Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Ana Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Sampaio,Mónica, Marcos-Pinto,Ricardo, Lago,Paula, Rocha,Anabela, Matos,Eduarda, Santos,Marisa D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000100030
Resumo: ABSTRACT Background: Functional results after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis are variable. We assessed functional results in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and evaluated potential factors associated with poor functional results. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 38 patients who were submitted to a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, in the context of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, in at tertiary referral center, in the period between 1993 and 2013. Clinical records were analyzed and telephone interviews with protocoled questionnaire to 32 patients (12 ulcerative colitis, 20 familial adenomatous polyposis) were performed. Pouch functional results were also evaluated based in the Oresland score. The functional results were analyzed at four points of the patient outcome. Results: In 25 patients were performed restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and in 7 patients total colectomy preceded protectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Protective ileostomy was performed in all patients. There was no mortality and post-operative complications related with the pouch was 12.5% but treated conservatively. The mean follow-up was 13.2 years. Pouch failure occurs in 9.4% (2 in familial adenomatous polyposis and 1 in ulcerative colitis). Familial adenomatous polyposis patients achieved the best outcome but the outcome was acceptable in both groups. The median Oresland score was good with small variations over the years, although the best score being reached at 5 years after the surgery. Conclusions: The long-term results in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis were good in both groups, although better in familial adenomatous polyposis. In both, the best score of functional results seems to be reached at 5 years after surgery.
id SBCP-1_167a75ddf140cab3539f5a186ab8ee2e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632018000100030
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary centerIleal pouch anal anastomosisFunctional resultsFamilial adenomatous polyposisUlcerative colitisCrohn's diseaseABSTRACT Background: Functional results after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis are variable. We assessed functional results in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and evaluated potential factors associated with poor functional results. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 38 patients who were submitted to a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, in the context of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, in at tertiary referral center, in the period between 1993 and 2013. Clinical records were analyzed and telephone interviews with protocoled questionnaire to 32 patients (12 ulcerative colitis, 20 familial adenomatous polyposis) were performed. Pouch functional results were also evaluated based in the Oresland score. The functional results were analyzed at four points of the patient outcome. Results: In 25 patients were performed restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and in 7 patients total colectomy preceded protectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Protective ileostomy was performed in all patients. There was no mortality and post-operative complications related with the pouch was 12.5% but treated conservatively. The mean follow-up was 13.2 years. Pouch failure occurs in 9.4% (2 in familial adenomatous polyposis and 1 in ulcerative colitis). Familial adenomatous polyposis patients achieved the best outcome but the outcome was acceptable in both groups. The median Oresland score was good with small variations over the years, although the best score being reached at 5 years after the surgery. Conclusions: The long-term results in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis were good in both groups, although better in familial adenomatous polyposis. In both, the best score of functional results seems to be reached at 5 years after surgery.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000100030Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.38 n.1 2018reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1016/j.jcol.2017.09.416info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Ana CristinaSampaio,MónicaMarcos-Pinto,RicardoLago,PaulaRocha,AnabelaMatos,EduardaSantos,Marisa D.eng2018-03-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632018000100030Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2018-03-06T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
title Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
spellingShingle Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
Silva,Ana Cristina
Ileal pouch anal anastomosis
Functional results
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Ulcerative colitis
Crohn's disease
title_short Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
title_full Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
title_fullStr Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
title_full_unstemmed Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
title_sort Functional outcomes in patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in a single tertiary center
author Silva,Ana Cristina
author_facet Silva,Ana Cristina
Sampaio,Mónica
Marcos-Pinto,Ricardo
Lago,Paula
Rocha,Anabela
Matos,Eduarda
Santos,Marisa D.
author_role author
author2 Sampaio,Mónica
Marcos-Pinto,Ricardo
Lago,Paula
Rocha,Anabela
Matos,Eduarda
Santos,Marisa D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Ana Cristina
Sampaio,Mónica
Marcos-Pinto,Ricardo
Lago,Paula
Rocha,Anabela
Matos,Eduarda
Santos,Marisa D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ileal pouch anal anastomosis
Functional results
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Ulcerative colitis
Crohn's disease
topic Ileal pouch anal anastomosis
Functional results
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Ulcerative colitis
Crohn's disease
description ABSTRACT Background: Functional results after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis are variable. We assessed functional results in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and evaluated potential factors associated with poor functional results. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 38 patients who were submitted to a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, in the context of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, in at tertiary referral center, in the period between 1993 and 2013. Clinical records were analyzed and telephone interviews with protocoled questionnaire to 32 patients (12 ulcerative colitis, 20 familial adenomatous polyposis) were performed. Pouch functional results were also evaluated based in the Oresland score. The functional results were analyzed at four points of the patient outcome. Results: In 25 patients were performed restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and in 7 patients total colectomy preceded protectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Protective ileostomy was performed in all patients. There was no mortality and post-operative complications related with the pouch was 12.5% but treated conservatively. The mean follow-up was 13.2 years. Pouch failure occurs in 9.4% (2 in familial adenomatous polyposis and 1 in ulcerative colitis). Familial adenomatous polyposis patients achieved the best outcome but the outcome was acceptable in both groups. The median Oresland score was good with small variations over the years, although the best score being reached at 5 years after the surgery. Conclusions: The long-term results in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis were good in both groups, although better in familial adenomatous polyposis. In both, the best score of functional results seems to be reached at 5 years after surgery.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000100030
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000100030
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcol.2017.09.416
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.38 n.1 2018
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126478266400768