Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scussel,V. M.
Data de Publicação: 2003
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612003000400009
Resumo: Milk and egg matrixes were assayed for aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and B1 (AFB1) respectively, by AOAC official and modified methods with detection and quantification by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). The modified methods: Blanc followed by Romer, showed to be most appropriate for AFM1 analysis in milk. Both methods reduced emulsion formation, produced cleaner extracts, no streaking spots, precision and accuracy improved, especially when quantification was performed by HPTLC. The use of ternary mixture in the Blanc Method was advantageous as the solvent could extract AFM1 directly from the first stage (extraction), leaving other compounds in the binary mixture layer, avoiding emulsion formation, thus reducing toxin loss. The relative standard deviation (RSD%) values were low, 16 and 7% when TLC and HPTLC were used, with a mean recovery of 94 and 97%, respectively. As far as egg matrix and final extract are concerned, both methods evaluated for AFB1 need further studies. Although that matrix leads to emulsion with consequent loss of toxin, the Romer modified presented a reasonable clean extract (mean recovery of 92 and 96% for TLC and HPTLC, respectively). Most of the methods studied did not performed as expected mainly due to the matrixes high content of triglicerides (rich on saturated fatty acids), cholesterol, carotene and proteins. Although nowadays most methodology for AFM1 is based on HPLC, TLC determination (Blanc and Romer modified) for AFM1 and AFB1 is particularly recommended to those, inexperienced in food and feed mycotoxins analysis and especially who cannot afford to purchase sophisticated (HPLC,HPTLC) instrumentation.
id SBCTA-1_4827dd563150e3c170949f570fe88ac2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-20612003000400009
network_acronym_str SBCTA-1
network_name_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggsaflatoxinAFM1AFB1TLCHPTLCmilkeggMilk and egg matrixes were assayed for aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and B1 (AFB1) respectively, by AOAC official and modified methods with detection and quantification by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). The modified methods: Blanc followed by Romer, showed to be most appropriate for AFM1 analysis in milk. Both methods reduced emulsion formation, produced cleaner extracts, no streaking spots, precision and accuracy improved, especially when quantification was performed by HPTLC. The use of ternary mixture in the Blanc Method was advantageous as the solvent could extract AFM1 directly from the first stage (extraction), leaving other compounds in the binary mixture layer, avoiding emulsion formation, thus reducing toxin loss. The relative standard deviation (RSD%) values were low, 16 and 7% when TLC and HPTLC were used, with a mean recovery of 94 and 97%, respectively. As far as egg matrix and final extract are concerned, both methods evaluated for AFB1 need further studies. Although that matrix leads to emulsion with consequent loss of toxin, the Romer modified presented a reasonable clean extract (mean recovery of 92 and 96% for TLC and HPTLC, respectively). Most of the methods studied did not performed as expected mainly due to the matrixes high content of triglicerides (rich on saturated fatty acids), cholesterol, carotene and proteins. Although nowadays most methodology for AFM1 is based on HPLC, TLC determination (Blanc and Romer modified) for AFM1 and AFB1 is particularly recommended to those, inexperienced in food and feed mycotoxins analysis and especially who cannot afford to purchase sophisticated (HPLC,HPTLC) instrumentation.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2003-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612003000400009Food Science and Technology v.23 suppl.0 2003reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612003000400009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScussel,V. M.eng2004-07-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612003000400009Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2004-07-13T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
title Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
spellingShingle Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
Scussel,V. M.
aflatoxin
AFM1
AFB1
TLC
HPTLC
milk
egg
title_short Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
title_full Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
title_fullStr Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
title_sort Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs
author Scussel,V. M.
author_facet Scussel,V. M.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scussel,V. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aflatoxin
AFM1
AFB1
TLC
HPTLC
milk
egg
topic aflatoxin
AFM1
AFB1
TLC
HPTLC
milk
egg
description Milk and egg matrixes were assayed for aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and B1 (AFB1) respectively, by AOAC official and modified methods with detection and quantification by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). The modified methods: Blanc followed by Romer, showed to be most appropriate for AFM1 analysis in milk. Both methods reduced emulsion formation, produced cleaner extracts, no streaking spots, precision and accuracy improved, especially when quantification was performed by HPTLC. The use of ternary mixture in the Blanc Method was advantageous as the solvent could extract AFM1 directly from the first stage (extraction), leaving other compounds in the binary mixture layer, avoiding emulsion formation, thus reducing toxin loss. The relative standard deviation (RSD%) values were low, 16 and 7% when TLC and HPTLC were used, with a mean recovery of 94 and 97%, respectively. As far as egg matrix and final extract are concerned, both methods evaluated for AFB1 need further studies. Although that matrix leads to emulsion with consequent loss of toxin, the Romer modified presented a reasonable clean extract (mean recovery of 92 and 96% for TLC and HPTLC, respectively). Most of the methods studied did not performed as expected mainly due to the matrixes high content of triglicerides (rich on saturated fatty acids), cholesterol, carotene and proteins. Although nowadays most methodology for AFM1 is based on HPLC, TLC determination (Blanc and Romer modified) for AFM1 and AFB1 is particularly recommended to those, inexperienced in food and feed mycotoxins analysis and especially who cannot afford to purchase sophisticated (HPLC,HPTLC) instrumentation.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612003000400009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612003000400009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-20612003000400009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology v.23 suppl.0 2003
reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron:SBCTA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron_str SBCTA
institution SBCTA
reponame_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
collection Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@sbcta.org.br
_version_ 1752126311391821824