Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kotze,Paulo Gustavo
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Froehner Junior,Ilario, Freitas,Cristiano Denoni, Diniz,Fábio, Steckert-Filho,Álvaro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632011000300007
Resumo: There is no consensus on the ideal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy in ambulatory facilities. Spinal anesthesia and venous propofol associated with local perianal block (combined anesthesia) are frequently used, and their direct costs may be crucial for the anesthesia type selection. The objective of this study was to compare the direct costs of anesthesia-related materials in hemorrhoidectomy between these two anesthetic techniques.Retrospective and cross-section analysis, comparing the direct costs of the materials of spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block, in hemorrhoidectomy. Twenty patients were included, ten submitted to each anesthesia type (five from each gender). The mean age in the spinal anesthesia group was 46.5 years and in the combined anesthesia group, 42.5 years (p=0.334). The mean cost of anesthesia-related materials was R$ 58.50 (R$ 36.48 - R$ 85.79) in the first group versus R$ 190.31 (R$ 98.16 - R$ 358.51) in the second - 69.27% difference between them (p<0.001). The mean costs according to gender analysis were R$ 50.32 and R$ 66.69 (p=0.263) in the spinal anesthesia group versus R$ 222.52 and R$ 158.10 (p=0.221) in the combined anesthesia group, respectively. The direct costs of anesthesia-related materials were significantly lower in patients submitted to hemorrhoidectomy using spinal anesthesia. No difference was observed between the genders in each group analyzed.
id SBCP-1_57a65d640afe72c4f8d5bd16a0bb4feb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632011000300007
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomycosts and cost analysishemorrhoidsanesthesia, spinalanesthesia, intravenousanesthesia, localThere is no consensus on the ideal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy in ambulatory facilities. Spinal anesthesia and venous propofol associated with local perianal block (combined anesthesia) are frequently used, and their direct costs may be crucial for the anesthesia type selection. The objective of this study was to compare the direct costs of anesthesia-related materials in hemorrhoidectomy between these two anesthetic techniques.Retrospective and cross-section analysis, comparing the direct costs of the materials of spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block, in hemorrhoidectomy. Twenty patients were included, ten submitted to each anesthesia type (five from each gender). The mean age in the spinal anesthesia group was 46.5 years and in the combined anesthesia group, 42.5 years (p=0.334). The mean cost of anesthesia-related materials was R$ 58.50 (R$ 36.48 - R$ 85.79) in the first group versus R$ 190.31 (R$ 98.16 - R$ 358.51) in the second - 69.27% difference between them (p<0.001). The mean costs according to gender analysis were R$ 50.32 and R$ 66.69 (p=0.263) in the spinal anesthesia group versus R$ 222.52 and R$ 158.10 (p=0.221) in the combined anesthesia group, respectively. The direct costs of anesthesia-related materials were significantly lower in patients submitted to hemorrhoidectomy using spinal anesthesia. No difference was observed between the genders in each group analyzed.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2011-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632011000300007Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.31 n.3 2011reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1590/S2237-93632011000300007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKotze,Paulo GustavoFroehner Junior,IlarioFreitas,Cristiano DenoniDiniz,FábioSteckert-Filho,Álvaroeng2012-05-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632011000300007Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2012-05-07T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
title Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
spellingShingle Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
Kotze,Paulo Gustavo
costs and cost analysis
hemorrhoids
anesthesia, spinal
anesthesia, intravenous
anesthesia, local
title_short Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
title_full Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
title_fullStr Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
title_sort Analysis of direct costs of anesthesia-related materials between spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block in hemorrhoidectomy
author Kotze,Paulo Gustavo
author_facet Kotze,Paulo Gustavo
Froehner Junior,Ilario
Freitas,Cristiano Denoni
Diniz,Fábio
Steckert-Filho,Álvaro
author_role author
author2 Froehner Junior,Ilario
Freitas,Cristiano Denoni
Diniz,Fábio
Steckert-Filho,Álvaro
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kotze,Paulo Gustavo
Froehner Junior,Ilario
Freitas,Cristiano Denoni
Diniz,Fábio
Steckert-Filho,Álvaro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv costs and cost analysis
hemorrhoids
anesthesia, spinal
anesthesia, intravenous
anesthesia, local
topic costs and cost analysis
hemorrhoids
anesthesia, spinal
anesthesia, intravenous
anesthesia, local
description There is no consensus on the ideal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy in ambulatory facilities. Spinal anesthesia and venous propofol associated with local perianal block (combined anesthesia) are frequently used, and their direct costs may be crucial for the anesthesia type selection. The objective of this study was to compare the direct costs of anesthesia-related materials in hemorrhoidectomy between these two anesthetic techniques.Retrospective and cross-section analysis, comparing the direct costs of the materials of spinal and venous anesthesia with propofol associated with local perianal block, in hemorrhoidectomy. Twenty patients were included, ten submitted to each anesthesia type (five from each gender). The mean age in the spinal anesthesia group was 46.5 years and in the combined anesthesia group, 42.5 years (p=0.334). The mean cost of anesthesia-related materials was R$ 58.50 (R$ 36.48 - R$ 85.79) in the first group versus R$ 190.31 (R$ 98.16 - R$ 358.51) in the second - 69.27% difference between them (p<0.001). The mean costs according to gender analysis were R$ 50.32 and R$ 66.69 (p=0.263) in the spinal anesthesia group versus R$ 222.52 and R$ 158.10 (p=0.221) in the combined anesthesia group, respectively. The direct costs of anesthesia-related materials were significantly lower in patients submitted to hemorrhoidectomy using spinal anesthesia. No difference was observed between the genders in each group analyzed.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632011000300007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632011000300007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2237-93632011000300007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.31 n.3 2011
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126476943097856