Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery,
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962020000500594 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background: The treatment of basal cell carcinoma depends on its histological subtype. Therefore, a biopsy should be performed before definitive treatment. However, as the biopsy is only a sample of the tumor, it does not always shows every histological subtype present in the neoplasm. Few studies have compared the histological findings of biopsies with the findings of Mohs micrographic surgery. By evaluating the totality of the peripheral margins, in addition to sampling large tumor areas, this technique provides a more representative amount of tissue than preoperative biopsy. Objectives: a) Determine the agreement between the histological subtype of basal cell carcinoma from punch biopsy and the findings of Mohs surgery; b) To assess, among the discordant cases, the prevalence of non-aggressive tumors in the preoperative biopsy that were reclassified as aggressive by Mohs surgery. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 79 cases of basal cell carcinomas submitted to punch biopsy and subsequent Mohs surgery. Results: The agreement between the classification of the subtypes in the biopsy and in Mohs surgery was 40.5%. Punch biopsy was able to predict the most aggressive basal cell carcinoma growth pattern in 83% of cases. Study limitations: Retrospective nature, sample size, and biopsies performed by different professionals. Conclusions: The agreement between the histopathological subtypes of basal cell carcinoma as seen in preoperative biopsy and Mohs surgery was low. However, preoperative biopsy presented good accuracy (83%) in detecting aggressive histopathological subtypes. |
id |
SBD-1_5614c61c0f0714aa2a746abc48e6b7d0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0365-05962020000500594 |
network_acronym_str |
SBD-1 |
network_name_str |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery,BiopsyCarcinoma, basal cellMohs surgeryPathologyAbstract Background: The treatment of basal cell carcinoma depends on its histological subtype. Therefore, a biopsy should be performed before definitive treatment. However, as the biopsy is only a sample of the tumor, it does not always shows every histological subtype present in the neoplasm. Few studies have compared the histological findings of biopsies with the findings of Mohs micrographic surgery. By evaluating the totality of the peripheral margins, in addition to sampling large tumor areas, this technique provides a more representative amount of tissue than preoperative biopsy. Objectives: a) Determine the agreement between the histological subtype of basal cell carcinoma from punch biopsy and the findings of Mohs surgery; b) To assess, among the discordant cases, the prevalence of non-aggressive tumors in the preoperative biopsy that were reclassified as aggressive by Mohs surgery. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 79 cases of basal cell carcinomas submitted to punch biopsy and subsequent Mohs surgery. Results: The agreement between the classification of the subtypes in the biopsy and in Mohs surgery was 40.5%. Punch biopsy was able to predict the most aggressive basal cell carcinoma growth pattern in 83% of cases. Study limitations: Retrospective nature, sample size, and biopsies performed by different professionals. Conclusions: The agreement between the histopathological subtypes of basal cell carcinoma as seen in preoperative biopsy and Mohs surgery was low. However, preoperative biopsy presented good accuracy (83%) in detecting aggressive histopathological subtypes.Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia2020-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962020000500594Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.95 n.5 2020reponame:Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD)instacron:SBD10.1016/j.abd.2020.04.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCerci,Felipe BochniaKubo,Elisa MayumiWerner,Betinaeng2020-11-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0365-05962020000500594Revistahttp://www.anaisdedermatologia.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpabd@sbd.org.br||revista@sbd.org.br1806-48410365-0596opendoar:2020-11-12T00:00Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, |
title |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, Cerci,Felipe Bochnia Biopsy Carcinoma, basal cell Mohs surgery Pathology |
title_short |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, |
title_full |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, |
title_sort |
Comparison of basal cell carcinoma subtypes observed in preoperative biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery, |
author |
Cerci,Felipe Bochnia |
author_facet |
Cerci,Felipe Bochnia Kubo,Elisa Mayumi Werner,Betina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kubo,Elisa Mayumi Werner,Betina |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cerci,Felipe Bochnia Kubo,Elisa Mayumi Werner,Betina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biopsy Carcinoma, basal cell Mohs surgery Pathology |
topic |
Biopsy Carcinoma, basal cell Mohs surgery Pathology |
description |
Abstract Background: The treatment of basal cell carcinoma depends on its histological subtype. Therefore, a biopsy should be performed before definitive treatment. However, as the biopsy is only a sample of the tumor, it does not always shows every histological subtype present in the neoplasm. Few studies have compared the histological findings of biopsies with the findings of Mohs micrographic surgery. By evaluating the totality of the peripheral margins, in addition to sampling large tumor areas, this technique provides a more representative amount of tissue than preoperative biopsy. Objectives: a) Determine the agreement between the histological subtype of basal cell carcinoma from punch biopsy and the findings of Mohs surgery; b) To assess, among the discordant cases, the prevalence of non-aggressive tumors in the preoperative biopsy that were reclassified as aggressive by Mohs surgery. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 79 cases of basal cell carcinomas submitted to punch biopsy and subsequent Mohs surgery. Results: The agreement between the classification of the subtypes in the biopsy and in Mohs surgery was 40.5%. Punch biopsy was able to predict the most aggressive basal cell carcinoma growth pattern in 83% of cases. Study limitations: Retrospective nature, sample size, and biopsies performed by different professionals. Conclusions: The agreement between the histopathological subtypes of basal cell carcinoma as seen in preoperative biopsy and Mohs surgery was low. However, preoperative biopsy presented good accuracy (83%) in detecting aggressive histopathological subtypes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962020000500594 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962020000500594 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.abd.2020.04.005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.95 n.5 2020 reponame:Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) instacron:SBD |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) |
instacron_str |
SBD |
institution |
SBD |
reponame_str |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
collection |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
abd@sbd.org.br||revista@sbd.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126424163024896 |