IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA, PIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDA, ROMERO,VALERIA, DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective Evaluate and compare the mechanical resistance and the fatigue behavior associated with the use of three different modalities of vertebral fixation system rod connectors through in vitro pre-clinical mechanical tests developed specifically for this application (linear, lateral with square connector and lateral with oblique connector). Methods Cobalt chromium rods 5.5 mm in diameter were used and coupled with three types of connectors: a) side rod with oblique connector, b) side rod with square connector, and c) rod and linear connectors. Quasi-static mechanical four-point bending and fatigue tests were performed. The variables measured were (I) the bending moment at the yield limit, (II) the displacement at the yield limit, (III) the rigidity of the system in flexion and (IV) the number of cycles until system failure. Results The linear system presented the greatest force and the greatest moment at the yield limit, as well as the greatest stiffness equivalent to bending. All specimens with square and oblique connectors endured 2.5 million cycles in the minimum and maximum conditions of applied moment. The specimens with linear connector endured 2.5 million cycles with fractions of 40.14% of the bending moment at the yield limit, but failed with levels of 60.17% and 80.27%. Conclusions Systems with linear connectors showed greater mechanical resistance when compared to systems with square and oblique connectors. All systems supported cyclic loads that mimic in vivo demands. Level of evidence V; In vitro research.
id SBCO-1_4df6067262fd8360c304bf8e2643af16
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512021000300156
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORSSpinal FusionEssayExperimental ImplantsArthrodesisABSTRACT Objective Evaluate and compare the mechanical resistance and the fatigue behavior associated with the use of three different modalities of vertebral fixation system rod connectors through in vitro pre-clinical mechanical tests developed specifically for this application (linear, lateral with square connector and lateral with oblique connector). Methods Cobalt chromium rods 5.5 mm in diameter were used and coupled with three types of connectors: a) side rod with oblique connector, b) side rod with square connector, and c) rod and linear connectors. Quasi-static mechanical four-point bending and fatigue tests were performed. The variables measured were (I) the bending moment at the yield limit, (II) the displacement at the yield limit, (III) the rigidity of the system in flexion and (IV) the number of cycles until system failure. Results The linear system presented the greatest force and the greatest moment at the yield limit, as well as the greatest stiffness equivalent to bending. All specimens with square and oblique connectors endured 2.5 million cycles in the minimum and maximum conditions of applied moment. The specimens with linear connector endured 2.5 million cycles with fractions of 40.14% of the bending moment at the yield limit, but failed with levels of 60.17% and 80.27%. Conclusions Systems with linear connectors showed greater mechanical resistance when compared to systems with square and oblique connectors. All systems supported cyclic loads that mimic in vivo demands. Level of evidence V; In vitro research.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156Coluna/Columna v.20 n.3 2021reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120212003245449info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLOPINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZAPIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDAROMERO,VALERIADEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDOeng2021-09-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512021000300156Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2021-09-09T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
title IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
spellingShingle IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO
Spinal Fusion
Essay
Experimental Implants
Arthrodesis
title_short IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
title_full IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
title_fullStr IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
title_full_unstemmed IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
title_sort IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
author ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO
author_facet ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO
PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA
PIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDA
ROMERO,VALERIA
DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO
author_role author
author2 PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA
PIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDA
ROMERO,VALERIA
DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO
PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA
PIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDA
ROMERO,VALERIA
DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spinal Fusion
Essay
Experimental Implants
Arthrodesis
topic Spinal Fusion
Essay
Experimental Implants
Arthrodesis
description ABSTRACT Objective Evaluate and compare the mechanical resistance and the fatigue behavior associated with the use of three different modalities of vertebral fixation system rod connectors through in vitro pre-clinical mechanical tests developed specifically for this application (linear, lateral with square connector and lateral with oblique connector). Methods Cobalt chromium rods 5.5 mm in diameter were used and coupled with three types of connectors: a) side rod with oblique connector, b) side rod with square connector, and c) rod and linear connectors. Quasi-static mechanical four-point bending and fatigue tests were performed. The variables measured were (I) the bending moment at the yield limit, (II) the displacement at the yield limit, (III) the rigidity of the system in flexion and (IV) the number of cycles until system failure. Results The linear system presented the greatest force and the greatest moment at the yield limit, as well as the greatest stiffness equivalent to bending. All specimens with square and oblique connectors endured 2.5 million cycles in the minimum and maximum conditions of applied moment. The specimens with linear connector endured 2.5 million cycles with fractions of 40.14% of the bending moment at the yield limit, but failed with levels of 60.17% and 80.27%. Conclusions Systems with linear connectors showed greater mechanical resistance when compared to systems with square and oblique connectors. All systems supported cyclic loads that mimic in vivo demands. Level of evidence V; In vitro research.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120212003245449
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.20 n.3 2021
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126616491786240