Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Khatkov,Igor
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Pozdnyakov,Stepan, Atroshchenko,Andrey, Danilov,Mikhail, Chudnikh,Sergey, Abdulatipova,Zaira, Dolgopyatov,Igor, Saakjan,Georgi, Streltsov,Yuri, Yegorov,Vladimir
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000400267
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: To outline the preliminary experience of the da Vinci® robotic system used in a Moscow tertiary colorectal referral center for an unselected range of benign and malignant rectal conditions. Methods: Prospective non-randomized single-center study which analyzed results of 26 robotic rectal resections performed between january 2014 and december 2016. Results: The cohort included 10 females and 16 males (mean total age 61.6 years). Three patients underwent surgery for benign rectal villous adenomas. The median overall ASA score was 4 (ranged from 2 to 5). Of the surgeries, there were 19 total mesorectal excisions with 6 patients undergoing a multivisceral resection. The mean operating time was 358 minutes with a mean blood loss of 203 mL. All total mesorectal excision specimens were adjudged according Philip Quirke classification as mesorectal plane - Grade 3 with a mean of 18.5 lymph nodes identified (from 12 to 35). Of these there were 10 patients (38.5%) with lymph node metastases. After surgery the average pain score was 2.1 out of 10 on the “Visual-Analogue Pain Intensity Scale” and 1.5 score out of 10 on the “Brief Pain Inventory with Quality of Life”. Anal continency after rectal resection with total mesorectal excisions estimated according Wexner Scale: 10 days after surgery average score was -3.1 and a 6 month after surgery -1.6 score. The median length of hospital stay was 11 days (from 10 to 15). Conclusion: Our initial experience with a totally robotic rectal resection has shown the technique to be safe and feasible, particularly in patients where conventional laparoscopic rectal resection would be anticipated to be challenging.
id SBCP-1_7391176aca15ba68a31f4613c5fb6526
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632018000400267
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experienceRobotic surgeryRectal cancerColorectal surgeryABSTRACT Purpose: To outline the preliminary experience of the da Vinci® robotic system used in a Moscow tertiary colorectal referral center for an unselected range of benign and malignant rectal conditions. Methods: Prospective non-randomized single-center study which analyzed results of 26 robotic rectal resections performed between january 2014 and december 2016. Results: The cohort included 10 females and 16 males (mean total age 61.6 years). Three patients underwent surgery for benign rectal villous adenomas. The median overall ASA score was 4 (ranged from 2 to 5). Of the surgeries, there were 19 total mesorectal excisions with 6 patients undergoing a multivisceral resection. The mean operating time was 358 minutes with a mean blood loss of 203 mL. All total mesorectal excision specimens were adjudged according Philip Quirke classification as mesorectal plane - Grade 3 with a mean of 18.5 lymph nodes identified (from 12 to 35). Of these there were 10 patients (38.5%) with lymph node metastases. After surgery the average pain score was 2.1 out of 10 on the “Visual-Analogue Pain Intensity Scale” and 1.5 score out of 10 on the “Brief Pain Inventory with Quality of Life”. Anal continency after rectal resection with total mesorectal excisions estimated according Wexner Scale: 10 days after surgery average score was -3.1 and a 6 month after surgery -1.6 score. The median length of hospital stay was 11 days (from 10 to 15). Conclusion: Our initial experience with a totally robotic rectal resection has shown the technique to be safe and feasible, particularly in patients where conventional laparoscopic rectal resection would be anticipated to be challenging.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000400267Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.38 n.4 2018reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1016/j.jcol.2018.05.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKhatkov,IgorPozdnyakov,StepanAtroshchenko,AndreyDanilov,MikhailChudnikh,SergeyAbdulatipova,ZairaDolgopyatov,IgorSaakjan,GeorgiStreltsov,YuriYegorov,Vladimireng2018-11-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632018000400267Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2018-11-23T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
title Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
spellingShingle Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
Khatkov,Igor
Robotic surgery
Rectal cancer
Colorectal surgery
title_short Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
title_full Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
title_fullStr Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
title_full_unstemmed Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
title_sort Robotic rectal resection: preliminary Russian experience
author Khatkov,Igor
author_facet Khatkov,Igor
Pozdnyakov,Stepan
Atroshchenko,Andrey
Danilov,Mikhail
Chudnikh,Sergey
Abdulatipova,Zaira
Dolgopyatov,Igor
Saakjan,Georgi
Streltsov,Yuri
Yegorov,Vladimir
author_role author
author2 Pozdnyakov,Stepan
Atroshchenko,Andrey
Danilov,Mikhail
Chudnikh,Sergey
Abdulatipova,Zaira
Dolgopyatov,Igor
Saakjan,Georgi
Streltsov,Yuri
Yegorov,Vladimir
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Khatkov,Igor
Pozdnyakov,Stepan
Atroshchenko,Andrey
Danilov,Mikhail
Chudnikh,Sergey
Abdulatipova,Zaira
Dolgopyatov,Igor
Saakjan,Georgi
Streltsov,Yuri
Yegorov,Vladimir
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Robotic surgery
Rectal cancer
Colorectal surgery
topic Robotic surgery
Rectal cancer
Colorectal surgery
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To outline the preliminary experience of the da Vinci® robotic system used in a Moscow tertiary colorectal referral center for an unselected range of benign and malignant rectal conditions. Methods: Prospective non-randomized single-center study which analyzed results of 26 robotic rectal resections performed between january 2014 and december 2016. Results: The cohort included 10 females and 16 males (mean total age 61.6 years). Three patients underwent surgery for benign rectal villous adenomas. The median overall ASA score was 4 (ranged from 2 to 5). Of the surgeries, there were 19 total mesorectal excisions with 6 patients undergoing a multivisceral resection. The mean operating time was 358 minutes with a mean blood loss of 203 mL. All total mesorectal excision specimens were adjudged according Philip Quirke classification as mesorectal plane - Grade 3 with a mean of 18.5 lymph nodes identified (from 12 to 35). Of these there were 10 patients (38.5%) with lymph node metastases. After surgery the average pain score was 2.1 out of 10 on the “Visual-Analogue Pain Intensity Scale” and 1.5 score out of 10 on the “Brief Pain Inventory with Quality of Life”. Anal continency after rectal resection with total mesorectal excisions estimated according Wexner Scale: 10 days after surgery average score was -3.1 and a 6 month after surgery -1.6 score. The median length of hospital stay was 11 days (from 10 to 15). Conclusion: Our initial experience with a totally robotic rectal resection has shown the technique to be safe and feasible, particularly in patients where conventional laparoscopic rectal resection would be anticipated to be challenging.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000400267
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632018000400267
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcol.2018.05.006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.38 n.4 2018
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126478336655360