COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Coluna/Columna |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility and the interobserver coefficient of concordance between the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Methods: Retrospective study of radiographic data analysis. Data were collected from 31 radiographic studies of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture and distributed to a team involving spinal surgeons and residents. The fractures were classified according to the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cohen Kappa test to assess the coefficient of concordance. Results: The Kappa value for interobserver concordance of AO/Magerl classification was κ = 0.70 and standard deviation was 0.16. For the AOSpine classification, we observed κ = 0.76, both with significance level α = 0.05 and P<0.001. Conclusions: We conclude that the interobserver concordance of the new AOSpine classification is similar to the AO/Magerl classification. This conclusion reinforces the reproducibility of the new AOSpine classification. Level of evidence: IV,Type of Study: Case series. |
id |
SBCO-1_e57ae7e38353dff03b8a7cd7e2335226 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-18512018000100035 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCO-1 |
network_name_str |
Coluna/Columna |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURESSpineSpinal fracturesSpinal injuriesABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility and the interobserver coefficient of concordance between the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Methods: Retrospective study of radiographic data analysis. Data were collected from 31 radiographic studies of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture and distributed to a team involving spinal surgeons and residents. The fractures were classified according to the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cohen Kappa test to assess the coefficient of concordance. Results: The Kappa value for interobserver concordance of AO/Magerl classification was κ = 0.70 and standard deviation was 0.16. For the AOSpine classification, we observed κ = 0.76, both with significance level α = 0.05 and P<0.001. Conclusions: We conclude that the interobserver concordance of the new AOSpine classification is similar to the AO/Magerl classification. This conclusion reinforces the reproducibility of the new AOSpine classification. Level of evidence: IV,Type of Study: Case series.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035Coluna/Columna v.17 n.1 2018reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120181701179188info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTOSANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOSHENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITOeng2018-04-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512018000100035Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2018-04-20T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES |
title |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES |
spellingShingle |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO Spine Spinal fractures Spinal injuries |
title_short |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES |
title_full |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES |
title_fullStr |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES |
title_sort |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES |
author |
VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO |
author_facet |
VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO SANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOS HENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOS HENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITO |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO SANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOS HENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spine Spinal fractures Spinal injuries |
topic |
Spine Spinal fractures Spinal injuries |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility and the interobserver coefficient of concordance between the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Methods: Retrospective study of radiographic data analysis. Data were collected from 31 radiographic studies of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture and distributed to a team involving spinal surgeons and residents. The fractures were classified according to the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cohen Kappa test to assess the coefficient of concordance. Results: The Kappa value for interobserver concordance of AO/Magerl classification was κ = 0.70 and standard deviation was 0.16. For the AOSpine classification, we observed κ = 0.76, both with significance level α = 0.05 and P<0.001. Conclusions: We conclude that the interobserver concordance of the new AOSpine classification is similar to the AO/Magerl classification. This conclusion reinforces the reproducibility of the new AOSpine classification. Level of evidence: IV,Type of Study: Case series. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1808-185120181701179188 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna v.17 n.1 2018 reponame:Coluna/Columna instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) instacron:SBCO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
instacron_str |
SBCO |
institution |
SBCO |
reponame_str |
Coluna/Columna |
collection |
Coluna/Columna |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126615608885248 |