RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MILAZZO NETTO,LUIZ CARLOS
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: PRATALI,RAPHAEL DE REZENDE, NASCIMENTO,VINÍCIO NUNES, FELISBINO JR,PEDRO, MELO,NILO CARRIJO, ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO, DAHER,SÉRGIO, DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512020000200092
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective To compare radiographic findings of patients who underwent laminoplasty and laminectomy with arthrodesis for spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Methods Who were submitted to laminectomy with arthrodesis or laminoplasty to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy with minimum follow-up of 6 months. The radiographic parameters related to the cervical spine evaluated were C0C2 lordosis (C0C2), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), neck tilt (NT), cervical sagittal vertical axis (CSVA), and T1S – CL mismatch (T1S-CL). Results We evaluated 34 patients, 23 (68%) of whom were men. The mean age was 65 years (SD ± 13). There was no statistical difference in any of the preoperative radiographic parameters. Considering the patients submitted to laminectomy alone, a significant difference was observed for C0C2 (P = 0.045), CSVA (P = 0.0008), with differences between IPO and POS times (P = 0.026) and between PRE and POS (P = 0.0013) and T1S – CL mismatch (P = 0.0004), with a difference between IPO and POS (P = 0.0076) and between PRE and POS (P=0.001). Considering the patients submitted to laminoplasty alone, there was no difference over time for any radiographic parameters considered. Comparing the radiographic parameters between the laminectomy and laminoplasty groups in the three time periods, there was no significant difference for any of them. Conclusion This study suggests that patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent laminectomy with instrumentation may present worse radiographic evolution as regards cervical sagittal alignment over time when compared to patients who underwent laminoplasty. Level of evidence III; Retrospective case series.
id SBCO-1_6e3285a3aac7f49e889bb50ea1b6d8ec
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512020000200092
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHYSpineSpinal Cord CompressionTreatment OutcomeSpondylosisABSTRACT Objective To compare radiographic findings of patients who underwent laminoplasty and laminectomy with arthrodesis for spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Methods Who were submitted to laminectomy with arthrodesis or laminoplasty to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy with minimum follow-up of 6 months. The radiographic parameters related to the cervical spine evaluated were C0C2 lordosis (C0C2), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), neck tilt (NT), cervical sagittal vertical axis (CSVA), and T1S – CL mismatch (T1S-CL). Results We evaluated 34 patients, 23 (68%) of whom were men. The mean age was 65 years (SD ± 13). There was no statistical difference in any of the preoperative radiographic parameters. Considering the patients submitted to laminectomy alone, a significant difference was observed for C0C2 (P = 0.045), CSVA (P = 0.0008), with differences between IPO and POS times (P = 0.026) and between PRE and POS (P = 0.0013) and T1S – CL mismatch (P = 0.0004), with a difference between IPO and POS (P = 0.0076) and between PRE and POS (P=0.001). Considering the patients submitted to laminoplasty alone, there was no difference over time for any radiographic parameters considered. Comparing the radiographic parameters between the laminectomy and laminoplasty groups in the three time periods, there was no significant difference for any of them. Conclusion This study suggests that patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent laminectomy with instrumentation may present worse radiographic evolution as regards cervical sagittal alignment over time when compared to patients who underwent laminoplasty. Level of evidence III; Retrospective case series.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512020000200092Coluna/Columna v.19 n.2 2020reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120201902197199info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMILAZZO NETTO,LUIZ CARLOSPRATALI,RAPHAEL DE REZENDENASCIMENTO,VINÍCIO NUNESFELISBINO JR,PEDROMELO,NILO CARRIJOARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRODAHER,SÉRGIODAHER,MURILO TAVARESeng2020-05-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512020000200092Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2020-05-11T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
title RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
spellingShingle RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
MILAZZO NETTO,LUIZ CARLOS
Spine
Spinal Cord Compression
Treatment Outcome
Spondylosis
title_short RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
title_full RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
title_fullStr RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
title_full_unstemmed RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
title_sort RADIOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION AND CERVICAL SAGITAL BALANCE OF LAMINOPLASTY VERSUS LAMINECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY
author MILAZZO NETTO,LUIZ CARLOS
author_facet MILAZZO NETTO,LUIZ CARLOS
PRATALI,RAPHAEL DE REZENDE
NASCIMENTO,VINÍCIO NUNES
FELISBINO JR,PEDRO
MELO,NILO CARRIJO
ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO
DAHER,SÉRGIO
DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
author_role author
author2 PRATALI,RAPHAEL DE REZENDE
NASCIMENTO,VINÍCIO NUNES
FELISBINO JR,PEDRO
MELO,NILO CARRIJO
ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO
DAHER,SÉRGIO
DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MILAZZO NETTO,LUIZ CARLOS
PRATALI,RAPHAEL DE REZENDE
NASCIMENTO,VINÍCIO NUNES
FELISBINO JR,PEDRO
MELO,NILO CARRIJO
ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO
DAHER,SÉRGIO
DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spine
Spinal Cord Compression
Treatment Outcome
Spondylosis
topic Spine
Spinal Cord Compression
Treatment Outcome
Spondylosis
description ABSTRACT Objective To compare radiographic findings of patients who underwent laminoplasty and laminectomy with arthrodesis for spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Methods Who were submitted to laminectomy with arthrodesis or laminoplasty to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy with minimum follow-up of 6 months. The radiographic parameters related to the cervical spine evaluated were C0C2 lordosis (C0C2), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), neck tilt (NT), cervical sagittal vertical axis (CSVA), and T1S – CL mismatch (T1S-CL). Results We evaluated 34 patients, 23 (68%) of whom were men. The mean age was 65 years (SD ± 13). There was no statistical difference in any of the preoperative radiographic parameters. Considering the patients submitted to laminectomy alone, a significant difference was observed for C0C2 (P = 0.045), CSVA (P = 0.0008), with differences between IPO and POS times (P = 0.026) and between PRE and POS (P = 0.0013) and T1S – CL mismatch (P = 0.0004), with a difference between IPO and POS (P = 0.0076) and between PRE and POS (P=0.001). Considering the patients submitted to laminoplasty alone, there was no difference over time for any radiographic parameters considered. Comparing the radiographic parameters between the laminectomy and laminoplasty groups in the three time periods, there was no significant difference for any of them. Conclusion This study suggests that patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent laminectomy with instrumentation may present worse radiographic evolution as regards cervical sagittal alignment over time when compared to patients who underwent laminoplasty. Level of evidence III; Retrospective case series.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512020000200092
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512020000200092
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120201902197199
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.19 n.2 2020
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126616358617088