A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632022000100047 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background There are many surgical approaches which described extent of resection of the colon for adequate surgicalmanagement of splenic flexure cancer, but up till now there is no established surgical procedure, this is because the presence of double lymphatic drainage of themesenteric vessels. Segmental resection of the colon for the management of splenic flexure cancer was a recently accepted surgical procedure. Objective In the present study, we aimed to compare three surgical management techniques to clarify the best management approach of Egyptian patients with splenic flexure cancer regarding operative, clinical, and oncological outcomes: segmental resection, and extended left or right hemicolectomy,. Materials and Methods In the present study, we included 90 patients with splenic flexure cancer. Cases were divided into 3 groups. Each group included 30 patients in order to compare three surgical techniques: segmental resection, extended left hemicolectomy, and extended right hemicolectomy. Results We have found no statistically significant differences between the three included groups regarding operative findings, postoperative complications, local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease progression, recurrence-free survival rate, progression-free survival rate, and overall survival rate. The operative time was longer, and the number of lymph nodes was higher in the extended right hemicolectomy group (p<0.001). Conclusion We have shown that segmental resection of the splenic flexure is surgically and clinically suitable for the adequate management of operable cases of carcinoma of the splenic flexure. |
id |
SBCP-1_ddde87076b3f3dcd4393ad9858ef2008 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2237-93632022000100047 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancersplenic flexure cancersurgerysegmental resectionoutcomeAbstract Background There are many surgical approaches which described extent of resection of the colon for adequate surgicalmanagement of splenic flexure cancer, but up till now there is no established surgical procedure, this is because the presence of double lymphatic drainage of themesenteric vessels. Segmental resection of the colon for the management of splenic flexure cancer was a recently accepted surgical procedure. Objective In the present study, we aimed to compare three surgical management techniques to clarify the best management approach of Egyptian patients with splenic flexure cancer regarding operative, clinical, and oncological outcomes: segmental resection, and extended left or right hemicolectomy,. Materials and Methods In the present study, we included 90 patients with splenic flexure cancer. Cases were divided into 3 groups. Each group included 30 patients in order to compare three surgical techniques: segmental resection, extended left hemicolectomy, and extended right hemicolectomy. Results We have found no statistically significant differences between the three included groups regarding operative findings, postoperative complications, local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease progression, recurrence-free survival rate, progression-free survival rate, and overall survival rate. The operative time was longer, and the number of lymph nodes was higher in the extended right hemicolectomy group (p<0.001). Conclusion We have shown that segmental resection of the splenic flexure is surgically and clinically suitable for the adequate management of operable cases of carcinoma of the splenic flexure.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632022000100047Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.42 n.1 2022reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1055/s-0041-1740201info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEl-Hendawy,Elsayed I.Amin,Mohamed FaroukFahmy,Ahmed M.Alattar,Ahmed Z.Elshorbagy,ShereenHarb,Ola A.Gomaa,Ahmed FathyEmbaby,AhmedElsayed,Ahmed M.Osman,GamalAli,Ramadan M.eng2022-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632022000100047Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2022-06-01T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer |
title |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer |
spellingShingle |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer El-Hendawy,Elsayed I. splenic flexure cancer surgery segmental resection outcome |
title_short |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer |
title_full |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer |
title_sort |
A Comparison between Different Management Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Splenic Flexure Colon Cancer |
author |
El-Hendawy,Elsayed I. |
author_facet |
El-Hendawy,Elsayed I. Amin,Mohamed Farouk Fahmy,Ahmed M. Alattar,Ahmed Z. Elshorbagy,Shereen Harb,Ola A. Gomaa,Ahmed Fathy Embaby,Ahmed Elsayed,Ahmed M. Osman,Gamal Ali,Ramadan M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Amin,Mohamed Farouk Fahmy,Ahmed M. Alattar,Ahmed Z. Elshorbagy,Shereen Harb,Ola A. Gomaa,Ahmed Fathy Embaby,Ahmed Elsayed,Ahmed M. Osman,Gamal Ali,Ramadan M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
El-Hendawy,Elsayed I. Amin,Mohamed Farouk Fahmy,Ahmed M. Alattar,Ahmed Z. Elshorbagy,Shereen Harb,Ola A. Gomaa,Ahmed Fathy Embaby,Ahmed Elsayed,Ahmed M. Osman,Gamal Ali,Ramadan M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
splenic flexure cancer surgery segmental resection outcome |
topic |
splenic flexure cancer surgery segmental resection outcome |
description |
Abstract Background There are many surgical approaches which described extent of resection of the colon for adequate surgicalmanagement of splenic flexure cancer, but up till now there is no established surgical procedure, this is because the presence of double lymphatic drainage of themesenteric vessels. Segmental resection of the colon for the management of splenic flexure cancer was a recently accepted surgical procedure. Objective In the present study, we aimed to compare three surgical management techniques to clarify the best management approach of Egyptian patients with splenic flexure cancer regarding operative, clinical, and oncological outcomes: segmental resection, and extended left or right hemicolectomy,. Materials and Methods In the present study, we included 90 patients with splenic flexure cancer. Cases were divided into 3 groups. Each group included 30 patients in order to compare three surgical techniques: segmental resection, extended left hemicolectomy, and extended right hemicolectomy. Results We have found no statistically significant differences between the three included groups regarding operative findings, postoperative complications, local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease progression, recurrence-free survival rate, progression-free survival rate, and overall survival rate. The operative time was longer, and the number of lymph nodes was higher in the extended right hemicolectomy group (p<0.001). Conclusion We have shown that segmental resection of the splenic flexure is surgically and clinically suitable for the adequate management of operable cases of carcinoma of the splenic flexure. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632022000100047 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632022000100047 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0041-1740201 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.42 n.1 2022 reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) instacron:SBCP |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) |
instacron_str |
SBCP |
institution |
SBCP |
reponame_str |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbcp@sbcp.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126479290859520 |