ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Coluna/Columna |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100014 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the healing of the modified inverted “Y” incision in patients with scoliosis due to myelomeningocele. Methods: Retrospective study through medical records review of patients with myelomeningocele surgically treated with a modified inverted “Y” approach between January 2013 and December 2015. Results: We analyzed the medical records of six patients. Two patients progressed with skin complications in the immediate postoperative period and only one of them required surgical intervention for debridement and suturing. In another patient, it was necessary to perform two surgical reviews due to material failure without skin complications in these interventions. Conclusions: The modified inverted “Y” technique is a great alternative to traditional incision and inverted “Y” because it has good results in patients with spina bifida associated with poor skin conditions treated surgically for correction of spinal deformities. Level of Evidence IV; Case series. |
id |
SBCO-1_823bbb846b82125aacb083c7285fe283 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-18512019000100014 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCO-1 |
network_name_str |
Coluna/Columna |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELEMyelomeningoceleScoliosis/etiologyScoliosis/surgeryABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the healing of the modified inverted “Y” incision in patients with scoliosis due to myelomeningocele. Methods: Retrospective study through medical records review of patients with myelomeningocele surgically treated with a modified inverted “Y” approach between January 2013 and December 2015. Results: We analyzed the medical records of six patients. Two patients progressed with skin complications in the immediate postoperative period and only one of them required surgical intervention for debridement and suturing. In another patient, it was necessary to perform two surgical reviews due to material failure without skin complications in these interventions. Conclusions: The modified inverted “Y” technique is a great alternative to traditional incision and inverted “Y” because it has good results in patients with spina bifida associated with poor skin conditions treated surgically for correction of spinal deformities. Level of Evidence IV; Case series.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100014Coluna/Columna v.18 n.1 2019reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120191801178888info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra,Diego VeigaRocha,Luis Eduardo Munhoz daGrimm,Dulce HelenaAguiar,Carlos Abreu deÁvila,Luiz MüllerSoccol,Fernandoeng2019-02-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512019000100014Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2019-02-19T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE |
title |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE |
spellingShingle |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE Bezerra,Diego Veiga Myelomeningocele Scoliosis/etiology Scoliosis/surgery |
title_short |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE |
title_full |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE |
title_fullStr |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE |
title_full_unstemmed |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE |
title_sort |
ALTERNATIVE TO THE INVERTED “Y” INCISION IN SCOLIOSIS SECONDARY TO MYELOMENINGOCELE |
author |
Bezerra,Diego Veiga |
author_facet |
Bezerra,Diego Veiga Rocha,Luis Eduardo Munhoz da Grimm,Dulce Helena Aguiar,Carlos Abreu de Ávila,Luiz Müller Soccol,Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha,Luis Eduardo Munhoz da Grimm,Dulce Helena Aguiar,Carlos Abreu de Ávila,Luiz Müller Soccol,Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bezerra,Diego Veiga Rocha,Luis Eduardo Munhoz da Grimm,Dulce Helena Aguiar,Carlos Abreu de Ávila,Luiz Müller Soccol,Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Myelomeningocele Scoliosis/etiology Scoliosis/surgery |
topic |
Myelomeningocele Scoliosis/etiology Scoliosis/surgery |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the healing of the modified inverted “Y” incision in patients with scoliosis due to myelomeningocele. Methods: Retrospective study through medical records review of patients with myelomeningocele surgically treated with a modified inverted “Y” approach between January 2013 and December 2015. Results: We analyzed the medical records of six patients. Two patients progressed with skin complications in the immediate postoperative period and only one of them required surgical intervention for debridement and suturing. In another patient, it was necessary to perform two surgical reviews due to material failure without skin complications in these interventions. Conclusions: The modified inverted “Y” technique is a great alternative to traditional incision and inverted “Y” because it has good results in patients with spina bifida associated with poor skin conditions treated surgically for correction of spinal deformities. Level of Evidence IV; Case series. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100014 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1808-185120191801178888 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna v.18 n.1 2019 reponame:Coluna/Columna instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) instacron:SBCO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
instacron_str |
SBCO |
institution |
SBCO |
reponame_str |
Coluna/Columna |
collection |
Coluna/Columna |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126615964352512 |