IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Coluna/Columna |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective Evaluate and compare the mechanical resistance and the fatigue behavior associated with the use of three different modalities of vertebral fixation system rod connectors through in vitro pre-clinical mechanical tests developed specifically for this application (linear, lateral with square connector and lateral with oblique connector). Methods Cobalt chromium rods 5.5 mm in diameter were used and coupled with three types of connectors: a) side rod with oblique connector, b) side rod with square connector, and c) rod and linear connectors. Quasi-static mechanical four-point bending and fatigue tests were performed. The variables measured were (I) the bending moment at the yield limit, (II) the displacement at the yield limit, (III) the rigidity of the system in flexion and (IV) the number of cycles until system failure. Results The linear system presented the greatest force and the greatest moment at the yield limit, as well as the greatest stiffness equivalent to bending. All specimens with square and oblique connectors endured 2.5 million cycles in the minimum and maximum conditions of applied moment. The specimens with linear connector endured 2.5 million cycles with fractions of 40.14% of the bending moment at the yield limit, but failed with levels of 60.17% and 80.27%. Conclusions Systems with linear connectors showed greater mechanical resistance when compared to systems with square and oblique connectors. All systems supported cyclic loads that mimic in vivo demands. Level of evidence V; In vitro research. |
id |
SBCO-1_4df6067262fd8360c304bf8e2643af16 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-18512021000300156 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCO-1 |
network_name_str |
Coluna/Columna |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORSSpinal FusionEssayExperimental ImplantsArthrodesisABSTRACT Objective Evaluate and compare the mechanical resistance and the fatigue behavior associated with the use of three different modalities of vertebral fixation system rod connectors through in vitro pre-clinical mechanical tests developed specifically for this application (linear, lateral with square connector and lateral with oblique connector). Methods Cobalt chromium rods 5.5 mm in diameter were used and coupled with three types of connectors: a) side rod with oblique connector, b) side rod with square connector, and c) rod and linear connectors. Quasi-static mechanical four-point bending and fatigue tests were performed. The variables measured were (I) the bending moment at the yield limit, (II) the displacement at the yield limit, (III) the rigidity of the system in flexion and (IV) the number of cycles until system failure. Results The linear system presented the greatest force and the greatest moment at the yield limit, as well as the greatest stiffness equivalent to bending. All specimens with square and oblique connectors endured 2.5 million cycles in the minimum and maximum conditions of applied moment. The specimens with linear connector endured 2.5 million cycles with fractions of 40.14% of the bending moment at the yield limit, but failed with levels of 60.17% and 80.27%. Conclusions Systems with linear connectors showed greater mechanical resistance when compared to systems with square and oblique connectors. All systems supported cyclic loads that mimic in vivo demands. Level of evidence V; In vitro research.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156Coluna/Columna v.20 n.3 2021reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120212003245449info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLOPINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZAPIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDAROMERO,VALERIADEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDOeng2021-09-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512021000300156Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2021-09-09T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS |
title |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS |
spellingShingle |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO Spinal Fusion Essay Experimental Implants Arthrodesis |
title_short |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS |
title_full |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS |
title_fullStr |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS |
title_full_unstemmed |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS |
title_sort |
IN VITRO MECHANICAL EVALUATION OF SPINAL FIXATION ROD CONNECTORS |
author |
ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO |
author_facet |
ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA PIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDA ROMERO,VALERIA DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA PIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDA ROMERO,VALERIA DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ROESLER,CARLOS RODRIGO DE MELLO PINHEIRO,RÔMULO PEDROZA PIZZOLATTI,ANDRÉ LUÍS ALMEIDA ROMERO,VALERIA DEFINO,HELTON LUIZ APARECIDO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spinal Fusion Essay Experimental Implants Arthrodesis |
topic |
Spinal Fusion Essay Experimental Implants Arthrodesis |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective Evaluate and compare the mechanical resistance and the fatigue behavior associated with the use of three different modalities of vertebral fixation system rod connectors through in vitro pre-clinical mechanical tests developed specifically for this application (linear, lateral with square connector and lateral with oblique connector). Methods Cobalt chromium rods 5.5 mm in diameter were used and coupled with three types of connectors: a) side rod with oblique connector, b) side rod with square connector, and c) rod and linear connectors. Quasi-static mechanical four-point bending and fatigue tests were performed. The variables measured were (I) the bending moment at the yield limit, (II) the displacement at the yield limit, (III) the rigidity of the system in flexion and (IV) the number of cycles until system failure. Results The linear system presented the greatest force and the greatest moment at the yield limit, as well as the greatest stiffness equivalent to bending. All specimens with square and oblique connectors endured 2.5 million cycles in the minimum and maximum conditions of applied moment. The specimens with linear connector endured 2.5 million cycles with fractions of 40.14% of the bending moment at the yield limit, but failed with levels of 60.17% and 80.27%. Conclusions Systems with linear connectors showed greater mechanical resistance when compared to systems with square and oblique connectors. All systems supported cyclic loads that mimic in vivo demands. Level of evidence V; In vitro research. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000300156 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1808-185120212003245449 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna v.20 n.3 2021 reponame:Coluna/Columna instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) instacron:SBCO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
instacron_str |
SBCO |
institution |
SBCO |
reponame_str |
Coluna/Columna |
collection |
Coluna/Columna |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126616491786240 |