THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assunção Filho,Carlos Alberto
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Simões,Filipe Cedro, Prado,Gabriel Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100078
Resumo: ABSTRACT The number of fixed segments in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures remains controversial. This study aims to compare the results of short and long fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures through a meta-analysis of studies published recently. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were used. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies (prospective and retrospective) were selected. Data were analyzed with the software Review Manager. There was no statistically significant difference in the Cobb angle of preoperative kyphosis. Long fixation showed lower average measurements postoperatively (MD = 1.41; CI = 0.73-2.08; p<0.0001) and in the last follow-up (MD = 3.98; CI = 3.22-4.75; p<0.00001). The short fixation showed the highest failure rates (RD = 4.03; CI = 1.33-12.16; p=0.01) and increased loss of height of the vertebral body (MD = 1.24; CI = 0.49-1.98; p=0.001), with shorter operative time (MD = -24.54; CI = -30.16 - -18.91; p<0.00001). There was no significant difference in blood loss and clinical outcomes. The high rates of kyphosis correction loss with short fixation and the lower correction rate in the immediate postoperative period were validated. There was no significant difference in the blood loss rates because arthrodesis was performed in a short segment in the analyzed studies. The short fixation was performed in a shorter operative time, as expected. No study has shown superior clinical outcomes. The short fixation had worse rates of kyphosis correction in the immediate postoperative period, and increased loss of correction in long-term follow-up, making the long fixation an effective option in the management of this type of fracture.
id SBCO-1_89f496fd7226ba7cae87bee4defd97e9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512016000100078
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSISThoracolumbar fracturesShort fixationLong fixationMeta-analysisPosterior fixationABSTRACT The number of fixed segments in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures remains controversial. This study aims to compare the results of short and long fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures through a meta-analysis of studies published recently. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were used. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies (prospective and retrospective) were selected. Data were analyzed with the software Review Manager. There was no statistically significant difference in the Cobb angle of preoperative kyphosis. Long fixation showed lower average measurements postoperatively (MD = 1.41; CI = 0.73-2.08; p<0.0001) and in the last follow-up (MD = 3.98; CI = 3.22-4.75; p<0.00001). The short fixation showed the highest failure rates (RD = 4.03; CI = 1.33-12.16; p=0.01) and increased loss of height of the vertebral body (MD = 1.24; CI = 0.49-1.98; p=0.001), with shorter operative time (MD = -24.54; CI = -30.16 - -18.91; p<0.00001). There was no significant difference in blood loss and clinical outcomes. The high rates of kyphosis correction loss with short fixation and the lower correction rate in the immediate postoperative period were validated. There was no significant difference in the blood loss rates because arthrodesis was performed in a short segment in the analyzed studies. The short fixation was performed in a shorter operative time, as expected. No study has shown superior clinical outcomes. The short fixation had worse rates of kyphosis correction in the immediate postoperative period, and increased loss of correction in long-term follow-up, making the long fixation an effective option in the management of this type of fracture.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100078Coluna/Columna v.15 n.1 2016reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/S1808-185120161501154925info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssunção Filho,Carlos AlbertoSimões,Filipe CedroPrado,Gabriel Oliveiraeng2016-09-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512016000100078Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2016-09-15T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
title THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
spellingShingle THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
Assunção Filho,Carlos Alberto
Thoracolumbar fractures
Short fixation
Long fixation
Meta-analysis
Posterior fixation
title_short THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
title_full THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
title_fullStr THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
title_sort THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES, SHORT X LONG FIXATION: A META-ANALYSIS
author Assunção Filho,Carlos Alberto
author_facet Assunção Filho,Carlos Alberto
Simões,Filipe Cedro
Prado,Gabriel Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Simões,Filipe Cedro
Prado,Gabriel Oliveira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assunção Filho,Carlos Alberto
Simões,Filipe Cedro
Prado,Gabriel Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Thoracolumbar fractures
Short fixation
Long fixation
Meta-analysis
Posterior fixation
topic Thoracolumbar fractures
Short fixation
Long fixation
Meta-analysis
Posterior fixation
description ABSTRACT The number of fixed segments in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures remains controversial. This study aims to compare the results of short and long fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures through a meta-analysis of studies published recently. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were used. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies (prospective and retrospective) were selected. Data were analyzed with the software Review Manager. There was no statistically significant difference in the Cobb angle of preoperative kyphosis. Long fixation showed lower average measurements postoperatively (MD = 1.41; CI = 0.73-2.08; p<0.0001) and in the last follow-up (MD = 3.98; CI = 3.22-4.75; p<0.00001). The short fixation showed the highest failure rates (RD = 4.03; CI = 1.33-12.16; p=0.01) and increased loss of height of the vertebral body (MD = 1.24; CI = 0.49-1.98; p=0.001), with shorter operative time (MD = -24.54; CI = -30.16 - -18.91; p<0.00001). There was no significant difference in blood loss and clinical outcomes. The high rates of kyphosis correction loss with short fixation and the lower correction rate in the immediate postoperative period were validated. There was no significant difference in the blood loss rates because arthrodesis was performed in a short segment in the analyzed studies. The short fixation was performed in a shorter operative time, as expected. No study has shown superior clinical outcomes. The short fixation had worse rates of kyphosis correction in the immediate postoperative period, and increased loss of correction in long-term follow-up, making the long fixation an effective option in the management of this type of fracture.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100078
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100078
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1808-185120161501154925
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.15 n.1 2016
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615161143296