Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000400348 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background In transanalminimally-invasive surgery (TAMIS), the closure of the rectal defect is controversial, and endoluminal suture is one of the most challenging aspects. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the short- andmedium-term complications of a consecutive series of patients with extraperitoneal rectal injuries who underwent TAMIS without closure of the rectal defect. Materials and Methods A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study conducted between August 2013 and July 2019 in which all patients with extraperitoneal rectal lesions, who were operated on using the TAMIS technique, were consecutively included. The lesions were: benign lesions ≥ 3 cm; neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 2 cm; adenocarcinomas in stage T1N0; and adenocarcinomas in stage T2N0, with high surgical risk, or with the patients reluctant to undergo radical surgery, and others with doubts about complete remission after the neoadjuvant therapy. Bleeding, infectious complications, rectal stenosis, perforations, and death were evaluated. Results A total of 35 patients were treated using TAMIS without closure of the defect. The average size of the lesionswas of 3.68±2.1 cm(95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.7cmto 9 cm), their average distance from the anal margin was of 5.7±1.48cm, and the average operative time was of 39.2±20.5 minutes, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 1 year. As for the pathologies, they were: 15 adenomas; 3 carcinoid tumors; and 17 adenocarcinomas. In all cases, the rectal defect was left open. The overall morbidity was of 14.2%. Two patients (grade II in the Clavien-Dindo classification) were readmitted for pain treatment, and three patients (grade III in the Clavien-Dindo classification) were assisted due to postoperative bleeding, one of whom required reoperation. Conclusion The TAMIS technique without closure of the rectal defect yields good results, and present a high feasibility and low complication rate. |
id |
SBCP-1_bcb6323494becb9a6f6d87d76f2c64e2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2237-93632021000400348 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal DefectTAMIStransanal surgeryclosurerectal defectcomplicationsAbstract Background In transanalminimally-invasive surgery (TAMIS), the closure of the rectal defect is controversial, and endoluminal suture is one of the most challenging aspects. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the short- andmedium-term complications of a consecutive series of patients with extraperitoneal rectal injuries who underwent TAMIS without closure of the rectal defect. Materials and Methods A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study conducted between August 2013 and July 2019 in which all patients with extraperitoneal rectal lesions, who were operated on using the TAMIS technique, were consecutively included. The lesions were: benign lesions ≥ 3 cm; neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 2 cm; adenocarcinomas in stage T1N0; and adenocarcinomas in stage T2N0, with high surgical risk, or with the patients reluctant to undergo radical surgery, and others with doubts about complete remission after the neoadjuvant therapy. Bleeding, infectious complications, rectal stenosis, perforations, and death were evaluated. Results A total of 35 patients were treated using TAMIS without closure of the defect. The average size of the lesionswas of 3.68±2.1 cm(95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.7cmto 9 cm), their average distance from the anal margin was of 5.7±1.48cm, and the average operative time was of 39.2±20.5 minutes, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 1 year. As for the pathologies, they were: 15 adenomas; 3 carcinoid tumors; and 17 adenocarcinomas. In all cases, the rectal defect was left open. The overall morbidity was of 14.2%. Two patients (grade II in the Clavien-Dindo classification) were readmitted for pain treatment, and three patients (grade III in the Clavien-Dindo classification) were assisted due to postoperative bleeding, one of whom required reoperation. Conclusion The TAMIS technique without closure of the rectal defect yields good results, and present a high feasibility and low complication rate.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000400348Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.41 n.4 2021reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1055/s-0041-1735642info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNaiderman,DiegoTufare,Ana LauraTrinchero,Lady BeatrizRossi,FernandoDolan,MartínCano,Diego MartínFagalde,Rafael LópezJury,Gastón Leonardoeng2022-01-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632021000400348Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2022-01-20T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect |
title |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect |
spellingShingle |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect Naiderman,Diego TAMIS transanal surgery closure rectal defect complications |
title_short |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect |
title_full |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect |
title_fullStr |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect |
title_sort |
Transanal Minimally-Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Experience with No Closure of the Rectal Defect |
author |
Naiderman,Diego |
author_facet |
Naiderman,Diego Tufare,Ana Laura Trinchero,Lady Beatriz Rossi,Fernando Dolan,Martín Cano,Diego Martín Fagalde,Rafael López Jury,Gastón Leonardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tufare,Ana Laura Trinchero,Lady Beatriz Rossi,Fernando Dolan,Martín Cano,Diego Martín Fagalde,Rafael López Jury,Gastón Leonardo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Naiderman,Diego Tufare,Ana Laura Trinchero,Lady Beatriz Rossi,Fernando Dolan,Martín Cano,Diego Martín Fagalde,Rafael López Jury,Gastón Leonardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
TAMIS transanal surgery closure rectal defect complications |
topic |
TAMIS transanal surgery closure rectal defect complications |
description |
Abstract Background In transanalminimally-invasive surgery (TAMIS), the closure of the rectal defect is controversial, and endoluminal suture is one of the most challenging aspects. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the short- andmedium-term complications of a consecutive series of patients with extraperitoneal rectal injuries who underwent TAMIS without closure of the rectal defect. Materials and Methods A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study conducted between August 2013 and July 2019 in which all patients with extraperitoneal rectal lesions, who were operated on using the TAMIS technique, were consecutively included. The lesions were: benign lesions ≥ 3 cm; neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 2 cm; adenocarcinomas in stage T1N0; and adenocarcinomas in stage T2N0, with high surgical risk, or with the patients reluctant to undergo radical surgery, and others with doubts about complete remission after the neoadjuvant therapy. Bleeding, infectious complications, rectal stenosis, perforations, and death were evaluated. Results A total of 35 patients were treated using TAMIS without closure of the defect. The average size of the lesionswas of 3.68±2.1 cm(95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.7cmto 9 cm), their average distance from the anal margin was of 5.7±1.48cm, and the average operative time was of 39.2±20.5 minutes, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 1 year. As for the pathologies, they were: 15 adenomas; 3 carcinoid tumors; and 17 adenocarcinomas. In all cases, the rectal defect was left open. The overall morbidity was of 14.2%. Two patients (grade II in the Clavien-Dindo classification) were readmitted for pain treatment, and three patients (grade III in the Clavien-Dindo classification) were assisted due to postoperative bleeding, one of whom required reoperation. Conclusion The TAMIS technique without closure of the rectal defect yields good results, and present a high feasibility and low complication rate. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000400348 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632021000400348 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0041-1735642 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.41 n.4 2021 reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) instacron:SBCP |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) |
instacron_str |
SBCP |
institution |
SBCP |
reponame_str |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbcp@sbcp.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126479244722176 |