Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa,Luiz Henrique de
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Ceneviva,Reginaldo, Coutinho Netto,Joaquim, Mrué,Fátima, Sousa Filho,Luiz Henrique de, Silva,Orlando de Castro e
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502011000800016
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate the morphological aspects of the behavior of 4 types of latex biomembranes implanted in preperitoneal videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty. METHODS: Sixteen inguinoplasties were performed in 12 dogs: group 1 received an impermeable latex biomembrane in the right inguinal region and a prolene prosthesis, as control, in the contralateral inguinal region; groups 2, 3 and 4 received latex biomembranes respectively containing impermeable polyamide, 1-mm thick porous polyamide and 0.5-mm thick porous polyamide. Macro- and microscopic evaluations of the inguinal region and of the removed implants were made on the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th days in group 1 and on the 28th postoperative day in the other groups. RESULTS: We observed absence of hematoma, seroma and infection; presence of tortuosities; induction of vascular neoformation, inflammatory reaction and collagen deposition, and full encystment of the latex biomembranes, except that with fine porous polyamide, which was partially incorporated, with the formation of microcysts. No latex biomembrane induced fibrosis as observed in the prolene control group. CONCLUSIONS: The biomembranes maintain induction of the healing process without fibrosis, are fully encysted and, except for the one with fine porous polyamide, are not incorporated into adjacent tissues. The latex biomembrane, with or without polyamide, is not recommended as a separate material for preperitoneal inguinoplasty.
id SBDPC-1_4ad40710c00b391b89806b1e884c5b02
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-86502011000800016
network_acronym_str SBDPC-1
network_name_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogsHerniaLatexSurgical ProcedureSurgical LaparoscopyDogsPURPOSE: To evaluate the morphological aspects of the behavior of 4 types of latex biomembranes implanted in preperitoneal videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty. METHODS: Sixteen inguinoplasties were performed in 12 dogs: group 1 received an impermeable latex biomembrane in the right inguinal region and a prolene prosthesis, as control, in the contralateral inguinal region; groups 2, 3 and 4 received latex biomembranes respectively containing impermeable polyamide, 1-mm thick porous polyamide and 0.5-mm thick porous polyamide. Macro- and microscopic evaluations of the inguinal region and of the removed implants were made on the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th days in group 1 and on the 28th postoperative day in the other groups. RESULTS: We observed absence of hematoma, seroma and infection; presence of tortuosities; induction of vascular neoformation, inflammatory reaction and collagen deposition, and full encystment of the latex biomembranes, except that with fine porous polyamide, which was partially incorporated, with the formation of microcysts. No latex biomembrane induced fibrosis as observed in the prolene control group. CONCLUSIONS: The biomembranes maintain induction of the healing process without fibrosis, are fully encysted and, except for the one with fine porous polyamide, are not incorporated into adjacent tissues. The latex biomembrane, with or without polyamide, is not recommended as a separate material for preperitoneal inguinoplasty.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502011000800016Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.26 suppl.2 2011reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86502011000800016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa,Luiz Henrique deCeneviva,ReginaldoCoutinho Netto,JoaquimMrué,FátimaSousa Filho,Luiz Henrique deSilva,Orlando de Castro eeng2011-10-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502011000800016Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2011-10-24T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
title Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
spellingShingle Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
Sousa,Luiz Henrique de
Hernia
Latex
Surgical Procedure
Surgical Laparoscopy
Dogs
title_short Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
title_full Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
title_fullStr Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
title_sort Morphologic evaluation of the use of a latex prosthesis in videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty: an experimental study in dogs
author Sousa,Luiz Henrique de
author_facet Sousa,Luiz Henrique de
Ceneviva,Reginaldo
Coutinho Netto,Joaquim
Mrué,Fátima
Sousa Filho,Luiz Henrique de
Silva,Orlando de Castro e
author_role author
author2 Ceneviva,Reginaldo
Coutinho Netto,Joaquim
Mrué,Fátima
Sousa Filho,Luiz Henrique de
Silva,Orlando de Castro e
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa,Luiz Henrique de
Ceneviva,Reginaldo
Coutinho Netto,Joaquim
Mrué,Fátima
Sousa Filho,Luiz Henrique de
Silva,Orlando de Castro e
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hernia
Latex
Surgical Procedure
Surgical Laparoscopy
Dogs
topic Hernia
Latex
Surgical Procedure
Surgical Laparoscopy
Dogs
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the morphological aspects of the behavior of 4 types of latex biomembranes implanted in preperitoneal videolaparoscopic inguinoplasty. METHODS: Sixteen inguinoplasties were performed in 12 dogs: group 1 received an impermeable latex biomembrane in the right inguinal region and a prolene prosthesis, as control, in the contralateral inguinal region; groups 2, 3 and 4 received latex biomembranes respectively containing impermeable polyamide, 1-mm thick porous polyamide and 0.5-mm thick porous polyamide. Macro- and microscopic evaluations of the inguinal region and of the removed implants were made on the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th days in group 1 and on the 28th postoperative day in the other groups. RESULTS: We observed absence of hematoma, seroma and infection; presence of tortuosities; induction of vascular neoformation, inflammatory reaction and collagen deposition, and full encystment of the latex biomembranes, except that with fine porous polyamide, which was partially incorporated, with the formation of microcysts. No latex biomembrane induced fibrosis as observed in the prolene control group. CONCLUSIONS: The biomembranes maintain induction of the healing process without fibrosis, are fully encysted and, except for the one with fine porous polyamide, are not incorporated into adjacent tissues. The latex biomembrane, with or without polyamide, is not recommended as a separate material for preperitoneal inguinoplasty.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502011000800016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502011000800016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-86502011000800016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.26 suppl.2 2011
reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron:SBDPC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron_str SBDPC
institution SBDPC
reponame_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sgolden@terra.com.br
_version_ 1752126440837480448