MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Coluna/Columna |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000400274 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: This study describes the use of materials for modern cervical instrumentation, evaluating its viability in children and adolescents, and the techniques used in different cases. The efficacy of the techniques was analyzed through improvement of pain, maintenance of cervical range of motion, recovery of craniocervical stability, bone consolidation, and spinal stenosis in the postoperative follow-up. Method: Retrospective study of the clinical and radiological parameters of 27 patients aged two to 16 years with cervical spine diseases. Results: Two patients had chronic dislocation in C1-C2, one had congenital axis spondylolisthesis, two had congenital dislocation in C1-C2, three had tumors, one had kyphosis after laminectomy, one had post-infection kyphosis, one had fracture, 11 were syndromic with instabilities, and five had congenital cervical scoliosis. As to surgical approaches, two patients were transorally operated, three by anterior approach, 15 by posterior approach, two by anterior and posterior approaches, and five were treated in three stages (anterior, posterior and anterior approaches). Regarding the technique of cervical stabilization, seven patients were treated by Goel-Harms technique, two received Goel’s facet distraction, and three, Wright translaminar screws. There were complications in four cases. Two patients in the instrumentation of C1 lateral mass due to poor positioning, one with cerebrospinal fluid fistula and one with surgical wound infection. Conclusion: Modern cervical instrumentation in pediatric patients is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of cervical instability. |
id |
SBCO-1_58faf0a591d1f365ce04c2efa1a0696c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-18512017000400274 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCO-1 |
network_name_str |
Coluna/Columna |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENTSpinePediatricsInstrumentationABSTRACT Objective: This study describes the use of materials for modern cervical instrumentation, evaluating its viability in children and adolescents, and the techniques used in different cases. The efficacy of the techniques was analyzed through improvement of pain, maintenance of cervical range of motion, recovery of craniocervical stability, bone consolidation, and spinal stenosis in the postoperative follow-up. Method: Retrospective study of the clinical and radiological parameters of 27 patients aged two to 16 years with cervical spine diseases. Results: Two patients had chronic dislocation in C1-C2, one had congenital axis spondylolisthesis, two had congenital dislocation in C1-C2, three had tumors, one had kyphosis after laminectomy, one had post-infection kyphosis, one had fracture, 11 were syndromic with instabilities, and five had congenital cervical scoliosis. As to surgical approaches, two patients were transorally operated, three by anterior approach, 15 by posterior approach, two by anterior and posterior approaches, and five were treated in three stages (anterior, posterior and anterior approaches). Regarding the technique of cervical stabilization, seven patients were treated by Goel-Harms technique, two received Goel’s facet distraction, and three, Wright translaminar screws. There were complications in four cases. Two patients in the instrumentation of C1 lateral mass due to poor positioning, one with cerebrospinal fluid fistula and one with surgical wound infection. Conclusion: Modern cervical instrumentation in pediatric patients is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of cervical instability.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000400274Coluna/Columna v.16 n.4 2017reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120171604179210info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAires,Ayrana SoaresSilva,Luís Eduardo Carelli Teixeira daBarros,Alderico Girão Campos deAzevedo,Gustavo Borges Laurindo deNaves,Cleiton Diaseng2018-06-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512017000400274Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2018-06-28T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT |
title |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT |
spellingShingle |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT Aires,Ayrana Soares Spine Pediatrics Instrumentation |
title_short |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT |
title_full |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT |
title_fullStr |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT |
title_full_unstemmed |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT |
title_sort |
MODERN TECHNIQUES OF CERVICAL INSTRUMENTATION IN IMMATURE SKELETON: VIABILITY ASSESSMENT |
author |
Aires,Ayrana Soares |
author_facet |
Aires,Ayrana Soares Silva,Luís Eduardo Carelli Teixeira da Barros,Alderico Girão Campos de Azevedo,Gustavo Borges Laurindo de Naves,Cleiton Dias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Luís Eduardo Carelli Teixeira da Barros,Alderico Girão Campos de Azevedo,Gustavo Borges Laurindo de Naves,Cleiton Dias |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aires,Ayrana Soares Silva,Luís Eduardo Carelli Teixeira da Barros,Alderico Girão Campos de Azevedo,Gustavo Borges Laurindo de Naves,Cleiton Dias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spine Pediatrics Instrumentation |
topic |
Spine Pediatrics Instrumentation |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: This study describes the use of materials for modern cervical instrumentation, evaluating its viability in children and adolescents, and the techniques used in different cases. The efficacy of the techniques was analyzed through improvement of pain, maintenance of cervical range of motion, recovery of craniocervical stability, bone consolidation, and spinal stenosis in the postoperative follow-up. Method: Retrospective study of the clinical and radiological parameters of 27 patients aged two to 16 years with cervical spine diseases. Results: Two patients had chronic dislocation in C1-C2, one had congenital axis spondylolisthesis, two had congenital dislocation in C1-C2, three had tumors, one had kyphosis after laminectomy, one had post-infection kyphosis, one had fracture, 11 were syndromic with instabilities, and five had congenital cervical scoliosis. As to surgical approaches, two patients were transorally operated, three by anterior approach, 15 by posterior approach, two by anterior and posterior approaches, and five were treated in three stages (anterior, posterior and anterior approaches). Regarding the technique of cervical stabilization, seven patients were treated by Goel-Harms technique, two received Goel’s facet distraction, and three, Wright translaminar screws. There were complications in four cases. Two patients in the instrumentation of C1 lateral mass due to poor positioning, one with cerebrospinal fluid fistula and one with surgical wound infection. Conclusion: Modern cervical instrumentation in pediatric patients is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of cervical instability. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000400274 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000400274 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1808-185120171604179210 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna v.16 n.4 2017 reponame:Coluna/Columna instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) instacron:SBCO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
instacron_str |
SBCO |
institution |
SBCO |
reponame_str |
Coluna/Columna |
collection |
Coluna/Columna |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126615577427968 |