Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tavella,L.B.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Silva,P.S.L., Monteiro,A.L., Oliveira,V.R., Siqueira,P.L.O.F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200249
Resumo: One of the very important components in the organic maize production costs refers to spending on weed control. In this research were assessed the effects of maize hybrids (AG 1051 and BR 205) in an intercropping with Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) and mechanical hoeing on weed control. The treatments assessed were: A - maize monocropping + two hoeings (20 and 40 days after sowing); B - maize with one hoeing at 20 days + intercropping with gliricidia sowed after hoeing; C - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing + hoeing at 40 days; D - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing without hoeing; E - monocropping maize without hoeing. In the intercroppings, gliricidia was sowed in broadcast seeding with 30 viable seeds m-2. Maize hybrids did not differ in their effects on weed growth and grain yield. Treatments A, B and C have reduced weed growth, compared to treatments D and E. The highest grain yield was obtained with treatment A and the lowest with treatment E. It was concluded that intercropping maize and gliricidia is not a good alternative for an integrated weed management in maize crops in the conditions assessed.
id SBCPD-1_a7fb53387d7a2d70bb378ad2b916ed8d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582015000200249
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia IntercroppingZea maysGliricidia sepiummaize yieldOne of the very important components in the organic maize production costs refers to spending on weed control. In this research were assessed the effects of maize hybrids (AG 1051 and BR 205) in an intercropping with Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) and mechanical hoeing on weed control. The treatments assessed were: A - maize monocropping + two hoeings (20 and 40 days after sowing); B - maize with one hoeing at 20 days + intercropping with gliricidia sowed after hoeing; C - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing + hoeing at 40 days; D - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing without hoeing; E - monocropping maize without hoeing. In the intercroppings, gliricidia was sowed in broadcast seeding with 30 viable seeds m-2. Maize hybrids did not differ in their effects on weed growth and grain yield. Treatments A, B and C have reduced weed growth, compared to treatments D and E. The highest grain yield was obtained with treatment A and the lowest with treatment E. It was concluded that intercropping maize and gliricidia is not a good alternative for an integrated weed management in maize crops in the conditions assessed.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200249Planta Daninha v.33 n.2 2015reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/0100-83582015000200010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTavella,L.B.Silva,P.S.L.Monteiro,A.L.Oliveira,V.R.Siqueira,P.L.O.F.eng2015-07-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582015000200249Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2015-07-06T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
title Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
spellingShingle Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
Tavella,L.B.
Zea mays
Gliricidia sepium
maize yield
title_short Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
title_full Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
title_fullStr Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
title_full_unstemmed Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
title_sort Weed Control in Maize with Gliricidia Intercropping
author Tavella,L.B.
author_facet Tavella,L.B.
Silva,P.S.L.
Monteiro,A.L.
Oliveira,V.R.
Siqueira,P.L.O.F.
author_role author
author2 Silva,P.S.L.
Monteiro,A.L.
Oliveira,V.R.
Siqueira,P.L.O.F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tavella,L.B.
Silva,P.S.L.
Monteiro,A.L.
Oliveira,V.R.
Siqueira,P.L.O.F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays
Gliricidia sepium
maize yield
topic Zea mays
Gliricidia sepium
maize yield
description One of the very important components in the organic maize production costs refers to spending on weed control. In this research were assessed the effects of maize hybrids (AG 1051 and BR 205) in an intercropping with Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) and mechanical hoeing on weed control. The treatments assessed were: A - maize monocropping + two hoeings (20 and 40 days after sowing); B - maize with one hoeing at 20 days + intercropping with gliricidia sowed after hoeing; C - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing + hoeing at 40 days; D - maize sowing intercropped with gliricidia at the time of maize sowing without hoeing; E - monocropping maize without hoeing. In the intercroppings, gliricidia was sowed in broadcast seeding with 30 viable seeds m-2. Maize hybrids did not differ in their effects on weed growth and grain yield. Treatments A, B and C have reduced weed growth, compared to treatments D and E. The highest grain yield was obtained with treatment A and the lowest with treatment E. It was concluded that intercropping maize and gliricidia is not a good alternative for an integrated weed management in maize crops in the conditions assessed.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200249
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200249
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-83582015000200010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.33 n.2 2015
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126494726946816