Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De la Pinta,Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Martín,Margarita, Hervás,Asunción, Perna,Luis Cristian, Fernández-Lizarbe,Eva, López,Fernando, Duque,Víctor Jose, Sancho,Sonsoles
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000200112
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose Standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. This study identified predictive factors for tumour response in our series. Patients and methods Between January 2005 and December 2018, 292 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemo-radiation before surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation dose was 50.4 Gy with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens. Patients-tumour and treatment-factors were tested for influence on tumour down staging and regression grade using Mandard scoring system on surgical specimens (TRG). Results Median age was 69 years (range 39-87); 33.9% of patients was Stage II and 54.5% Stage IIIB. Tumour down staging occurred in 211 patients (73%), including 63 patients (21.6%) with ypT0 (documented T0 at surgery) and 148 patients (50.7%) with a satisfactory tumour regression grade defined as TRG2‒3. Upper rectal tumours were identified to predictive factors for pathologic complete response by univariate analysis (p = 0.002). TRG1‒3 was associated with intervals from chemo-radiation to surgery (p = 0.004); TRG1‒3 rates were higher with longer intervals: 1.71% in ≤ 5 weeks, 23.63% in 6-8 weeks and 46.9% in ≥ 9 weeks; and PTV 50.4 ≥ 800cc (p = 0.06); 3 and 5 years survivals were 85% and 90% for the group as a whole. Among ypT0 cases, the overall survival was 91.1% without significantly different (p = 0.25) compared with the remaining group, 87.2%. Among ypT0 cases, the relapse-free survival was 94.5%, with significantly different (p = 0.03) compared with the remaining group 78.2%. There were no treatment-associated fatalities. Thirty-two patients (10.96%) experienced Grade III/IV toxicities (proctitis, ephitelitis and neutropenia). Conclusions Tumour localization was identified as predictive factors of pathologic complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemo-radiation. Upper rectal tumours are more likely to develop complete responses. Delay in surgery was identified as a favorable predictive factor for TRG1‒3. The relapse-free survival in pathologic complete response group was higher compared with non-pathologic complete response.
id SBCP-1_76c68a27daec77592c03ef77610b0517
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632020000200112
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinomaRectal cancerNeoadjuvant treatmentChemoradiotherapyABSTRACT Purpose Standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. This study identified predictive factors for tumour response in our series. Patients and methods Between January 2005 and December 2018, 292 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemo-radiation before surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation dose was 50.4 Gy with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens. Patients-tumour and treatment-factors were tested for influence on tumour down staging and regression grade using Mandard scoring system on surgical specimens (TRG). Results Median age was 69 years (range 39-87); 33.9% of patients was Stage II and 54.5% Stage IIIB. Tumour down staging occurred in 211 patients (73%), including 63 patients (21.6%) with ypT0 (documented T0 at surgery) and 148 patients (50.7%) with a satisfactory tumour regression grade defined as TRG2‒3. Upper rectal tumours were identified to predictive factors for pathologic complete response by univariate analysis (p = 0.002). TRG1‒3 was associated with intervals from chemo-radiation to surgery (p = 0.004); TRG1‒3 rates were higher with longer intervals: 1.71% in ≤ 5 weeks, 23.63% in 6-8 weeks and 46.9% in ≥ 9 weeks; and PTV 50.4 ≥ 800cc (p = 0.06); 3 and 5 years survivals were 85% and 90% for the group as a whole. Among ypT0 cases, the overall survival was 91.1% without significantly different (p = 0.25) compared with the remaining group, 87.2%. Among ypT0 cases, the relapse-free survival was 94.5%, with significantly different (p = 0.03) compared with the remaining group 78.2%. There were no treatment-associated fatalities. Thirty-two patients (10.96%) experienced Grade III/IV toxicities (proctitis, ephitelitis and neutropenia). Conclusions Tumour localization was identified as predictive factors of pathologic complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemo-radiation. Upper rectal tumours are more likely to develop complete responses. Delay in surgery was identified as a favorable predictive factor for TRG1‒3. The relapse-free survival in pathologic complete response group was higher compared with non-pathologic complete response.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000200112Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.40 n.2 2020reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1016/j.jcol.2019.10.013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDe la Pinta,CarolinaMartín,MargaritaHervás,AsunciónPerna,Luis CristianFernández-Lizarbe,EvaLópez,FernandoDuque,Víctor JoseSancho,Sonsoleseng2020-06-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632020000200112Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2020-06-08T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
title Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
spellingShingle Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
De la Pinta,Carolina
Rectal cancer
Neoadjuvant treatment
Chemoradiotherapy
title_short Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
title_full Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
title_sort Predictive factors for tumour response after the neoadjuvant-treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma
author De la Pinta,Carolina
author_facet De la Pinta,Carolina
Martín,Margarita
Hervás,Asunción
Perna,Luis Cristian
Fernández-Lizarbe,Eva
López,Fernando
Duque,Víctor Jose
Sancho,Sonsoles
author_role author
author2 Martín,Margarita
Hervás,Asunción
Perna,Luis Cristian
Fernández-Lizarbe,Eva
López,Fernando
Duque,Víctor Jose
Sancho,Sonsoles
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De la Pinta,Carolina
Martín,Margarita
Hervás,Asunción
Perna,Luis Cristian
Fernández-Lizarbe,Eva
López,Fernando
Duque,Víctor Jose
Sancho,Sonsoles
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rectal cancer
Neoadjuvant treatment
Chemoradiotherapy
topic Rectal cancer
Neoadjuvant treatment
Chemoradiotherapy
description ABSTRACT Purpose Standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. This study identified predictive factors for tumour response in our series. Patients and methods Between January 2005 and December 2018, 292 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemo-radiation before surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation dose was 50.4 Gy with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens. Patients-tumour and treatment-factors were tested for influence on tumour down staging and regression grade using Mandard scoring system on surgical specimens (TRG). Results Median age was 69 years (range 39-87); 33.9% of patients was Stage II and 54.5% Stage IIIB. Tumour down staging occurred in 211 patients (73%), including 63 patients (21.6%) with ypT0 (documented T0 at surgery) and 148 patients (50.7%) with a satisfactory tumour regression grade defined as TRG2‒3. Upper rectal tumours were identified to predictive factors for pathologic complete response by univariate analysis (p = 0.002). TRG1‒3 was associated with intervals from chemo-radiation to surgery (p = 0.004); TRG1‒3 rates were higher with longer intervals: 1.71% in ≤ 5 weeks, 23.63% in 6-8 weeks and 46.9% in ≥ 9 weeks; and PTV 50.4 ≥ 800cc (p = 0.06); 3 and 5 years survivals were 85% and 90% for the group as a whole. Among ypT0 cases, the overall survival was 91.1% without significantly different (p = 0.25) compared with the remaining group, 87.2%. Among ypT0 cases, the relapse-free survival was 94.5%, with significantly different (p = 0.03) compared with the remaining group 78.2%. There were no treatment-associated fatalities. Thirty-two patients (10.96%) experienced Grade III/IV toxicities (proctitis, ephitelitis and neutropenia). Conclusions Tumour localization was identified as predictive factors of pathologic complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemo-radiation. Upper rectal tumours are more likely to develop complete responses. Delay in surgery was identified as a favorable predictive factor for TRG1‒3. The relapse-free survival in pathologic complete response group was higher compared with non-pathologic complete response.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000200112
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000200112
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcol.2019.10.013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.40 n.2 2020
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126478764474368