Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: HUERTA,Katira da Mota
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: ALVES,Jamila dos Santos, SILVA,Ariádni Franco Coelho da, KUBOTA,Ernesto Hashime, ROSA,Claudia Severo da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000500015
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical quality and sensory acceptance of gluten-free breads with different percentages of chia flour (Salvia Hispanica L .). The chia flour was used to substitute rice flour and soy flour in order to replace the gum required in this type of bread. Four formulations were developed; a standard made with gum, and three formulations with 2.5%, 5.0% and 7.5% of chia flour. Analyses of specific volume, cooking losses and the rise in dough of the breads were performed. Sensory analysis included tests for affective acceptability and purchase intent. The results showed that the bread with 2.5% chia flour had specific volume and cooking losses similar to the standard. In terms of the rise in dough, the standard showed the highest values, followed by the bread made with 5.0% chia flour. The substitution of soy and rice flour with 2.5% of chia flour produced bread with sensory characteristics similar to the standard in all of the analyzed attributes; it also received higher purchase intent. Using chia flour at a concentration of 2.5%, compared to rice flour and soy flour, proved that it was possible to replace gum in the bread formulation.
id SBCTA-1_6659c5556802518bc82d3a7109468856
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-20612016000500015
network_acronym_str SBCTA-1
network_name_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flourceliac diseasechiaHPMC gumAbstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical quality and sensory acceptance of gluten-free breads with different percentages of chia flour (Salvia Hispanica L .). The chia flour was used to substitute rice flour and soy flour in order to replace the gum required in this type of bread. Four formulations were developed; a standard made with gum, and three formulations with 2.5%, 5.0% and 7.5% of chia flour. Analyses of specific volume, cooking losses and the rise in dough of the breads were performed. Sensory analysis included tests for affective acceptability and purchase intent. The results showed that the bread with 2.5% chia flour had specific volume and cooking losses similar to the standard. In terms of the rise in dough, the standard showed the highest values, followed by the bread made with 5.0% chia flour. The substitution of soy and rice flour with 2.5% of chia flour produced bread with sensory characteristics similar to the standard in all of the analyzed attributes; it also received higher purchase intent. Using chia flour at a concentration of 2.5%, compared to rice flour and soy flour, proved that it was possible to replace gum in the bread formulation.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000500015Food Science and Technology v.36 suppl.1 2016reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/1678-457x.0032info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHUERTA,Katira da MotaALVES,Jamila dos SantosSILVA,Ariádni Franco Coelho daKUBOTA,Ernesto HashimeROSA,Claudia Severo daeng2018-10-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612016000500015Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2018-10-03T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
title Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
spellingShingle Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
HUERTA,Katira da Mota
celiac disease
chia
HPMC gum
title_short Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
title_full Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
title_fullStr Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
title_full_unstemmed Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
title_sort Sensory response and physical characteristics of gluten-free and gum-free bread with chia flour
author HUERTA,Katira da Mota
author_facet HUERTA,Katira da Mota
ALVES,Jamila dos Santos
SILVA,Ariádni Franco Coelho da
KUBOTA,Ernesto Hashime
ROSA,Claudia Severo da
author_role author
author2 ALVES,Jamila dos Santos
SILVA,Ariádni Franco Coelho da
KUBOTA,Ernesto Hashime
ROSA,Claudia Severo da
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv HUERTA,Katira da Mota
ALVES,Jamila dos Santos
SILVA,Ariádni Franco Coelho da
KUBOTA,Ernesto Hashime
ROSA,Claudia Severo da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv celiac disease
chia
HPMC gum
topic celiac disease
chia
HPMC gum
description Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical quality and sensory acceptance of gluten-free breads with different percentages of chia flour (Salvia Hispanica L .). The chia flour was used to substitute rice flour and soy flour in order to replace the gum required in this type of bread. Four formulations were developed; a standard made with gum, and three formulations with 2.5%, 5.0% and 7.5% of chia flour. Analyses of specific volume, cooking losses and the rise in dough of the breads were performed. Sensory analysis included tests for affective acceptability and purchase intent. The results showed that the bread with 2.5% chia flour had specific volume and cooking losses similar to the standard. In terms of the rise in dough, the standard showed the highest values, followed by the bread made with 5.0% chia flour. The substitution of soy and rice flour with 2.5% of chia flour produced bread with sensory characteristics similar to the standard in all of the analyzed attributes; it also received higher purchase intent. Using chia flour at a concentration of 2.5%, compared to rice flour and soy flour, proved that it was possible to replace gum in the bread formulation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000500015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000500015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-457x.0032
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology v.36 suppl.1 2016
reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron:SBCTA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron_str SBCTA
institution SBCTA
reponame_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
collection Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@sbcta.org.br
_version_ 1752126320703176704