short |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN |
title_full |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN |
title_fullStr |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN |
title_full_unstemmed |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN |
title_sort |
IMMEDIATE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF 4KHZ AMFS INTERFERENTIAL CURRENT ON CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN |
author |
ALMEIDA,NICOLE |
author_facet |
ALMEIDA,NICOLE PALADINI,LUIS HENRIQUE DIAS,LUCAS VINICIUS SALES,RAMON SCHMIDT DE MACEDO,ANA CAROLINA BRANDT DE |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
PALADINI,LUIS HENRIQUE DIAS,LUCAS VINICIUS SALES,RAMON SCHMIDT DE MACEDO,ANA CAROLINA BRANDT DE |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ALMEIDA,NICOLE PALADINI,LUIS HENRIQUE DIAS,LUCAS VINICIUS SALES,RAMON SCHMIDT DE MACEDO,ANA CAROLINA BRANDT DE |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Low Back Pain Pain Measurement |
topic |
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Low Back Pain Pain Measurement |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the immediate effect of amplitude modulation frequencies (AMFs) of 4kHz interferential current (IFC) on chronic low back pain (CLBP). Method: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty-three subjects with CLBP were recruited. The subjects were randomized into 3 groups: the placebo group (PG, n=21) and 2 intervention groups (IG), IG4kHz/2Hz (n=21) and IG4kHz/100Hz (n=21). All groups were submitted to a single session of 30 minutes. Pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and pressure algometry. Flexibility was evaluated using the Modified Schober Test (MST), the Sit-and-Reach Test (SRT), the Fingertip-to-Floor Test (FTF), and the Passive Straight-Leg Raise Test (PSLR). Results: Comparing IG4kHz/100Hz with PG, we found a significant difference (p<0.05) in NRS in the total and in the MPQ categories, whereas in the comparison between IG4kHz/2Hz and PG, we found a significant difference only in the sensory and evaluative categories of MPQ. Regarding the flexibility tests, we observed a significant difference of both IG4kHz/100Hz and IG4kHz/2Hz in comparison to PG in MST and PSLR, and of IG4kHz/2Hz in comparison to PG in SRT. The 4kHz IFC was effective in immediately reducing CLBP and, consequently, in increasing the flexibility of the lumbar spine and lower limbs. Conclusion: Conclusion: There was a greater number of significant positive outcomes when the 100Hz AMF was adopted. Level of Evidence I; High quality randomized clinical trial with or without statistically significant differences, but with narrow confidence intervals. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200201 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200201 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1808-185120222102253908 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna v.21 n.2 2022 reponame:Coluna/Columna instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) instacron:SBCO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
instacron_str |
SBCO |
institution |
SBCO |
reponame_str |
Coluna/Columna |
collection |
Coluna/Columna |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126616756027392 |