Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000500016 |
Resumo: | Sixteen common bean cultivars were compared concerning the physicochemical characteristics of their raw seeds in the course of two consecutive harvests, as well as the effect of storage conditions on starch and dietary fiber content of cooked beans. Using cluster analysis it was possible to identify groups of cultivars with different nutritional features. Bean cultivars were categorized into four different groups according either to their macronutrient content (crude protein-PROT, total dietary fiber-TDF, insoluble dietary fiber-IDF, soluble dietary fiber-SDF, digestible starch-DS, and resistant starch-RS) or to their micronutrient levels (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ca, Mg, and P). Guateian 6662 and Rio Tibagi appeared to be the most suitable cultivars to prevent nutritional deficiencies, because they had high PROT, DS, Fe, and Zn content. The high total dietary fiber and RS content of Iraí, Minuano, and TPS Bonito cultivars, and specially the high soluble fiber content of Guateian 6662 and Rio Tibagi cultivars suggests that they could have a beneficial role in controlling blood lipid and glucose levels. Cooked beans had a decrease in DS and an increase in RS content after storage (4 °C or -20 °C), but these changes were more prominent in beans that had low RS content before cooking than in those of high RS content. TDF, IDF, and SDF did not change after storage. |
id |
SBCTA-1_99cd1ee413c6b23d790551fddb789a2a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-20612010000500016 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.dietary fiberdigestible starchresistant starchmineral contentSixteen common bean cultivars were compared concerning the physicochemical characteristics of their raw seeds in the course of two consecutive harvests, as well as the effect of storage conditions on starch and dietary fiber content of cooked beans. Using cluster analysis it was possible to identify groups of cultivars with different nutritional features. Bean cultivars were categorized into four different groups according either to their macronutrient content (crude protein-PROT, total dietary fiber-TDF, insoluble dietary fiber-IDF, soluble dietary fiber-SDF, digestible starch-DS, and resistant starch-RS) or to their micronutrient levels (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ca, Mg, and P). Guateian 6662 and Rio Tibagi appeared to be the most suitable cultivars to prevent nutritional deficiencies, because they had high PROT, DS, Fe, and Zn content. The high total dietary fiber and RS content of Iraí, Minuano, and TPS Bonito cultivars, and specially the high soluble fiber content of Guateian 6662 and Rio Tibagi cultivars suggests that they could have a beneficial role in controlling blood lipid and glucose levels. Cooked beans had a decrease in DS and an increase in RS content after storage (4 °C or -20 °C), but these changes were more prominent in beans that had low RS content before cooking than in those of high RS content. TDF, IDF, and SDF did not change after storage.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2010-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000500016Food Science and Technology v.30 suppl.1 2010reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612010000500016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessProlla,Ivo Roberto DornelesBarbosa,Roberta GarciaVeeck,Ana Paula LimaAugusti,Paula RossiniSilva,Leila Picolli daRibeiro,Nerinéia DalfolloEmanuelli,Tatianaeng2010-07-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612010000500016Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2010-07-05T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. |
title |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. |
spellingShingle |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. Prolla,Ivo Roberto Dorneles dietary fiber digestible starch resistant starch mineral content |
title_short |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. |
title_full |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. |
title_fullStr |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. |
title_sort |
Cultivar, harvest year, and storage conditions affecting nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. |
author |
Prolla,Ivo Roberto Dorneles |
author_facet |
Prolla,Ivo Roberto Dorneles Barbosa,Roberta Garcia Veeck,Ana Paula Lima Augusti,Paula Rossini Silva,Leila Picolli da Ribeiro,Nerinéia Dalfollo Emanuelli,Tatiana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbosa,Roberta Garcia Veeck,Ana Paula Lima Augusti,Paula Rossini Silva,Leila Picolli da Ribeiro,Nerinéia Dalfollo Emanuelli,Tatiana |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prolla,Ivo Roberto Dorneles Barbosa,Roberta Garcia Veeck,Ana Paula Lima Augusti,Paula Rossini Silva,Leila Picolli da Ribeiro,Nerinéia Dalfollo Emanuelli,Tatiana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dietary fiber digestible starch resistant starch mineral content |
topic |
dietary fiber digestible starch resistant starch mineral content |
description |
Sixteen common bean cultivars were compared concerning the physicochemical characteristics of their raw seeds in the course of two consecutive harvests, as well as the effect of storage conditions on starch and dietary fiber content of cooked beans. Using cluster analysis it was possible to identify groups of cultivars with different nutritional features. Bean cultivars were categorized into four different groups according either to their macronutrient content (crude protein-PROT, total dietary fiber-TDF, insoluble dietary fiber-IDF, soluble dietary fiber-SDF, digestible starch-DS, and resistant starch-RS) or to their micronutrient levels (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ca, Mg, and P). Guateian 6662 and Rio Tibagi appeared to be the most suitable cultivars to prevent nutritional deficiencies, because they had high PROT, DS, Fe, and Zn content. The high total dietary fiber and RS content of Iraí, Minuano, and TPS Bonito cultivars, and specially the high soluble fiber content of Guateian 6662 and Rio Tibagi cultivars suggests that they could have a beneficial role in controlling blood lipid and glucose levels. Cooked beans had a decrease in DS and an increase in RS content after storage (4 °C or -20 °C), but these changes were more prominent in beans that had low RS content before cooking than in those of high RS content. TDF, IDF, and SDF did not change after storage. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000500016 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000500016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0101-20612010000500016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology v.30 suppl.1 2010 reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) instacron:SBCTA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
instacron_str |
SBCTA |
institution |
SBCTA |
reponame_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
collection |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@sbcta.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126316006604800 |