Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: IKRAM,R.M.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: TANVEER,A., MAQBOOL,R., NADEEN,M.A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100221
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Brown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the two chickpea types grown in Pakistan and other countries. The critical period for weed removal in a rainfed chickpea system is an important consideration in devising weed management strategies. Field experiments were conducted in the winter season of 2011 and 2012 to determine the extent of yield loss with different periods of weed crop competition. Seven weed crop competition periods (0, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 160 days after sowing - DAS) were used to identify the critical period for weed removal in rainfed chickpea. Experimental plots were naturally infested with Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in both years. Individual, composite density and dry weights of E. dracunculoides and Astragalussp. increased significantly with an increase in the competition period. However, yield and yield-contributing traits of chickpea significantly decreased with an increase in the competition period. Chickpea seed yield loss was 11-53% in different weed crop competition periods. Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. removed 39.9 and 36.9 kg ha-1 of N, 9.61 and 7.27 kg ha-1 of P and 38.3 and 36.9 kg ha-1 of K, respectively. Season long weed competition (160 days after sowing) resulted in 19.5% seed protein content compared with 24.5% seed protein content in weed-free chickpea. A Logistic equation was fitted to yield data in response to increasing periods of weed crop competition. The critical timing of weed removal at 5 and 10% acceptable yield losses were 26 and 39 DAS, respectively. The observed critical period suggests that in rainfed chickpea, a carefully timed weed removal could prevent grain yield losses.
id SBCPD-1_c50bfc5c86485d01acb6b895d69da9cf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582018000100221
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpeacritical period for weed removalnutrient lossesgrain yieldABSTRACT: Brown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the two chickpea types grown in Pakistan and other countries. The critical period for weed removal in a rainfed chickpea system is an important consideration in devising weed management strategies. Field experiments were conducted in the winter season of 2011 and 2012 to determine the extent of yield loss with different periods of weed crop competition. Seven weed crop competition periods (0, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 160 days after sowing - DAS) were used to identify the critical period for weed removal in rainfed chickpea. Experimental plots were naturally infested with Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in both years. Individual, composite density and dry weights of E. dracunculoides and Astragalussp. increased significantly with an increase in the competition period. However, yield and yield-contributing traits of chickpea significantly decreased with an increase in the competition period. Chickpea seed yield loss was 11-53% in different weed crop competition periods. Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. removed 39.9 and 36.9 kg ha-1 of N, 9.61 and 7.27 kg ha-1 of P and 38.3 and 36.9 kg ha-1 of K, respectively. Season long weed competition (160 days after sowing) resulted in 19.5% seed protein content compared with 24.5% seed protein content in weed-free chickpea. A Logistic equation was fitted to yield data in response to increasing periods of weed crop competition. The critical timing of weed removal at 5 and 10% acceptable yield losses were 26 and 39 DAS, respectively. The observed critical period suggests that in rainfed chickpea, a carefully timed weed removal could prevent grain yield losses.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100221Planta Daninha v.36 2018reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/s0100-83582018360100021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIKRAM,R.M.TANVEER,A.MAQBOOL,R.NADEEN,M.A.eng2018-07-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582018000100221Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2018-07-24T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
title Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
spellingShingle Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
IKRAM,R.M.
critical period for weed removal
nutrient losses
grain yield
title_short Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
title_full Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
title_fullStr Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
title_sort Modeling the Competitive Effect of Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in Zero Input Rainfed Chickpea
author IKRAM,R.M.
author_facet IKRAM,R.M.
TANVEER,A.
MAQBOOL,R.
NADEEN,M.A.
author_role author
author2 TANVEER,A.
MAQBOOL,R.
NADEEN,M.A.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv IKRAM,R.M.
TANVEER,A.
MAQBOOL,R.
NADEEN,M.A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv critical period for weed removal
nutrient losses
grain yield
topic critical period for weed removal
nutrient losses
grain yield
description ABSTRACT: Brown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the two chickpea types grown in Pakistan and other countries. The critical period for weed removal in a rainfed chickpea system is an important consideration in devising weed management strategies. Field experiments were conducted in the winter season of 2011 and 2012 to determine the extent of yield loss with different periods of weed crop competition. Seven weed crop competition periods (0, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 160 days after sowing - DAS) were used to identify the critical period for weed removal in rainfed chickpea. Experimental plots were naturally infested with Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. in both years. Individual, composite density and dry weights of E. dracunculoides and Astragalussp. increased significantly with an increase in the competition period. However, yield and yield-contributing traits of chickpea significantly decreased with an increase in the competition period. Chickpea seed yield loss was 11-53% in different weed crop competition periods. Euphorbia dracunculoides and Astragalus sp. removed 39.9 and 36.9 kg ha-1 of N, 9.61 and 7.27 kg ha-1 of P and 38.3 and 36.9 kg ha-1 of K, respectively. Season long weed competition (160 days after sowing) resulted in 19.5% seed protein content compared with 24.5% seed protein content in weed-free chickpea. A Logistic equation was fitted to yield data in response to increasing periods of weed crop competition. The critical timing of weed removal at 5 and 10% acceptable yield losses were 26 and 39 DAS, respectively. The observed critical period suggests that in rainfed chickpea, a carefully timed weed removal could prevent grain yield losses.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100221
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100221
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0100-83582018360100021
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.36 2018
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126495689539584