Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Carlos Henrique Marques dos
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Santos Filho,Kerginaldo Gondim dos, Cassino,Pedro Carvalho, Chiquetti,Camila Vieira, Mello,Alvaro Pereira de, Dourado,Doroty Mesquita
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632017000400263
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Intestinal anastomosis is a surgical practice constantly realized by surgeons worldwide. When the option is to perform manual anastomosis, which is still widely used for its low cost, the question arises as to the best material to be applied. Objective: To compare polydioxanone and polyglactin threads for healing and tensile strength in intestinal anastomosis in rats. Method: We used 25 rats Wistar; after anesthesia, in groups A and B (10 rats each), laparotomy was performed, transection of the ileum at 5 and 10 cm proximally to the ileocecal valve; in group A, anastomosis was performed with 4 separate extra mucosal sutures with polidioxanone; in group B, anastomosis was performed with polyglactin; in group C (5 rats), laparotomy and manipulation of the ileum were performed. After 21 days, the animals were anesthetized and submitted to euthanasia. The specimens were sent for histopathological study and tensile strength analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Turkey and Student's t tests, with a significance of p < 0.05. Results: The results showed that in the tensile strength analysis, there were no significant differences between them. The histological analysis showed significant differences between the cicatrization pattern, where polydioxanone caused less fibrosis than polyglactin. Conclusion: Polydioxanone caused less fibrosis than polyglactin in intestinal anastomoses of rats.
id SBCP-1_82580dda776057e5abb6e225a12e9027
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632017000400263
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomosesAnastomosis, surgicalPolydioxanonePolyglactin 910RatsSmall intestineABSTRACT Introduction: Intestinal anastomosis is a surgical practice constantly realized by surgeons worldwide. When the option is to perform manual anastomosis, which is still widely used for its low cost, the question arises as to the best material to be applied. Objective: To compare polydioxanone and polyglactin threads for healing and tensile strength in intestinal anastomosis in rats. Method: We used 25 rats Wistar; after anesthesia, in groups A and B (10 rats each), laparotomy was performed, transection of the ileum at 5 and 10 cm proximally to the ileocecal valve; in group A, anastomosis was performed with 4 separate extra mucosal sutures with polidioxanone; in group B, anastomosis was performed with polyglactin; in group C (5 rats), laparotomy and manipulation of the ileum were performed. After 21 days, the animals were anesthetized and submitted to euthanasia. The specimens were sent for histopathological study and tensile strength analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Turkey and Student's t tests, with a significance of p < 0.05. Results: The results showed that in the tensile strength analysis, there were no significant differences between them. The histological analysis showed significant differences between the cicatrization pattern, where polydioxanone caused less fibrosis than polyglactin. Conclusion: Polydioxanone caused less fibrosis than polyglactin in intestinal anastomoses of rats.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632017000400263Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.37 n.4 2017reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1016/j.jcol.2017.05.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Carlos Henrique Marques dosSantos Filho,Kerginaldo Gondim dosCassino,Pedro CarvalhoChiquetti,Camila VieiraMello,Alvaro Pereira deDourado,Doroty Mesquitaeng2017-12-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632017000400263Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2017-12-13T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
title Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
spellingShingle Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
Santos,Carlos Henrique Marques dos
Anastomosis, surgical
Polydioxanone
Polyglactin 910
Rats
Small intestine
title_short Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
title_full Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
title_fullStr Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
title_full_unstemmed Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
title_sort Differences between polydioxanone and poliglactin in intestinal anastomoses - a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses
author Santos,Carlos Henrique Marques dos
author_facet Santos,Carlos Henrique Marques dos
Santos Filho,Kerginaldo Gondim dos
Cassino,Pedro Carvalho
Chiquetti,Camila Vieira
Mello,Alvaro Pereira de
Dourado,Doroty Mesquita
author_role author
author2 Santos Filho,Kerginaldo Gondim dos
Cassino,Pedro Carvalho
Chiquetti,Camila Vieira
Mello,Alvaro Pereira de
Dourado,Doroty Mesquita
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Carlos Henrique Marques dos
Santos Filho,Kerginaldo Gondim dos
Cassino,Pedro Carvalho
Chiquetti,Camila Vieira
Mello,Alvaro Pereira de
Dourado,Doroty Mesquita
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anastomosis, surgical
Polydioxanone
Polyglactin 910
Rats
Small intestine
topic Anastomosis, surgical
Polydioxanone
Polyglactin 910
Rats
Small intestine
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Intestinal anastomosis is a surgical practice constantly realized by surgeons worldwide. When the option is to perform manual anastomosis, which is still widely used for its low cost, the question arises as to the best material to be applied. Objective: To compare polydioxanone and polyglactin threads for healing and tensile strength in intestinal anastomosis in rats. Method: We used 25 rats Wistar; after anesthesia, in groups A and B (10 rats each), laparotomy was performed, transection of the ileum at 5 and 10 cm proximally to the ileocecal valve; in group A, anastomosis was performed with 4 separate extra mucosal sutures with polidioxanone; in group B, anastomosis was performed with polyglactin; in group C (5 rats), laparotomy and manipulation of the ileum were performed. After 21 days, the animals were anesthetized and submitted to euthanasia. The specimens were sent for histopathological study and tensile strength analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Turkey and Student's t tests, with a significance of p < 0.05. Results: The results showed that in the tensile strength analysis, there were no significant differences between them. The histological analysis showed significant differences between the cicatrization pattern, where polydioxanone caused less fibrosis than polyglactin. Conclusion: Polydioxanone caused less fibrosis than polyglactin in intestinal anastomoses of rats.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632017000400263
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632017000400263
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcol.2017.05.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.37 n.4 2017
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126478229700608