HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bazán,Pedro Luis
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Jordan,Ricardo Cepeda, Cevallos,Juan Romel Medina, Adaro,Alfredo Osvaldo Godoy, Adaro,José Carlos Soria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000300304
Resumo: ABSTRACT Bone mineral density is a crucial factor in the success or failure of osteosynthesis in spine surgery; it shows the onset of osteoporosis and related complications. Its evaluation is verified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement by CT scan. Objective: Determine the use of HU in surgical planning; compare utility in diagnosing osteoporosis by DEXA; and evaluate sensitivity in predicting complications. Method: A systemic literature review was conducted on PubMed, in line with PRISMA methodology. Including those who justified the use of pre-surgical planning, compared HU/DEXA, and assessed complications. For the statistical analysis, the χ2 was used. Results: 57 articles were identified by selecting nine that met the inclusion criteria. In patients undergoing spinal surgery for fixation and fusion for degenerative pathology, HU measurement showed a prevalence of osteoporosis of 58.5% (sensitivity 93.26%; specificity 90.22%), osteoporosis-associated complications of 24.5%, proper diagnosis of 71.98%, and screw release rate of 82.31%. Conclusions: UH measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis turns out to be more sensitive, specific, and predictive compared to DEXA, especially in elderly patients; it represents a useful tool in planning spinal surgery, minimizing the risk of complications such as screw release, fractures, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence of intersomatic devices, and kyphosis of the proximal junction. Level of evidence II; Study Design: Systematic Review and meta-analysis.
id SBCO-1_c231370e42ad96b906c52aefad9205fd
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512022000300304
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSISAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityOsteoporosisBone ScrewsTomographyKyphosisABSTRACT Bone mineral density is a crucial factor in the success or failure of osteosynthesis in spine surgery; it shows the onset of osteoporosis and related complications. Its evaluation is verified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement by CT scan. Objective: Determine the use of HU in surgical planning; compare utility in diagnosing osteoporosis by DEXA; and evaluate sensitivity in predicting complications. Method: A systemic literature review was conducted on PubMed, in line with PRISMA methodology. Including those who justified the use of pre-surgical planning, compared HU/DEXA, and assessed complications. For the statistical analysis, the χ2 was used. Results: 57 articles were identified by selecting nine that met the inclusion criteria. In patients undergoing spinal surgery for fixation and fusion for degenerative pathology, HU measurement showed a prevalence of osteoporosis of 58.5% (sensitivity 93.26%; specificity 90.22%), osteoporosis-associated complications of 24.5%, proper diagnosis of 71.98%, and screw release rate of 82.31%. Conclusions: UH measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis turns out to be more sensitive, specific, and predictive compared to DEXA, especially in elderly patients; it represents a useful tool in planning spinal surgery, minimizing the risk of complications such as screw release, fractures, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence of intersomatic devices, and kyphosis of the proximal junction. Level of evidence II; Study Design: Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000300304Coluna/Columna v.21 n.3 2022reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120222103264579info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBazán,Pedro LuisJordan,Ricardo CepedaCevallos,Juan Romel MedinaAdaro,Alfredo Osvaldo GodoyAdaro,José Carlos Soriaeng2022-09-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512022000300304Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2022-09-30T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
spellingShingle HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Bazán,Pedro Luis
Absorptiometry, Photon
Bone Density
Osteoporosis
Bone Screws
Tomography
Kyphosis
title_short HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_full HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_fullStr HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_sort HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
author Bazán,Pedro Luis
author_facet Bazán,Pedro Luis
Jordan,Ricardo Cepeda
Cevallos,Juan Romel Medina
Adaro,Alfredo Osvaldo Godoy
Adaro,José Carlos Soria
author_role author
author2 Jordan,Ricardo Cepeda
Cevallos,Juan Romel Medina
Adaro,Alfredo Osvaldo Godoy
Adaro,José Carlos Soria
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bazán,Pedro Luis
Jordan,Ricardo Cepeda
Cevallos,Juan Romel Medina
Adaro,Alfredo Osvaldo Godoy
Adaro,José Carlos Soria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Absorptiometry, Photon
Bone Density
Osteoporosis
Bone Screws
Tomography
Kyphosis
topic Absorptiometry, Photon
Bone Density
Osteoporosis
Bone Screws
Tomography
Kyphosis
description ABSTRACT Bone mineral density is a crucial factor in the success or failure of osteosynthesis in spine surgery; it shows the onset of osteoporosis and related complications. Its evaluation is verified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement by CT scan. Objective: Determine the use of HU in surgical planning; compare utility in diagnosing osteoporosis by DEXA; and evaluate sensitivity in predicting complications. Method: A systemic literature review was conducted on PubMed, in line with PRISMA methodology. Including those who justified the use of pre-surgical planning, compared HU/DEXA, and assessed complications. For the statistical analysis, the χ2 was used. Results: 57 articles were identified by selecting nine that met the inclusion criteria. In patients undergoing spinal surgery for fixation and fusion for degenerative pathology, HU measurement showed a prevalence of osteoporosis of 58.5% (sensitivity 93.26%; specificity 90.22%), osteoporosis-associated complications of 24.5%, proper diagnosis of 71.98%, and screw release rate of 82.31%. Conclusions: UH measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis turns out to be more sensitive, specific, and predictive compared to DEXA, especially in elderly patients; it represents a useful tool in planning spinal surgery, minimizing the risk of complications such as screw release, fractures, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence of intersomatic devices, and kyphosis of the proximal junction. Level of evidence II; Study Design: Systematic Review and meta-analysis.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000300304
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000300304
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120222103264579
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.21 n.3 2022
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126616806359040