Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Romaniuk,Romina Ingrid, Lupi,Ana María, Gómez,Federico Manuel, Korsakov,Helena Rimski, Álvarez,Carina Rosa, Ciarlo,Esteban
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407
Resumo: ABSTRACT Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that contributes substantially to global climate change. The N2O soil emissions have a large uncertainty because of its low atmospheric concentration levels and enormous spatial and temporal variability, which hinders its correct field measurement. For this reason, there are many papers focused on improving the N2O measurements in the field, which focus on different parts of the measurement process. However, no studies have focused on determining the appropriate method, in terms of simplicity and precision, for the sample extraction from inside of the chambers and its transfer to the storage vials, although this step is key in the sampling process. This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracies of three simple and economical methods in transfer soil emitted N2O from inside of the chambers to the vials. For this, a highly accepted method (vacuum by manual pump) and two simpler alternative methods (gas exchange by displacement and vacuum by syringe) were compared. Thirty static chambers were assessed with the quantified N2O emission values varied from 0 to 450 µg m-2 h-1 of N-N2O. Out of the three assessed methods, the vacuum method through the use of a manual vacuum pump was the best to quantifying N2O soil emissions (capturing 57 % of the highest emission values), followed by the gas exchange method by displacement (30 %), and finally by the vacuum method by syringe extraction (13%).
id SBCS-1_da41819b830bd495bb29529aacd01f3d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-06832020000100407
network_acronym_str SBCS-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vialvacuum by manual pumpgas exchange by displacementvacuum by syringeABSTRACT Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that contributes substantially to global climate change. The N2O soil emissions have a large uncertainty because of its low atmospheric concentration levels and enormous spatial and temporal variability, which hinders its correct field measurement. For this reason, there are many papers focused on improving the N2O measurements in the field, which focus on different parts of the measurement process. However, no studies have focused on determining the appropriate method, in terms of simplicity and precision, for the sample extraction from inside of the chambers and its transfer to the storage vials, although this step is key in the sampling process. This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracies of three simple and economical methods in transfer soil emitted N2O from inside of the chambers to the vials. For this, a highly accepted method (vacuum by manual pump) and two simpler alternative methods (gas exchange by displacement and vacuum by syringe) were compared. Thirty static chambers were assessed with the quantified N2O emission values varied from 0 to 450 µg m-2 h-1 of N-N2O. Out of the three assessed methods, the vacuum method through the use of a manual vacuum pump was the best to quantifying N2O soil emissions (capturing 57 % of the highest emission values), followed by the gas exchange method by displacement (30 %), and finally by the vacuum method by syringe extraction (13%).Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.44 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)instacron:SBCS10.36783/18069657rbcs20190100info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosentino,Vanina Rosa NoemíRomaniuk,Romina IngridLupi,Ana MaríaGómez,Federico ManuelKorsakov,Helena RimskiÁlvarez,Carina RosaCiarlo,Estebaneng2020-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-06832020000100407Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-0683&lng=es&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcs@ufv.br1806-96570100-0683opendoar:2020-07-20T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
title Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
spellingShingle Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí
vacuum by manual pump
gas exchange by displacement
vacuum by syringe
title_short Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
title_full Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
title_fullStr Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
title_sort Comparison of field measurement methods of nitrous oxide soil emissions: from the chamber to the vial
author Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí
author_facet Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí
Romaniuk,Romina Ingrid
Lupi,Ana María
Gómez,Federico Manuel
Korsakov,Helena Rimski
Álvarez,Carina Rosa
Ciarlo,Esteban
author_role author
author2 Romaniuk,Romina Ingrid
Lupi,Ana María
Gómez,Federico Manuel
Korsakov,Helena Rimski
Álvarez,Carina Rosa
Ciarlo,Esteban
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cosentino,Vanina Rosa Noemí
Romaniuk,Romina Ingrid
Lupi,Ana María
Gómez,Federico Manuel
Korsakov,Helena Rimski
Álvarez,Carina Rosa
Ciarlo,Esteban
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv vacuum by manual pump
gas exchange by displacement
vacuum by syringe
topic vacuum by manual pump
gas exchange by displacement
vacuum by syringe
description ABSTRACT Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that contributes substantially to global climate change. The N2O soil emissions have a large uncertainty because of its low atmospheric concentration levels and enormous spatial and temporal variability, which hinders its correct field measurement. For this reason, there are many papers focused on improving the N2O measurements in the field, which focus on different parts of the measurement process. However, no studies have focused on determining the appropriate method, in terms of simplicity and precision, for the sample extraction from inside of the chambers and its transfer to the storage vials, although this step is key in the sampling process. This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracies of three simple and economical methods in transfer soil emitted N2O from inside of the chambers to the vials. For this, a highly accepted method (vacuum by manual pump) and two simpler alternative methods (gas exchange by displacement and vacuum by syringe) were compared. Thirty static chambers were assessed with the quantified N2O emission values varied from 0 to 450 µg m-2 h-1 of N-N2O. Out of the three assessed methods, the vacuum method through the use of a manual vacuum pump was the best to quantifying N2O soil emissions (capturing 57 % of the highest emission values), followed by the gas exchange method by displacement (30 %), and finally by the vacuum method by syringe extraction (13%).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100407
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.36783/18069657rbcs20190100
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.44 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron:SBCS
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron_str SBCS
institution SBCS
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcs@ufv.br
_version_ 1752126522303447040