Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soracco,Carlos Germán
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lozano,Luis Alberto, Villarreal,Rafael, Melani,Esteban, Sarli,Guillermo Oliverio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100410
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Determination of soil physical quality (SPQ) is very important because it is related to many important soil processes. However, it is not clear which indicators should be considered in this evaluation, and information about temporal variation of SPQ under different soil tillage systems is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of no tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) on temporal variation of capacity SPQ indicators [bulk density (BD), macroporosity (Pmac), air capacity (AC), plant available water capacity (PAWC), relative field capacity (RFC), Dexter's (S), and structural stability index (SSI)], and dynamic SPQ indicators [field saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0), water-conducting macroporosity (εma), and mesoporosity (εme); and pore continuity indexes based on water flux of total porosity (CWTP), of macroporosity (CWmac), and of mesoporosity (Cwmes)]. Additionally, the effect of the soil management system on corn yield was evaluated. Measurements and determinations were made at four different moments/cropping stages in the corn growing season (BS: before seeding; V6: six leaf stage; R5: physiological maturity; and AH: after harvest). Capacity SPQ indicators were derived from the soil water retention curve determined using sand box and pressure chambers, and dynamic SPQ indicators were derived from field infiltration data measured using a tension disc infiltrometer. Most capacity SPQ indicators were affected by the moment/cropping stage in which samples were taken, but followed similar trends and had similar values under both treatments, particularly in the AH stage. Dynamic SPQ indicators varied differently during the growing season depending on the management system. Under NT, most dynamic indicators increase from BS to V6 and decrease again at AH, whereas under CT, they follow a different trend, decreasing from BS to V6, remaining constant until R5, and increasing at AH. Corn yield was lower under CT (NT: 10,939 kg ha−1; CT: 8,265 kg ha−1). These results emphasize the need to include dynamic SPQ indicators, and their temporal variation when evaluating cropping systems with the aim of modeling crop yields. The capacity SPQ indicators were not able to distinguish between treatments.
id SBCS-1_d4556c3b597c2bb40c975b56ab8d1563
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-06832018000100410
network_acronym_str SBCS-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systemshydraulic conductivitysoil water retention curvepore continuity indexABSTRACT: Determination of soil physical quality (SPQ) is very important because it is related to many important soil processes. However, it is not clear which indicators should be considered in this evaluation, and information about temporal variation of SPQ under different soil tillage systems is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of no tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) on temporal variation of capacity SPQ indicators [bulk density (BD), macroporosity (Pmac), air capacity (AC), plant available water capacity (PAWC), relative field capacity (RFC), Dexter's (S), and structural stability index (SSI)], and dynamic SPQ indicators [field saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0), water-conducting macroporosity (εma), and mesoporosity (εme); and pore continuity indexes based on water flux of total porosity (CWTP), of macroporosity (CWmac), and of mesoporosity (Cwmes)]. Additionally, the effect of the soil management system on corn yield was evaluated. Measurements and determinations were made at four different moments/cropping stages in the corn growing season (BS: before seeding; V6: six leaf stage; R5: physiological maturity; and AH: after harvest). Capacity SPQ indicators were derived from the soil water retention curve determined using sand box and pressure chambers, and dynamic SPQ indicators were derived from field infiltration data measured using a tension disc infiltrometer. Most capacity SPQ indicators were affected by the moment/cropping stage in which samples were taken, but followed similar trends and had similar values under both treatments, particularly in the AH stage. Dynamic SPQ indicators varied differently during the growing season depending on the management system. Under NT, most dynamic indicators increase from BS to V6 and decrease again at AH, whereas under CT, they follow a different trend, decreasing from BS to V6, remaining constant until R5, and increasing at AH. Corn yield was lower under CT (NT: 10,939 kg ha−1; CT: 8,265 kg ha−1). These results emphasize the need to include dynamic SPQ indicators, and their temporal variation when evaluating cropping systems with the aim of modeling crop yields. The capacity SPQ indicators were not able to distinguish between treatments.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100410Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.42 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)instacron:SBCS10.1590/18069657rbcs20170408info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoracco,Carlos GermánLozano,Luis AlbertoVillarreal,RafaelMelani,EstebanSarli,Guillermo Oliverioeng2018-04-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-06832018000100410Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-0683&lng=es&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcs@ufv.br1806-96570100-0683opendoar:2018-04-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
title Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
spellingShingle Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
Soracco,Carlos Germán
hydraulic conductivity
soil water retention curve
pore continuity index
title_short Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
title_full Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
title_fullStr Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
title_sort Temporal Variation of Soil Physical Quality under Conventional and No-Till Systems
author Soracco,Carlos Germán
author_facet Soracco,Carlos Germán
Lozano,Luis Alberto
Villarreal,Rafael
Melani,Esteban
Sarli,Guillermo Oliverio
author_role author
author2 Lozano,Luis Alberto
Villarreal,Rafael
Melani,Esteban
Sarli,Guillermo Oliverio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soracco,Carlos Germán
Lozano,Luis Alberto
Villarreal,Rafael
Melani,Esteban
Sarli,Guillermo Oliverio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv hydraulic conductivity
soil water retention curve
pore continuity index
topic hydraulic conductivity
soil water retention curve
pore continuity index
description ABSTRACT: Determination of soil physical quality (SPQ) is very important because it is related to many important soil processes. However, it is not clear which indicators should be considered in this evaluation, and information about temporal variation of SPQ under different soil tillage systems is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of no tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) on temporal variation of capacity SPQ indicators [bulk density (BD), macroporosity (Pmac), air capacity (AC), plant available water capacity (PAWC), relative field capacity (RFC), Dexter's (S), and structural stability index (SSI)], and dynamic SPQ indicators [field saturated hydraulic conductivity (K0), water-conducting macroporosity (εma), and mesoporosity (εme); and pore continuity indexes based on water flux of total porosity (CWTP), of macroporosity (CWmac), and of mesoporosity (Cwmes)]. Additionally, the effect of the soil management system on corn yield was evaluated. Measurements and determinations were made at four different moments/cropping stages in the corn growing season (BS: before seeding; V6: six leaf stage; R5: physiological maturity; and AH: after harvest). Capacity SPQ indicators were derived from the soil water retention curve determined using sand box and pressure chambers, and dynamic SPQ indicators were derived from field infiltration data measured using a tension disc infiltrometer. Most capacity SPQ indicators were affected by the moment/cropping stage in which samples were taken, but followed similar trends and had similar values under both treatments, particularly in the AH stage. Dynamic SPQ indicators varied differently during the growing season depending on the management system. Under NT, most dynamic indicators increase from BS to V6 and decrease again at AH, whereas under CT, they follow a different trend, decreasing from BS to V6, remaining constant until R5, and increasing at AH. Corn yield was lower under CT (NT: 10,939 kg ha−1; CT: 8,265 kg ha−1). These results emphasize the need to include dynamic SPQ indicators, and their temporal variation when evaluating cropping systems with the aim of modeling crop yields. The capacity SPQ indicators were not able to distinguish between treatments.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100410
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100410
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/18069657rbcs20170408
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.42 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron:SBCS
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron_str SBCS
institution SBCS
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcs@ufv.br
_version_ 1752126521782304768