KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zarza,William
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Astur,Nelson, Kim,Leandro, Miotto,Lucas, Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes Medéa de, Gotfryd,Alberto O., Caffaro,Maria Fernanda S., Meves,Robert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000100400
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Vertebral fracture is the main complication of osteoporosis and is common among the elderly. Conservative treatment is the first choice for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) but for persistent painful cases, percutaneous vertebral cement augmentation techniques, such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, are indicated. We performed a systematic review to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of both methods. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The PICO search strategy consisted of the following terms: Population- Patients with OVCFs; Intervention- Kyphoplasty; Control- Vertebroplasty; Outcomes- Pain, Cement Leakage, Vertebral Body Height, Adjacent level fractures, Oswestry (ODI) and SF36. Results: Seven articles were included in the qualitative analysis, selecting only randomized controlled trials. Four hundred and fifty patients were treated with vertebroplasty (VP) and 469 with kyphoplasty (KP). The leakage rate of the VP group was 63% versus 14% for the KP group. However, these results were without statistical significance. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ODI and SF-36 outcomes were evaluated based on the 6-month and 1-year follow-up results, and we were unable to find any significant differences between treatments. For restoration of vertebral height, the values of the KP group were, on average, 0.71 cm higher than those of the VP group, with 95% CI. Conclusion: Based on this systematic review, kyphoplasty is superior to vertebroplasty for achieving gains in vertebral body height. As regards cement leakage and other clinical outcomes, neither method showed statistically significant superiority. Level of Evidence I; Systematic review.
id SBCO-1_5ea75ad3f1bd4a5801cd0017e1d5659e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512022000100400
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSISKyphoplastyVertebroplastyMeta-AnalysisSpinal FracturesABSTRACT Introduction: Vertebral fracture is the main complication of osteoporosis and is common among the elderly. Conservative treatment is the first choice for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) but for persistent painful cases, percutaneous vertebral cement augmentation techniques, such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, are indicated. We performed a systematic review to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of both methods. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The PICO search strategy consisted of the following terms: Population- Patients with OVCFs; Intervention- Kyphoplasty; Control- Vertebroplasty; Outcomes- Pain, Cement Leakage, Vertebral Body Height, Adjacent level fractures, Oswestry (ODI) and SF36. Results: Seven articles were included in the qualitative analysis, selecting only randomized controlled trials. Four hundred and fifty patients were treated with vertebroplasty (VP) and 469 with kyphoplasty (KP). The leakage rate of the VP group was 63% versus 14% for the KP group. However, these results were without statistical significance. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ODI and SF-36 outcomes were evaluated based on the 6-month and 1-year follow-up results, and we were unable to find any significant differences between treatments. For restoration of vertebral height, the values of the KP group were, on average, 0.71 cm higher than those of the VP group, with 95% CI. Conclusion: Based on this systematic review, kyphoplasty is superior to vertebroplasty for achieving gains in vertebral body height. As regards cement leakage and other clinical outcomes, neither method showed statistically significant superiority. Level of Evidence I; Systematic review.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000100400Coluna/Columna v.21 n.1 2022reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120222101250913info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZarza,WilliamAstur,NelsonKim,LeandroMiotto,LucasMendonça,Rodrigo Góes Medéa deGotfryd,Alberto O.Caffaro,Maria Fernanda S.Meves,Roberteng2022-03-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512022000100400Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2022-03-30T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
title KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
spellingShingle KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
Zarza,William
Kyphoplasty
Vertebroplasty
Meta-Analysis
Spinal Fractures
title_short KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
title_full KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
title_fullStr KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
title_sort KYPHOPLASTY VERSUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A META-ANALYSIS
author Zarza,William
author_facet Zarza,William
Astur,Nelson
Kim,Leandro
Miotto,Lucas
Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes Medéa de
Gotfryd,Alberto O.
Caffaro,Maria Fernanda S.
Meves,Robert
author_role author
author2 Astur,Nelson
Kim,Leandro
Miotto,Lucas
Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes Medéa de
Gotfryd,Alberto O.
Caffaro,Maria Fernanda S.
Meves,Robert
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zarza,William
Astur,Nelson
Kim,Leandro
Miotto,Lucas
Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes Medéa de
Gotfryd,Alberto O.
Caffaro,Maria Fernanda S.
Meves,Robert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kyphoplasty
Vertebroplasty
Meta-Analysis
Spinal Fractures
topic Kyphoplasty
Vertebroplasty
Meta-Analysis
Spinal Fractures
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Vertebral fracture is the main complication of osteoporosis and is common among the elderly. Conservative treatment is the first choice for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) but for persistent painful cases, percutaneous vertebral cement augmentation techniques, such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, are indicated. We performed a systematic review to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of both methods. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The PICO search strategy consisted of the following terms: Population- Patients with OVCFs; Intervention- Kyphoplasty; Control- Vertebroplasty; Outcomes- Pain, Cement Leakage, Vertebral Body Height, Adjacent level fractures, Oswestry (ODI) and SF36. Results: Seven articles were included in the qualitative analysis, selecting only randomized controlled trials. Four hundred and fifty patients were treated with vertebroplasty (VP) and 469 with kyphoplasty (KP). The leakage rate of the VP group was 63% versus 14% for the KP group. However, these results were without statistical significance. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ODI and SF-36 outcomes were evaluated based on the 6-month and 1-year follow-up results, and we were unable to find any significant differences between treatments. For restoration of vertebral height, the values of the KP group were, on average, 0.71 cm higher than those of the VP group, with 95% CI. Conclusion: Based on this systematic review, kyphoplasty is superior to vertebroplasty for achieving gains in vertebral body height. As regards cement leakage and other clinical outcomes, neither method showed statistically significant superiority. Level of Evidence I; Systematic review.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000100400
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000100400
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120222101250913
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.21 n.1 2022
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126616751833088