Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612022000100677 |
Resumo: | Abstract To investigate the safety and efficacy of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in treating advanced gastric cancer. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of gastric cancer surgery combined with intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the efficacy and safety were screened by computer search PubMed, Medline, Springer, Elsevier Science Direct, Weipu, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) with the last report up to October 2019. The control group underwent radical gastrectomy, and the experimental group underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and radical gastrectomy. A total of 997 (Experimental group 453; Control group 544) participants were considered in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the experimental group has higher 1-year survival rate [OR=2.40, 95%CI (1.34, 4.33), P=0.003], 2-year survival rate [OR=3.45, 95%CI (2.08, 5.75), P<0.00001], 3-year survival rate [OR=2.70, 95%CI (2.05, 3.54), P<0.00001] and 5-year survival rate [OR=2.90, 95%CI (1.93, 4.37), P<0.00001]. There is no significant difference in postoperative bleeding (P=0.95), postoperative infection (P=0.26), postoperative anastomotic leakage (P=0.41), and postoperative intestinal obstruction (P=0.11). Intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with advanced gastric cancer in the Chinese population can improve patients’ survival rate after surgery and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, so it is clinically significant and safe. |
id |
SBCTA-1_0d4a0b9d10c8660a47c7a5cc3f386c7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-20612022000100677 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysisadvanced gastric cancerintraperitoneal chemotherapymeta-analysisAbstract To investigate the safety and efficacy of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in treating advanced gastric cancer. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of gastric cancer surgery combined with intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the efficacy and safety were screened by computer search PubMed, Medline, Springer, Elsevier Science Direct, Weipu, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) with the last report up to October 2019. The control group underwent radical gastrectomy, and the experimental group underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and radical gastrectomy. A total of 997 (Experimental group 453; Control group 544) participants were considered in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the experimental group has higher 1-year survival rate [OR=2.40, 95%CI (1.34, 4.33), P=0.003], 2-year survival rate [OR=3.45, 95%CI (2.08, 5.75), P<0.00001], 3-year survival rate [OR=2.70, 95%CI (2.05, 3.54), P<0.00001] and 5-year survival rate [OR=2.90, 95%CI (1.93, 4.37), P<0.00001]. There is no significant difference in postoperative bleeding (P=0.95), postoperative infection (P=0.26), postoperative anastomotic leakage (P=0.41), and postoperative intestinal obstruction (P=0.11). Intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with advanced gastric cancer in the Chinese population can improve patients’ survival rate after surgery and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, so it is clinically significant and safe.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612022000100677Food Science and Technology v.42 2022reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/fst.34321info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTANG,JinYANG,JingHE,JinsongXIE,JiebinWANG,PanWEI,Shoujiangeng2022-02-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612022000100677Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2022-02-22T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis |
title |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis TANG,Jin advanced gastric cancer intraperitoneal chemotherapy meta-analysis |
title_short |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis |
title_full |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis |
author |
TANG,Jin |
author_facet |
TANG,Jin YANG,Jing HE,Jinsong XIE,Jiebin WANG,Pan WEI,Shoujiang |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
YANG,Jing HE,Jinsong XIE,Jiebin WANG,Pan WEI,Shoujiang |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
TANG,Jin YANG,Jing HE,Jinsong XIE,Jiebin WANG,Pan WEI,Shoujiang |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
advanced gastric cancer intraperitoneal chemotherapy meta-analysis |
topic |
advanced gastric cancer intraperitoneal chemotherapy meta-analysis |
description |
Abstract To investigate the safety and efficacy of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in treating advanced gastric cancer. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of gastric cancer surgery combined with intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the efficacy and safety were screened by computer search PubMed, Medline, Springer, Elsevier Science Direct, Weipu, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) with the last report up to October 2019. The control group underwent radical gastrectomy, and the experimental group underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and radical gastrectomy. A total of 997 (Experimental group 453; Control group 544) participants were considered in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the experimental group has higher 1-year survival rate [OR=2.40, 95%CI (1.34, 4.33), P=0.003], 2-year survival rate [OR=3.45, 95%CI (2.08, 5.75), P<0.00001], 3-year survival rate [OR=2.70, 95%CI (2.05, 3.54), P<0.00001] and 5-year survival rate [OR=2.90, 95%CI (1.93, 4.37), P<0.00001]. There is no significant difference in postoperative bleeding (P=0.95), postoperative infection (P=0.26), postoperative anastomotic leakage (P=0.41), and postoperative intestinal obstruction (P=0.11). Intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with advanced gastric cancer in the Chinese population can improve patients’ survival rate after surgery and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, so it is clinically significant and safe. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612022000100677 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612022000100677 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/fst.34321 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology v.42 2022 reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) instacron:SBCTA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
instacron_str |
SBCTA |
institution |
SBCTA |
reponame_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
collection |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@sbcta.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126332456665088 |