Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632016000300157 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective Evaluate healing response of colo-colic anastomosis by invagination vs. single-layer suture. Methods Sixty dogs were randomly distributed in two groups and anastomosed with single-layer suture (G-I, control) or by invagination and cardinal sutures (G-II, study). In the end, the animals were euthanized (10 from each group on POD7 and 20 on POD21) and the anastomosed segment was retrieved for histology and immunohistochemistry. Parameters included body weight, adhesions, edema, vasoproliferation, type I and III collagen, myeloperoxidase and nitric oxide. Findings were analyzed with Student's t test and the Mann–Whitney test. Results No animal died prior to euthanasia. The groups were similar with regard to all parameters: median weight 10.86 kg (G-I) and 9.98 kg (G-II) on POD7 (p = 0.41) and 11.86 kg (G-I) and 11.55 kg (G-II) on POD21 (p = 0.71); abdominal adhesions (p = 0.7383 POD7; p = 0.5685 POD21), level of edema (p = 0.3006 POD7; p = 0.7990 POD21), vasoproliferation (p = 0.1191 POD7; p = 0.0758 POD21), type I collagen (p = 0.4591 POD7; p = 0.3357 POD21), type III collagen (p = 0.2166 POD7; p = 0.2712 POD21), nitric oxide (p = 0.3980 POD7; p = 0.4796 POD21) and myeloperoxidase (p = 0.580 POD7; p = 0.755 POD21). Conclusion No significant difference in healing response was observed between the two anastomosis techniques (single-layer suture and invagination). |
id |
SBCP-1_8ed6958c0dc504ce220de1a2397fee0a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2237-93632016000300157 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogsAnastomosisWound HealingColonAbstract Objective Evaluate healing response of colo-colic anastomosis by invagination vs. single-layer suture. Methods Sixty dogs were randomly distributed in two groups and anastomosed with single-layer suture (G-I, control) or by invagination and cardinal sutures (G-II, study). In the end, the animals were euthanized (10 from each group on POD7 and 20 on POD21) and the anastomosed segment was retrieved for histology and immunohistochemistry. Parameters included body weight, adhesions, edema, vasoproliferation, type I and III collagen, myeloperoxidase and nitric oxide. Findings were analyzed with Student's t test and the Mann–Whitney test. Results No animal died prior to euthanasia. The groups were similar with regard to all parameters: median weight 10.86 kg (G-I) and 9.98 kg (G-II) on POD7 (p = 0.41) and 11.86 kg (G-I) and 11.55 kg (G-II) on POD21 (p = 0.71); abdominal adhesions (p = 0.7383 POD7; p = 0.5685 POD21), level of edema (p = 0.3006 POD7; p = 0.7990 POD21), vasoproliferation (p = 0.1191 POD7; p = 0.0758 POD21), type I collagen (p = 0.4591 POD7; p = 0.3357 POD21), type III collagen (p = 0.2166 POD7; p = 0.2712 POD21), nitric oxide (p = 0.3980 POD7; p = 0.4796 POD21) and myeloperoxidase (p = 0.580 POD7; p = 0.755 POD21). Conclusion No significant difference in healing response was observed between the two anastomosis techniques (single-layer suture and invagination).Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632016000300157Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.36 n.3 2016reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1016/j.jcol.2016.04.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNogueira,Miguel Augusto ArcoverdeRegadas,Francisco Sérgio PinheiroBezerra,Carlos Renato SalesFigueiredo,Welligton RibeiroFilho,Erbert Portela Martinseng2016-10-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632016000300157Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2016-10-07T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs |
title |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs |
spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs Nogueira,Miguel Augusto Arcoverde Anastomosis Wound Healing Colon |
title_short |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs |
title_full |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs |
title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs |
title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of healing response between colo-colic invagination anastomosis and single-layer running suture. Experimental study in dogs |
author |
Nogueira,Miguel Augusto Arcoverde |
author_facet |
Nogueira,Miguel Augusto Arcoverde Regadas,Francisco Sérgio Pinheiro Bezerra,Carlos Renato Sales Figueiredo,Welligton Ribeiro Filho,Erbert Portela Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Regadas,Francisco Sérgio Pinheiro Bezerra,Carlos Renato Sales Figueiredo,Welligton Ribeiro Filho,Erbert Portela Martins |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nogueira,Miguel Augusto Arcoverde Regadas,Francisco Sérgio Pinheiro Bezerra,Carlos Renato Sales Figueiredo,Welligton Ribeiro Filho,Erbert Portela Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anastomosis Wound Healing Colon |
topic |
Anastomosis Wound Healing Colon |
description |
Abstract Objective Evaluate healing response of colo-colic anastomosis by invagination vs. single-layer suture. Methods Sixty dogs were randomly distributed in two groups and anastomosed with single-layer suture (G-I, control) or by invagination and cardinal sutures (G-II, study). In the end, the animals were euthanized (10 from each group on POD7 and 20 on POD21) and the anastomosed segment was retrieved for histology and immunohistochemistry. Parameters included body weight, adhesions, edema, vasoproliferation, type I and III collagen, myeloperoxidase and nitric oxide. Findings were analyzed with Student's t test and the Mann–Whitney test. Results No animal died prior to euthanasia. The groups were similar with regard to all parameters: median weight 10.86 kg (G-I) and 9.98 kg (G-II) on POD7 (p = 0.41) and 11.86 kg (G-I) and 11.55 kg (G-II) on POD21 (p = 0.71); abdominal adhesions (p = 0.7383 POD7; p = 0.5685 POD21), level of edema (p = 0.3006 POD7; p = 0.7990 POD21), vasoproliferation (p = 0.1191 POD7; p = 0.0758 POD21), type I collagen (p = 0.4591 POD7; p = 0.3357 POD21), type III collagen (p = 0.2166 POD7; p = 0.2712 POD21), nitric oxide (p = 0.3980 POD7; p = 0.4796 POD21) and myeloperoxidase (p = 0.580 POD7; p = 0.755 POD21). Conclusion No significant difference in healing response was observed between the two anastomosis techniques (single-layer suture and invagination). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632016000300157 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632016000300157 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jcol.2016.04.008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.36 n.3 2016 reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) instacron:SBCP |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) |
instacron_str |
SBCP |
institution |
SBCP |
reponame_str |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbcp@sbcp.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126477860601856 |