Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that contributes substantially to global climate change. The N2O soil emissions have a large uncertainty because of its low atmospheric concentration levels and enormous spatial and temporal variability, which hinders its correct field measurement. For this reason, there are many papers focused on improving the N2O measurements in the field, which focus on different parts of the measurement process. However, no studies have focused on determining the appropriate method, in terms of simplicity and precision, for the sample extraction from inside of the chambers and its transfer to the storage vials, although this step is key in the sampling process. This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracies of three simple and economical methods in transfer soil emitted N2O from inside of the chambers to the vials. For this, a highly accepted method (vacuum by manual pump) and two simpler alternative methods (gas exchange by displacement and vacuum by syringe) were compared. Thirty static chambers were assessed with the quantified N2O emission values varied from 0 to 450 µg m-2 h-1 of N-N2O. Out of the three assessed methods, the vacuum method through the use of a manual vacuum pump was the best to quantifying N2O soil emissions (capturing 57 % of the highest emission values), followed by the gas exchange method by displacement (30 %), and finally by the vacuum method by syringe extraction (13%). |
id |
SBCS-1_da41819b830bd495bb29529aacd01f3d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-06832020000100407 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCS-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vialvacuum by manual pumpgas exchange by displacementvacuum by syringeABSTRACT Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that contributes substantially to global climate change. The N2O soil emissions have a large uncertainty because of its low atmospheric concentration levels and enormous spatial and temporal variability, which hinders its correct field measurement. For this reason, there are many papers focused on improving the N2O measurements in the field, which focus on different parts of the measurement process. However, no studies have focused on determining the appropriate method, in terms of simplicity and precision, for the sample extraction from inside of the chambers and its transfer to the storage vials, although this step is key in the sampling process. This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracies of three simple and economical methods in transfer soil emitted N2O from inside of the chambers to the vials. For this, a highly accepted method (vacuum by manual pump) and two simpler alternative methods (gas exchange by displacement and vacuum by syringe) were compared. Thirty static chambers were assessed with the quantified N2O emission values varied from 0 to 450 µg m-2 h-1 of N-N2O. Out of the three assessed methods, the vacuum method through the use of a manual vacuum pump was the best to quantifying N2O soil emissions (capturing 57 % of the highest emission values), followed by the gas exchange method by displacement (30 %), and finally by the vacuum method by syringe extraction (13%).Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.44 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)instacron:SBCS10.36783/18069657rbcs20190100info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosentino,Vanina Rosa NoemíRomaniuk,Romina IngridLupi,Ana MaríaGómez,Federico ManuelKorsakov,Helena RimskiÁlvarez,Carina RosaCiarlo,Estebaneng2020-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-06832020000100407Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-0683&lng=es&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcs@ufv.br1806-96570100-0683opendoar:2020-07-20T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial |
title |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí vacuum by manual pump gas exchange by displacement vacuum by syringe |
title_short |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial |
title_full |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial |
title_sort |
Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial |
author |
Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí |
author_facet |
Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí Romaniuk,Romina Ingrid Lupi,Ana María Gómez,Federico Manuel Korsakov,Helena Rimski Álvarez,Carina Rosa Ciarlo,Esteban |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Romaniuk,Romina Ingrid Lupi,Ana María Gómez,Federico Manuel Korsakov,Helena Rimski Álvarez,Carina Rosa Ciarlo,Esteban |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí Romaniuk,Romina Ingrid Lupi,Ana María Gómez,Federico Manuel Korsakov,Helena Rimski Álvarez,Carina Rosa Ciarlo,Esteban |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
vacuum by manual pump gas exchange by displacement vacuum by syringe |
topic |
vacuum by manual pump gas exchange by displacement vacuum by syringe |
description |
ABSTRACT Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that contributes substantially to global climate change. The N2O soil emissions have a large uncertainty because of its low atmospheric concentration levels and enormous spatial and temporal variability, which hinders its correct field measurement. For this reason, there are many papers focused on improving the N2O measurements in the field, which focus on different parts of the measurement process. However, no studies have focused on determining the appropriate method, in terms of simplicity and precision, for the sample extraction from inside of the chambers and its transfer to the storage vials, although this step is key in the sampling process. This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracies of three simple and economical methods in transfer soil emitted N2O from inside of the chambers to the vials. For this, a highly accepted method (vacuum by manual pump) and two simpler alternative methods (gas exchange by displacement and vacuum by syringe) were compared. Thirty static chambers were assessed with the quantified N2O emission values varied from 0 to 450 µg m-2 h-1 of N-N2O. Out of the three assessed methods, the vacuum method through the use of a manual vacuum pump was the best to quantifying N2O soil emissions (capturing 57 % of the highest emission values), followed by the gas exchange method by displacement (30 %), and finally by the vacuum method by syringe extraction (13%). |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.36783/18069657rbcs20190100 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.44 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS) instacron:SBCS |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS) |
instacron_str |
SBCS |
institution |
SBCS |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbcs@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1752126522303447040 |