ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gushcha,Artem
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Vershinin,Andrey, Arestov,Sergey, Kashcheev,Alexey, Tjurnikov,Vladimir, Dreval,Maksim, Poltoraco,Ekateryna, Petrosyan,David
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000300200
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: Degenerative diseases of the spine are the most common disorder seen in the practice of the neurosurgeon. According to many surgeons, microdiscectomy is the “gold standard” of surgical treatment. Analyzing the current literature, it is seen that the use of endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery is increasing. However, due to the lack of detailed information on the advantages and disadvantages of these methods, there is a need for continuing research in this area. Work to clarify the features of these methods, their specificity and algorithmization will increase the effectiveness of surgical treatment. Methods: This study included patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs, the presence of pain in the leg, and failed of conservative therapy. In the period 2014 to 2017, 172 endoscopic lumbar discectomies were performed, using microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. The effectiveness of each technique was evaluated through comparative analysis. Results: In both groups, the methods used obtained high efficacy rates. Comparative analysis showed the advantages of the percutaneous technique in terms of shortening the return to normal activity time, hospitalization time, and disability, and reducing back pain in the early postoperative period. On the other hand, the microendoscopic discectomy enabled greater radicality to be achieved in cases with herniated disc ossification and complex anatomy of the vertebral segment. Conclusions: Analysis of the data obtained led to the formulation of an algorithm for selecting the optimum endoscopic method for achieving positive results of surgical treatment. Level of Evidence II; Therapeutic studies, investigating the results of treatment.
id SBCO-1_dd805c0b85a43d7088bfd234f5d51f92
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512018000300200
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTIONIntervertebral disc displacementDiskectomyNeuroendoscopyABSTRACT Objective: Degenerative diseases of the spine are the most common disorder seen in the practice of the neurosurgeon. According to many surgeons, microdiscectomy is the “gold standard” of surgical treatment. Analyzing the current literature, it is seen that the use of endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery is increasing. However, due to the lack of detailed information on the advantages and disadvantages of these methods, there is a need for continuing research in this area. Work to clarify the features of these methods, their specificity and algorithmization will increase the effectiveness of surgical treatment. Methods: This study included patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs, the presence of pain in the leg, and failed of conservative therapy. In the period 2014 to 2017, 172 endoscopic lumbar discectomies were performed, using microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. The effectiveness of each technique was evaluated through comparative analysis. Results: In both groups, the methods used obtained high efficacy rates. Comparative analysis showed the advantages of the percutaneous technique in terms of shortening the return to normal activity time, hospitalization time, and disability, and reducing back pain in the early postoperative period. On the other hand, the microendoscopic discectomy enabled greater radicality to be achieved in cases with herniated disc ossification and complex anatomy of the vertebral segment. Conclusions: Analysis of the data obtained led to the formulation of an algorithm for selecting the optimum endoscopic method for achieving positive results of surgical treatment. Level of Evidence II; Therapeutic studies, investigating the results of treatment.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000300200Coluna/Columna v.17 n.3 2018reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120181703191839info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGushcha,ArtemVershinin,AndreyArestov,SergeyKashcheev,AlexeyTjurnikov,VladimirDreval,MaksimPoltoraco,EkaterynaPetrosyan,Davideng2018-09-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512018000300200Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2018-09-13T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
title ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
spellingShingle ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
Gushcha,Artem
Intervertebral disc displacement
Diskectomy
Neuroendoscopy
title_short ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
title_full ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
title_fullStr ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
title_full_unstemmed ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
title_sort ADVANTAGES AND WEAKNESSES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: ALGORITHM SELECTION
author Gushcha,Artem
author_facet Gushcha,Artem
Vershinin,Andrey
Arestov,Sergey
Kashcheev,Alexey
Tjurnikov,Vladimir
Dreval,Maksim
Poltoraco,Ekateryna
Petrosyan,David
author_role author
author2 Vershinin,Andrey
Arestov,Sergey
Kashcheev,Alexey
Tjurnikov,Vladimir
Dreval,Maksim
Poltoraco,Ekateryna
Petrosyan,David
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gushcha,Artem
Vershinin,Andrey
Arestov,Sergey
Kashcheev,Alexey
Tjurnikov,Vladimir
Dreval,Maksim
Poltoraco,Ekateryna
Petrosyan,David
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intervertebral disc displacement
Diskectomy
Neuroendoscopy
topic Intervertebral disc displacement
Diskectomy
Neuroendoscopy
description ABSTRACT Objective: Degenerative diseases of the spine are the most common disorder seen in the practice of the neurosurgeon. According to many surgeons, microdiscectomy is the “gold standard” of surgical treatment. Analyzing the current literature, it is seen that the use of endoscopic techniques in spinal surgery is increasing. However, due to the lack of detailed information on the advantages and disadvantages of these methods, there is a need for continuing research in this area. Work to clarify the features of these methods, their specificity and algorithmization will increase the effectiveness of surgical treatment. Methods: This study included patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs, the presence of pain in the leg, and failed of conservative therapy. In the period 2014 to 2017, 172 endoscopic lumbar discectomies were performed, using microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. The effectiveness of each technique was evaluated through comparative analysis. Results: In both groups, the methods used obtained high efficacy rates. Comparative analysis showed the advantages of the percutaneous technique in terms of shortening the return to normal activity time, hospitalization time, and disability, and reducing back pain in the early postoperative period. On the other hand, the microendoscopic discectomy enabled greater radicality to be achieved in cases with herniated disc ossification and complex anatomy of the vertebral segment. Conclusions: Analysis of the data obtained led to the formulation of an algorithm for selecting the optimum endoscopic method for achieving positive results of surgical treatment. Level of Evidence II; Therapeutic studies, investigating the results of treatment.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000300200
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000300200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120181703191839
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.17 n.3 2018
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615917166592