IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MARCHI,LUIS
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: PIMENTA,LUIZ, AMARAL,RODRIGO, FORTTI,FERNANDA, NOGUEIRA-NETO,JOES, OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO, JENSEN,RUBENS, COUTINHO,ETEVALDO, ABDALA,NITAMAR
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300226
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the factors related to the non-occurrence of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Methods: Case-control study of single level standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) including 86 cases. Patients without cage subsidence composed the control group (C), while those in the subsidence group (S) developed cage subsidence. Preoperative data were examined to create a risk score based on correlation factors with S group. The proven risk factors were part of an evaluation score. Results: Of the 86 cases included, 72 were in group C and 14 in group S. The following risk factors were more prevalent in group S compared to C group: spondylolisthesis (93% vs 18%; p<0.001); scoliosis (31% vs 12%; p=0.033); women (79% vs 38%; p=0.007); older patients (average 57.0 vs 68.4 years; p=0.001). These risk factors were used in a score (0-4) to evaluate the risk in each case. The patients with higher risk scores had greater subsidence (p<0.001). Scores ≥2 were predictive of subsidence with 92% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Conclusions: It was possible to correlate the degree of subsidence in standalone LLIF procedures using demographic (age and gender) and pathological (spondylolisthesis and scoliosis) data. With a score based on risk factors and considering any score <2, the probability of non-occurrence of subsidence following standalone LLIF (negative predictive value) was 98%.
id SBCO-1_39ed473470f670cde1bfcfcf07fa4291
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512016000300226
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?SpineLumbar vertebraeSpinal fusionComplicationsRisk factorsPatient selectionABSTRACT Objective: To identify the factors related to the non-occurrence of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Methods: Case-control study of single level standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) including 86 cases. Patients without cage subsidence composed the control group (C), while those in the subsidence group (S) developed cage subsidence. Preoperative data were examined to create a risk score based on correlation factors with S group. The proven risk factors were part of an evaluation score. Results: Of the 86 cases included, 72 were in group C and 14 in group S. The following risk factors were more prevalent in group S compared to C group: spondylolisthesis (93% vs 18%; p<0.001); scoliosis (31% vs 12%; p=0.033); women (79% vs 38%; p=0.007); older patients (average 57.0 vs 68.4 years; p=0.001). These risk factors were used in a score (0-4) to evaluate the risk in each case. The patients with higher risk scores had greater subsidence (p<0.001). Scores ≥2 were predictive of subsidence with 92% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Conclusions: It was possible to correlate the degree of subsidence in standalone LLIF procedures using demographic (age and gender) and pathological (spondylolisthesis and scoliosis) data. With a score based on risk factors and considering any score <2, the probability of non-occurrence of subsidence following standalone LLIF (negative predictive value) was 98%.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300226Coluna/Columna v.15 n.3 2016reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/S1808-185120161503162720info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMARCHI,LUISPIMENTA,LUIZAMARAL,RODRIGOFORTTI,FERNANDANOGUEIRA-NETO,JOESOLIVEIRA,LEONARDOJENSEN,RUBENSCOUTINHO,ETEVALDOABDALA,NITAMAReng2016-09-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512016000300226Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2016-09-23T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
title IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
spellingShingle IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
MARCHI,LUIS
Spine
Lumbar vertebrae
Spinal fusion
Complications
Risk factors
Patient selection
title_short IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
title_full IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
title_fullStr IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
title_full_unstemmed IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
title_sort IN WHICH PATIENTS IS IT POSSIBLE TO PERFORM STANDALONE LATERAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITHOUT CAGE SUBSIDENCE?
author MARCHI,LUIS
author_facet MARCHI,LUIS
PIMENTA,LUIZ
AMARAL,RODRIGO
FORTTI,FERNANDA
NOGUEIRA-NETO,JOES
OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO
JENSEN,RUBENS
COUTINHO,ETEVALDO
ABDALA,NITAMAR
author_role author
author2 PIMENTA,LUIZ
AMARAL,RODRIGO
FORTTI,FERNANDA
NOGUEIRA-NETO,JOES
OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO
JENSEN,RUBENS
COUTINHO,ETEVALDO
ABDALA,NITAMAR
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MARCHI,LUIS
PIMENTA,LUIZ
AMARAL,RODRIGO
FORTTI,FERNANDA
NOGUEIRA-NETO,JOES
OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO
JENSEN,RUBENS
COUTINHO,ETEVALDO
ABDALA,NITAMAR
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spine
Lumbar vertebrae
Spinal fusion
Complications
Risk factors
Patient selection
topic Spine
Lumbar vertebrae
Spinal fusion
Complications
Risk factors
Patient selection
description ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the factors related to the non-occurrence of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Methods: Case-control study of single level standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) including 86 cases. Patients without cage subsidence composed the control group (C), while those in the subsidence group (S) developed cage subsidence. Preoperative data were examined to create a risk score based on correlation factors with S group. The proven risk factors were part of an evaluation score. Results: Of the 86 cases included, 72 were in group C and 14 in group S. The following risk factors were more prevalent in group S compared to C group: spondylolisthesis (93% vs 18%; p<0.001); scoliosis (31% vs 12%; p=0.033); women (79% vs 38%; p=0.007); older patients (average 57.0 vs 68.4 years; p=0.001). These risk factors were used in a score (0-4) to evaluate the risk in each case. The patients with higher risk scores had greater subsidence (p<0.001). Scores ≥2 were predictive of subsidence with 92% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Conclusions: It was possible to correlate the degree of subsidence in standalone LLIF procedures using demographic (age and gender) and pathological (spondylolisthesis and scoliosis) data. With a score based on risk factors and considering any score <2, the probability of non-occurrence of subsidence following standalone LLIF (negative predictive value) was 98%.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300226
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300226
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1808-185120161503162720
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.15 n.3 2016
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615198892032