CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: GITSOPOULOS,T.K.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: DAMALAS,C.A., GEORGOULAS,I.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582017000100262
Resumo: ABSTRACT Silverleaf nightshade is a difficult-to-control perennial weed. Field experiments were conducted in northern Greece to evaluate the control of silverleaf nightshade with POST applications of glufosinate (1,500 g a.i. ha-1), glyphosate (3,600 g a.i. ha-1), tembotrione (148.5 g a.i. ha-1), and a mixture of tembotrione plus bentazon (148.5 plus 1,440 g a.i. ha-1) at an early vegetative stage (plant height 10-15 cm) and at the beginning of flowering (plant height 30-50 cm). Glufosinate provided > 95% control of silverleaf nightshade from 7 to 39 days after treatment (DAT), regardless of the vegetative stage at herbicide application. Similarly, glyphosate provided up to 90% control around 39 DAT at either growth stage applied, exhibiting gradually increasing efficacy. Tembotrione alone controlled silverleaf nightshade 85% when applied at the early vegetative stage and 48% when applied at the beginning of flowering. The mixture of tembotrione plus bentazon applied at the beginning of flowering exhibited 74% control at 21 DAT; however, the control was decreased to 41% at 35 DAT. When the mixture was applied at the early vegetative stage, S. elaeagnifolium control was 61% at 23 DAT, which was decreased to 27% at 39 DAT. Glufosinate and glyphosate were found to be reliable options for control of silverleaf nightshade when applied at either weed growth stage; tembotrione could be also another reliable option, however, when applied only at an early vegetative stage. The results have significant implications for developing appropriate management practices for silverleaf nightshade, taking into account chemical options for preventing the evolution of herbicide resistance.
id SBCPD-1_74e5908b232270330b8999829e569f45
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582017000100262
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)application stageherbicide efficacyinvasive weedABSTRACT Silverleaf nightshade is a difficult-to-control perennial weed. Field experiments were conducted in northern Greece to evaluate the control of silverleaf nightshade with POST applications of glufosinate (1,500 g a.i. ha-1), glyphosate (3,600 g a.i. ha-1), tembotrione (148.5 g a.i. ha-1), and a mixture of tembotrione plus bentazon (148.5 plus 1,440 g a.i. ha-1) at an early vegetative stage (plant height 10-15 cm) and at the beginning of flowering (plant height 30-50 cm). Glufosinate provided > 95% control of silverleaf nightshade from 7 to 39 days after treatment (DAT), regardless of the vegetative stage at herbicide application. Similarly, glyphosate provided up to 90% control around 39 DAT at either growth stage applied, exhibiting gradually increasing efficacy. Tembotrione alone controlled silverleaf nightshade 85% when applied at the early vegetative stage and 48% when applied at the beginning of flowering. The mixture of tembotrione plus bentazon applied at the beginning of flowering exhibited 74% control at 21 DAT; however, the control was decreased to 41% at 35 DAT. When the mixture was applied at the early vegetative stage, S. elaeagnifolium control was 61% at 23 DAT, which was decreased to 27% at 39 DAT. Glufosinate and glyphosate were found to be reliable options for control of silverleaf nightshade when applied at either weed growth stage; tembotrione could be also another reliable option, however, when applied only at an early vegetative stage. The results have significant implications for developing appropriate management practices for silverleaf nightshade, taking into account chemical options for preventing the evolution of herbicide resistance.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582017000100262Planta Daninha v.35 2017reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/s0100-83582017350100064info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGITSOPOULOS,T.K.DAMALAS,C.A.GEORGOULAS,I.eng2018-07-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582017000100262Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2018-07-24T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
title CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
spellingShingle CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
GITSOPOULOS,T.K.
application stage
herbicide efficacy
invasive weed
title_short CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
title_full CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
title_fullStr CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
title_full_unstemmed CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
title_sort CHEMICAL OPTIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF SILVERLEAF NIGHTSHADE (Solanum elaeagnifolium)
author GITSOPOULOS,T.K.
author_facet GITSOPOULOS,T.K.
DAMALAS,C.A.
GEORGOULAS,I.
author_role author
author2 DAMALAS,C.A.
GEORGOULAS,I.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv GITSOPOULOS,T.K.
DAMALAS,C.A.
GEORGOULAS,I.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv application stage
herbicide efficacy
invasive weed
topic application stage
herbicide efficacy
invasive weed
description ABSTRACT Silverleaf nightshade is a difficult-to-control perennial weed. Field experiments were conducted in northern Greece to evaluate the control of silverleaf nightshade with POST applications of glufosinate (1,500 g a.i. ha-1), glyphosate (3,600 g a.i. ha-1), tembotrione (148.5 g a.i. ha-1), and a mixture of tembotrione plus bentazon (148.5 plus 1,440 g a.i. ha-1) at an early vegetative stage (plant height 10-15 cm) and at the beginning of flowering (plant height 30-50 cm). Glufosinate provided > 95% control of silverleaf nightshade from 7 to 39 days after treatment (DAT), regardless of the vegetative stage at herbicide application. Similarly, glyphosate provided up to 90% control around 39 DAT at either growth stage applied, exhibiting gradually increasing efficacy. Tembotrione alone controlled silverleaf nightshade 85% when applied at the early vegetative stage and 48% when applied at the beginning of flowering. The mixture of tembotrione plus bentazon applied at the beginning of flowering exhibited 74% control at 21 DAT; however, the control was decreased to 41% at 35 DAT. When the mixture was applied at the early vegetative stage, S. elaeagnifolium control was 61% at 23 DAT, which was decreased to 27% at 39 DAT. Glufosinate and glyphosate were found to be reliable options for control of silverleaf nightshade when applied at either weed growth stage; tembotrione could be also another reliable option, however, when applied only at an early vegetative stage. The results have significant implications for developing appropriate management practices for silverleaf nightshade, taking into account chemical options for preventing the evolution of herbicide resistance.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582017000100262
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582017000100262
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0100-83582017350100064
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.35 2017
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126495599362048