Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: GALON,L
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: FORTE,C.T., GIACOMINI,J.P., REICHERT Jr,F.W., SCARIOT,M.A., DAVID,F.A., PERIN,G.F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000200239
Resumo: ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the competitive ability of summer crisp and butterhead lettuce types in coexistence with populations of ryegrass. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial 2 x 7 scheme, with four replications. On the A factor the lettuce types (summer crisp and butterhead) were allocated and, on B, the densities of ryegrass (0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 plants per pot). The number of leaves, chlorophyll content, leaf area, green mass and dry mass of the lettuce types and ryegrass were evaluated, and the diameter of the culture stem and the tiller number of the weed were determined. Differences in competitive ability between the lettuce types in competition with ryegrass were found, and butterhead was the most competitive when compared with summer crisp for all variables studied. There was an average loss of leaf area in lettuce types of up to 80% when it competed with ryegrass in the populations involved. Ryegrass is a very competitive weed to infect lettuce, and its handling is necessary, even at low densities to avoid productivity losses. The butterhead type of lettuce supports longer competition with ryegrass compared to summer crisp.
id SBCPD-1_7f6d808610a91c2af620488240383775
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582016000200239
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1interferenceLactuca sativaLolium multiflorumABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the competitive ability of summer crisp and butterhead lettuce types in coexistence with populations of ryegrass. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial 2 x 7 scheme, with four replications. On the A factor the lettuce types (summer crisp and butterhead) were allocated and, on B, the densities of ryegrass (0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 plants per pot). The number of leaves, chlorophyll content, leaf area, green mass and dry mass of the lettuce types and ryegrass were evaluated, and the diameter of the culture stem and the tiller number of the weed were determined. Differences in competitive ability between the lettuce types in competition with ryegrass were found, and butterhead was the most competitive when compared with summer crisp for all variables studied. There was an average loss of leaf area in lettuce types of up to 80% when it competed with ryegrass in the populations involved. Ryegrass is a very competitive weed to infect lettuce, and its handling is necessary, even at low densities to avoid productivity losses. The butterhead type of lettuce supports longer competition with ryegrass compared to summer crisp.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000200239Planta Daninha v.34 n.2 2016reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/S0100-83582016340200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGALON,LFORTE,C.T.GIACOMINI,J.P.REICHERT Jr,F.W.SCARIOT,M.A.DAVID,F.A.PERIN,G.F.eng2016-06-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582016000200239Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2016-06-15T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
title Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
spellingShingle Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
GALON,L
interference
Lactuca sativa
Lolium multiflorum
title_short Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
title_full Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
title_fullStr Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
title_full_unstemmed Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
title_sort Competitive Ability of Lettuce with Ryegrass1
author GALON,L
author_facet GALON,L
FORTE,C.T.
GIACOMINI,J.P.
REICHERT Jr,F.W.
SCARIOT,M.A.
DAVID,F.A.
PERIN,G.F.
author_role author
author2 FORTE,C.T.
GIACOMINI,J.P.
REICHERT Jr,F.W.
SCARIOT,M.A.
DAVID,F.A.
PERIN,G.F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv GALON,L
FORTE,C.T.
GIACOMINI,J.P.
REICHERT Jr,F.W.
SCARIOT,M.A.
DAVID,F.A.
PERIN,G.F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv interference
Lactuca sativa
Lolium multiflorum
topic interference
Lactuca sativa
Lolium multiflorum
description ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the competitive ability of summer crisp and butterhead lettuce types in coexistence with populations of ryegrass. The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial 2 x 7 scheme, with four replications. On the A factor the lettuce types (summer crisp and butterhead) were allocated and, on B, the densities of ryegrass (0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 plants per pot). The number of leaves, chlorophyll content, leaf area, green mass and dry mass of the lettuce types and ryegrass were evaluated, and the diameter of the culture stem and the tiller number of the weed were determined. Differences in competitive ability between the lettuce types in competition with ryegrass were found, and butterhead was the most competitive when compared with summer crisp for all variables studied. There was an average loss of leaf area in lettuce types of up to 80% when it competed with ryegrass in the populations involved. Ryegrass is a very competitive weed to infect lettuce, and its handling is necessary, even at low densities to avoid productivity losses. The butterhead type of lettuce supports longer competition with ryegrass compared to summer crisp.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000200239
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000200239
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-83582016340200005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.34 n.2 2016
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126494873747456