Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soracco,Carlos Germán
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Lozano,Luis Alberto, Balbuena,Roberto, Ressia,Juan Manuel, Filgueira,Roberto Raúl
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832012000400009
Resumo: In view of the importance of the macroporosity for the water transport properties of soils, its quantitative assessment is a challenging task. Measurements of hydraulic conductivity (K) at different soil water tensions and the quantification of water-conducting macropores (θM) of a soil under different tillage systems could help understand the effects on the soil porous system and related hydraulic properties. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of Conventional Tillage (CT), Chisel Plow (CP) and No Tillage (NT) on θM and on K; and to quantify the contribution of macroporosity to total water flux in a loam soil. A tension disc infiltrometer was used at two soil water pressure heads (-5 cm, and 0) to infer θM and K, during fallow. Macroporosity was determined based on the flow contribution between 0 and -5 cm water potentials (K0, K5, respectively), according to the Hagen-Poiseuille equation. The K0 values were statistically higher for CT than for NT and CP. The K5 values did not differ statistically among treatments. The mean K values varied between 0.20 and 3.70 cm/h. For CT, θM was significantly greater than for CP and NT, following the same trend as K0. No differences in θM were detected between CP and NT. With CT, the formation of water-conducting macropores with persistence until post-harvest was possible, while under CP preparation, the water-conducting macropores were not persistent. These results support the idea that tillage affects the soil water movement mainly by the resulting water-conducting macropores. Future studies on tillage effects on water movement should focus on macroporosity.
id SBCS-1_852e1799064ed288f9e53b979aa3b84f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-06832012000400009
network_acronym_str SBCS-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systemsTension disc infiltrometerno tillagechisel plowconventional tillageeffective porosityIn view of the importance of the macroporosity for the water transport properties of soils, its quantitative assessment is a challenging task. Measurements of hydraulic conductivity (K) at different soil water tensions and the quantification of water-conducting macropores (θM) of a soil under different tillage systems could help understand the effects on the soil porous system and related hydraulic properties. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of Conventional Tillage (CT), Chisel Plow (CP) and No Tillage (NT) on θM and on K; and to quantify the contribution of macroporosity to total water flux in a loam soil. A tension disc infiltrometer was used at two soil water pressure heads (-5 cm, and 0) to infer θM and K, during fallow. Macroporosity was determined based on the flow contribution between 0 and -5 cm water potentials (K0, K5, respectively), according to the Hagen-Poiseuille equation. The K0 values were statistically higher for CT than for NT and CP. The K5 values did not differ statistically among treatments. The mean K values varied between 0.20 and 3.70 cm/h. For CT, θM was significantly greater than for CP and NT, following the same trend as K0. No differences in θM were detected between CP and NT. With CT, the formation of water-conducting macropores with persistence until post-harvest was possible, while under CP preparation, the water-conducting macropores were not persistent. These results support the idea that tillage affects the soil water movement mainly by the resulting water-conducting macropores. Future studies on tillage effects on water movement should focus on macroporosity.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo2012-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832012000400009Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.36 n.4 2012reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)instacron:SBCS10.1590/S0100-06832012000400009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoracco,Carlos GermánLozano,Luis AlbertoBalbuena,RobertoRessia,Juan ManuelFilgueira,Roberto Raúleng2012-10-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-06832012000400009Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-0683&lng=es&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcs@ufv.br1806-96570100-0683opendoar:2012-10-23T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
title Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
spellingShingle Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
Soracco,Carlos Germán
Tension disc infiltrometer
no tillage
chisel plow
conventional tillage
effective porosity
title_short Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
title_full Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
title_fullStr Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
title_sort Contribution of macroporosity to water flux of a soil under different tillage systems
author Soracco,Carlos Germán
author_facet Soracco,Carlos Germán
Lozano,Luis Alberto
Balbuena,Roberto
Ressia,Juan Manuel
Filgueira,Roberto Raúl
author_role author
author2 Lozano,Luis Alberto
Balbuena,Roberto
Ressia,Juan Manuel
Filgueira,Roberto Raúl
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soracco,Carlos Germán
Lozano,Luis Alberto
Balbuena,Roberto
Ressia,Juan Manuel
Filgueira,Roberto Raúl
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tension disc infiltrometer
no tillage
chisel plow
conventional tillage
effective porosity
topic Tension disc infiltrometer
no tillage
chisel plow
conventional tillage
effective porosity
description In view of the importance of the macroporosity for the water transport properties of soils, its quantitative assessment is a challenging task. Measurements of hydraulic conductivity (K) at different soil water tensions and the quantification of water-conducting macropores (θM) of a soil under different tillage systems could help understand the effects on the soil porous system and related hydraulic properties. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of Conventional Tillage (CT), Chisel Plow (CP) and No Tillage (NT) on θM and on K; and to quantify the contribution of macroporosity to total water flux in a loam soil. A tension disc infiltrometer was used at two soil water pressure heads (-5 cm, and 0) to infer θM and K, during fallow. Macroporosity was determined based on the flow contribution between 0 and -5 cm water potentials (K0, K5, respectively), according to the Hagen-Poiseuille equation. The K0 values were statistically higher for CT than for NT and CP. The K5 values did not differ statistically among treatments. The mean K values varied between 0.20 and 3.70 cm/h. For CT, θM was significantly greater than for CP and NT, following the same trend as K0. No differences in θM were detected between CP and NT. With CT, the formation of water-conducting macropores with persistence until post-harvest was possible, while under CP preparation, the water-conducting macropores were not persistent. These results support the idea that tillage affects the soil water movement mainly by the resulting water-conducting macropores. Future studies on tillage effects on water movement should focus on macroporosity.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832012000400009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832012000400009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-06832012000400009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.36 n.4 2012
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron:SBCS
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron_str SBCS
institution SBCS
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcs@ufv.br
_version_ 1752126518058811392