Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502006001000017 |
Resumo: | PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of perioperative administration of diet containing probiotics on the immune response, anastomotic resistance, and colonic mucosal trophism in rats underwent left-sided colonic anastomosis. METHODS: Sixty adults Wistar rats were randomized to two groups (A and B) with 30 animals each to receive or not a diet supplemented with probiotics (Streptococcus thermophilus e Lactobacillus helveticus) during pre- and postoperative period. They underwent laparotomy followed by left colon section and immediate anastomosis. Groups of 15 animals were killed either on the 4th (groups A1 and B1) or 7th PO (groups A2 and B2) days. The outcome variables were serum proteins, albumin, globulins and IgA, lenght and weight of the colon, mucosal weight, DNA content and anastomotic bursting pressure. RESULTS: Colonic weight was greater in probiotic group compared to controls (1,69±0,34g vs 1,48±0,26g; p<0.05). Total serum proteins and globulin were higher in probiotic animals (proteins = 7,05±0,97g/dl vs 6,57±0,66g/dl e globulins = 5,1±0,62g/dl vs 4,68±1,1g/dl; p<0.05). Serum IgA increased from basal to post-operative days only in the probiotic group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative probiotics enhanced the immune response and colonic weight. Probiotics failed to increase anastomotic resistance. |
id |
SBDPC-1_1624953403eca90e890b7d28614da80e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-86502006001000017 |
network_acronym_str |
SBDPC-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophismProbioticsWound HealingImmunoglobulin AImmunity, mucosalAnastomosis, SurgicalColonIntestinal MucosaSurgeryPURPOSE: To investigate the effects of perioperative administration of diet containing probiotics on the immune response, anastomotic resistance, and colonic mucosal trophism in rats underwent left-sided colonic anastomosis. METHODS: Sixty adults Wistar rats were randomized to two groups (A and B) with 30 animals each to receive or not a diet supplemented with probiotics (Streptococcus thermophilus e Lactobacillus helveticus) during pre- and postoperative period. They underwent laparotomy followed by left colon section and immediate anastomosis. Groups of 15 animals were killed either on the 4th (groups A1 and B1) or 7th PO (groups A2 and B2) days. The outcome variables were serum proteins, albumin, globulins and IgA, lenght and weight of the colon, mucosal weight, DNA content and anastomotic bursting pressure. RESULTS: Colonic weight was greater in probiotic group compared to controls (1,69±0,34g vs 1,48±0,26g; p<0.05). Total serum proteins and globulin were higher in probiotic animals (proteins = 7,05±0,97g/dl vs 6,57±0,66g/dl e globulins = 5,1±0,62g/dl vs 4,68±1,1g/dl; p<0.05). Serum IgA increased from basal to post-operative days only in the probiotic group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative probiotics enhanced the immune response and colonic weight. Probiotics failed to increase anastomotic resistance.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502006001000017Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.21 suppl.4 2006reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86502006001000017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAguilar-Nascimento,José EduardoPrado,SávioZaffani,GeaziSalomão,Alberto BicudoNeves,José de SouzaDock-Nascimento,Diana BorgesMello,Paulo Roberto Bezerra deOkay,Thelma Suelyeng2007-02-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502006001000017Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2007-02-07T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism |
title |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism |
spellingShingle |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism Aguilar-Nascimento,José Eduardo Probiotics Wound Healing Immunoglobulin A Immunity, mucosal Anastomosis, Surgical Colon Intestinal Mucosa Surgery |
title_short |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism |
title_full |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism |
title_fullStr |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism |
title_sort |
Perioperative administration of probiotics: effects on immune response, anastomotic resistance and colonic mucosal trophism |
author |
Aguilar-Nascimento,José Eduardo |
author_facet |
Aguilar-Nascimento,José Eduardo Prado,Sávio Zaffani,Geazi Salomão,Alberto Bicudo Neves,José de Souza Dock-Nascimento,Diana Borges Mello,Paulo Roberto Bezerra de Okay,Thelma Suely |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Prado,Sávio Zaffani,Geazi Salomão,Alberto Bicudo Neves,José de Souza Dock-Nascimento,Diana Borges Mello,Paulo Roberto Bezerra de Okay,Thelma Suely |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aguilar-Nascimento,José Eduardo Prado,Sávio Zaffani,Geazi Salomão,Alberto Bicudo Neves,José de Souza Dock-Nascimento,Diana Borges Mello,Paulo Roberto Bezerra de Okay,Thelma Suely |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Probiotics Wound Healing Immunoglobulin A Immunity, mucosal Anastomosis, Surgical Colon Intestinal Mucosa Surgery |
topic |
Probiotics Wound Healing Immunoglobulin A Immunity, mucosal Anastomosis, Surgical Colon Intestinal Mucosa Surgery |
description |
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of perioperative administration of diet containing probiotics on the immune response, anastomotic resistance, and colonic mucosal trophism in rats underwent left-sided colonic anastomosis. METHODS: Sixty adults Wistar rats were randomized to two groups (A and B) with 30 animals each to receive or not a diet supplemented with probiotics (Streptococcus thermophilus e Lactobacillus helveticus) during pre- and postoperative period. They underwent laparotomy followed by left colon section and immediate anastomosis. Groups of 15 animals were killed either on the 4th (groups A1 and B1) or 7th PO (groups A2 and B2) days. The outcome variables were serum proteins, albumin, globulins and IgA, lenght and weight of the colon, mucosal weight, DNA content and anastomotic bursting pressure. RESULTS: Colonic weight was greater in probiotic group compared to controls (1,69±0,34g vs 1,48±0,26g; p<0.05). Total serum proteins and globulin were higher in probiotic animals (proteins = 7,05±0,97g/dl vs 6,57±0,66g/dl e globulins = 5,1±0,62g/dl vs 4,68±1,1g/dl; p<0.05). Serum IgA increased from basal to post-operative days only in the probiotic group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative probiotics enhanced the immune response and colonic weight. Probiotics failed to increase anastomotic resistance. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502006001000017 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502006001000017 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0102-86502006001000017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.21 suppl.4 2006 reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) instacron:SBDPC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
instacron_str |
SBDPC |
institution |
SBDPC |
reponame_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sgolden@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126438584090624 |