CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gradin,Ana Paula Teixeira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rossoni,Karla Marcovich, Bonato,Laísa, Zanon,Igor de Barcellos, Batista Junior,José Lucas, Jacob Junior,Charbel, Cardoso,Igor Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000400287
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the peri- and postoperative results and clinical repercussions in patients undergoing decompression surgery and single-level lumbar arthrodesis using the traditional technique (OTLIF) and to compare with the results of minimally invasive techniques (MITLIF) described in the literature. Methods: Our sample consisted of 22 patients who underwent TLIF surgery using the open technique (OTLIF) in the period October 2019 to January 2021, in our hospital. We compared the patients’ functional clinical results using the Oswestry scale in the preoperative period and 15 days after surgery, analyzed variables related to the perioperative period: surgery time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, use of a suction drain, and admission to the ICU, and compared these with the results reported in the literature for patients treated by the MITLIF technique. Results: The average age was 48.95 years and the most operated level was L4-L5 (55%). The average surgery time was 112.63 min. We did not use a suction drain in the postoperative period, there was no need for a blood transfusion in any patient, and no patient was admitted to the ICU. The average hospital stay was 1 day. Regarding the Oswestry Disability Index, the mean preoperative score was 44.73 and after 15 days, it was 24.05. Conclusions: surgical treatment using the OTLIF technique for single-level lumbar degenerative disease showed largely positive results, with improvement in disability scores, short hospital stay and low incidence of complications. When properly indicated, OTLIF is an excellent and safe option for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Level of evidence IV; Case series study.
id SBCO-1_f6052d17de2d3ab6be4bd5bc89eab7d5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512021000400287
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESISLow Back PainLumbosacral RegionOutcome Assessment, Health CareABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the peri- and postoperative results and clinical repercussions in patients undergoing decompression surgery and single-level lumbar arthrodesis using the traditional technique (OTLIF) and to compare with the results of minimally invasive techniques (MITLIF) described in the literature. Methods: Our sample consisted of 22 patients who underwent TLIF surgery using the open technique (OTLIF) in the period October 2019 to January 2021, in our hospital. We compared the patients’ functional clinical results using the Oswestry scale in the preoperative period and 15 days after surgery, analyzed variables related to the perioperative period: surgery time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, use of a suction drain, and admission to the ICU, and compared these with the results reported in the literature for patients treated by the MITLIF technique. Results: The average age was 48.95 years and the most operated level was L4-L5 (55%). The average surgery time was 112.63 min. We did not use a suction drain in the postoperative period, there was no need for a blood transfusion in any patient, and no patient was admitted to the ICU. The average hospital stay was 1 day. Regarding the Oswestry Disability Index, the mean preoperative score was 44.73 and after 15 days, it was 24.05. Conclusions: surgical treatment using the OTLIF technique for single-level lumbar degenerative disease showed largely positive results, with improvement in disability scores, short hospital stay and low incidence of complications. When properly indicated, OTLIF is an excellent and safe option for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Level of evidence IV; Case series study.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000400287Coluna/Columna v.20 n.4 2021reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120212004250509info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGradin,Ana Paula TeixeiraRossoni,Karla MarcovichBonato,LaísaZanon,Igor de BarcellosBatista Junior,José LucasJacob Junior,CharbelCardoso,Igor Machadoeng2022-01-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512021000400287Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2022-01-03T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
title CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
spellingShingle CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
Gradin,Ana Paula Teixeira
Low Back Pain
Lumbosacral Region
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
title_short CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
title_full CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
title_fullStr CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
title_full_unstemmed CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
title_sort CURRENT RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS
author Gradin,Ana Paula Teixeira
author_facet Gradin,Ana Paula Teixeira
Rossoni,Karla Marcovich
Bonato,Laísa
Zanon,Igor de Barcellos
Batista Junior,José Lucas
Jacob Junior,Charbel
Cardoso,Igor Machado
author_role author
author2 Rossoni,Karla Marcovich
Bonato,Laísa
Zanon,Igor de Barcellos
Batista Junior,José Lucas
Jacob Junior,Charbel
Cardoso,Igor Machado
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gradin,Ana Paula Teixeira
Rossoni,Karla Marcovich
Bonato,Laísa
Zanon,Igor de Barcellos
Batista Junior,José Lucas
Jacob Junior,Charbel
Cardoso,Igor Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Low Back Pain
Lumbosacral Region
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
topic Low Back Pain
Lumbosacral Region
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the peri- and postoperative results and clinical repercussions in patients undergoing decompression surgery and single-level lumbar arthrodesis using the traditional technique (OTLIF) and to compare with the results of minimally invasive techniques (MITLIF) described in the literature. Methods: Our sample consisted of 22 patients who underwent TLIF surgery using the open technique (OTLIF) in the period October 2019 to January 2021, in our hospital. We compared the patients’ functional clinical results using the Oswestry scale in the preoperative period and 15 days after surgery, analyzed variables related to the perioperative period: surgery time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, use of a suction drain, and admission to the ICU, and compared these with the results reported in the literature for patients treated by the MITLIF technique. Results: The average age was 48.95 years and the most operated level was L4-L5 (55%). The average surgery time was 112.63 min. We did not use a suction drain in the postoperative period, there was no need for a blood transfusion in any patient, and no patient was admitted to the ICU. The average hospital stay was 1 day. Regarding the Oswestry Disability Index, the mean preoperative score was 44.73 and after 15 days, it was 24.05. Conclusions: surgical treatment using the OTLIF technique for single-level lumbar degenerative disease showed largely positive results, with improvement in disability scores, short hospital stay and low incidence of complications. When properly indicated, OTLIF is an excellent and safe option for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Level of evidence IV; Case series study.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000400287
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512021000400287
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120212004250509
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.20 n.4 2021
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126616714084352