Predictive factors of melanoma thickness
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962022000500601 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background: Melanoma thickness is a relevant prognostic marker that is crucial for staging and its calculation relies on the histopathological examination. There is a risk of thickness underestimation with an incisional biopsy if the latter is not performed on a tumor area where the thickness is maximal. This occurrence may have an impact on a therapeutic decision, particularly regarding the excision margins and the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Objective: To assess the association between melanoma thickness and dermoscopic, demographic, epidemiological and clinical variables, aiming to identify predictive factors of thickness >1 mm. Methods: This was an observational and cross-sectional study, carried out on patients diagnosed with melanoma, from a single center over a time span of four years. Anatomopathological (thickness), dermoscopic, demographic, epidemiological, and clinical variables were collected. The associations between the variables with melanoma thickness were assessed. Results: A total of 119 patients were included. The presence of atypical vessels on the dermoscopic examination was an independent predictive factor of thickness >1 mm. Conversely, an atypical reticular pattern predicted melanoma thickness <1 mm. The presence of ephelides and a previous history of sunburn were also associated with melanomas thinner than 1 mm in the univariate analysis. Study limitations: The lack of data related to some variables and the absence of an optimal correlation between the dermoscopic and the anatomopathological examination constituted study limitations. Conclusion: An atypical vascular pattern on dermoscopy is associated with thickness >1 mm, helping with the choice of the optimal site to perform an incisional biopsy when an excisional biopsy is not feasible. |
id |
SBD-1_971cd8d2e3516806db42abb3054620e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0365-05962022000500601 |
network_acronym_str |
SBD-1 |
network_name_str |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Predictive factors of melanoma thicknessDermoscopyMelanomaSentinel lymph node biopsyAbstract Background: Melanoma thickness is a relevant prognostic marker that is crucial for staging and its calculation relies on the histopathological examination. There is a risk of thickness underestimation with an incisional biopsy if the latter is not performed on a tumor area where the thickness is maximal. This occurrence may have an impact on a therapeutic decision, particularly regarding the excision margins and the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Objective: To assess the association between melanoma thickness and dermoscopic, demographic, epidemiological and clinical variables, aiming to identify predictive factors of thickness >1 mm. Methods: This was an observational and cross-sectional study, carried out on patients diagnosed with melanoma, from a single center over a time span of four years. Anatomopathological (thickness), dermoscopic, demographic, epidemiological, and clinical variables were collected. The associations between the variables with melanoma thickness were assessed. Results: A total of 119 patients were included. The presence of atypical vessels on the dermoscopic examination was an independent predictive factor of thickness >1 mm. Conversely, an atypical reticular pattern predicted melanoma thickness <1 mm. The presence of ephelides and a previous history of sunburn were also associated with melanomas thinner than 1 mm in the univariate analysis. Study limitations: The lack of data related to some variables and the absence of an optimal correlation between the dermoscopic and the anatomopathological examination constituted study limitations. Conclusion: An atypical vascular pattern on dermoscopy is associated with thickness >1 mm, helping with the choice of the optimal site to perform an incisional biopsy when an excisional biopsy is not feasible.Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962022000500601Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.97 n.5 2022reponame:Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD)instacron:SBD10.1016/j.abd.2021.12.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Ana Rita CarreiroVieira,Ricardo José David Costaeng2022-09-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0365-05962022000500601Revistahttp://www.anaisdedermatologia.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpabd@sbd.org.br||revista@sbd.org.br1806-48410365-0596opendoar:2022-09-27T00:00Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness |
title |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness |
spellingShingle |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness Silva,Ana Rita Carreiro Dermoscopy Melanoma Sentinel lymph node biopsy |
title_short |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness |
title_full |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness |
title_fullStr |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness |
title_sort |
Predictive factors of melanoma thickness |
author |
Silva,Ana Rita Carreiro |
author_facet |
Silva,Ana Rita Carreiro Vieira,Ricardo José David Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira,Ricardo José David Costa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Ana Rita Carreiro Vieira,Ricardo José David Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dermoscopy Melanoma Sentinel lymph node biopsy |
topic |
Dermoscopy Melanoma Sentinel lymph node biopsy |
description |
Abstract Background: Melanoma thickness is a relevant prognostic marker that is crucial for staging and its calculation relies on the histopathological examination. There is a risk of thickness underestimation with an incisional biopsy if the latter is not performed on a tumor area where the thickness is maximal. This occurrence may have an impact on a therapeutic decision, particularly regarding the excision margins and the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Objective: To assess the association between melanoma thickness and dermoscopic, demographic, epidemiological and clinical variables, aiming to identify predictive factors of thickness >1 mm. Methods: This was an observational and cross-sectional study, carried out on patients diagnosed with melanoma, from a single center over a time span of four years. Anatomopathological (thickness), dermoscopic, demographic, epidemiological, and clinical variables were collected. The associations between the variables with melanoma thickness were assessed. Results: A total of 119 patients were included. The presence of atypical vessels on the dermoscopic examination was an independent predictive factor of thickness >1 mm. Conversely, an atypical reticular pattern predicted melanoma thickness <1 mm. The presence of ephelides and a previous history of sunburn were also associated with melanomas thinner than 1 mm in the univariate analysis. Study limitations: The lack of data related to some variables and the absence of an optimal correlation between the dermoscopic and the anatomopathological examination constituted study limitations. Conclusion: An atypical vascular pattern on dermoscopy is associated with thickness >1 mm, helping with the choice of the optimal site to perform an incisional biopsy when an excisional biopsy is not feasible. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962022000500601 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962022000500601 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.abd.2021.12.002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.97 n.5 2022 reponame:Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) instacron:SBD |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) |
instacron_str |
SBD |
institution |
SBD |
reponame_str |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
collection |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
abd@sbd.org.br||revista@sbd.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126424952602624 |