PRE- AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SPINOPELVIC AND GLOBAL SAGITTAL PARAMETERS OF PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

• Autor(a) principal: Souza,Anderson Fellipe Matos de
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Avila,Luiz Müller, Aguiar,Carlos Abreu de, Rocha,Luís Eduardo Munhoz da
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000100206
• topic: Scoliosis; Arthrodesis; Kyphosis

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the pre- and postoperative spinopelvic parameters and global sagittal balance of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) divided into 3 groups (Group 1 – thoracic arthrodesis, Group 2 - thoracolumbar arthrodesis, and Group 3 – lumbar arthrodesis), observing differences in these two moments and whether the parameter values are maintained or not over a period of up to 2 years following surgery. Methods: We analyzed the radiographs from a single-center database of 99 patients who underwent arthrodesis with posterior instrumentation. Pelvic incidence, pelvic version, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and sagittal vertical axis values were measured in the pre- and postoperative radiographies of each patient. Results: The parameters of pelvic incidence, pelvic version, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis did not show statistically significant differences among the 3 groups. There was a difference in preoperative lumbar lordosis between the 3 groups (p = 0.049). Thoracic kyphosis showed differences both in the pre- (p = 0.015) and postoperative (p = 0.042) values, in addition to demonstrating a relationship of dependence between the pre- and postoperative values in the final statistical analysis. Conclusion: The evaluation of the parameters analyzed shows that the study groups have similar values of individual balance, with the exception of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, which are measurements that depend on the surgical technique and compensatory mechanisms, but remained within normal ranges. These factors allow the surgeon to be attentive to both the coronal and sagittal planes when planning the correction in order to achieve the equilibrium of the trunk in addition to correction of the deformity. Level of Evidence IIIA: Comparative retrospective study.