Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502019000600202 |
Resumo: | Abstract Purpose To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. Methods After the defect in the abdominal wall, thirty Wistar rats were placed in three groups (ten animals each) for intraperitoneal mesh implant: polypropylene group, polypropylene/polyglecaprone group, and polyester/porcine collagen group. The macroscopic evaluation of the extent and intensity of adhesions was performed 21 days after the implant. Results The polypropylene group had a higher statistically significant impairment due to visceral adhesions (p value = 0.002) and a higher degree of intense adherence in relation to polypropylene/polyglecaprone and polyester/porcine collagen groups (p value<0.001). The polyester/porcine collagen group showed more intense adhesions than the polypropylene/polyglecaprone group (p value=0.035). Conclusions The intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene meshes to correct defects of the abdominal wall caused the appearance of extensive and firm adhesions to intra-abdominal structures. The use of polypropylene/polyglecaprone or polyester/porcine collagen tissue-separating meshes reduces the number and degree of adhesions formed. |
id |
SBDPC-1_607967b9e62bead7c88da2f953f63bc3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-86502019000600202 |
network_acronym_str |
SBDPC-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagenHernia, VentralSurgical MeshTissue AdhesionsRatsAbstract Purpose To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. Methods After the defect in the abdominal wall, thirty Wistar rats were placed in three groups (ten animals each) for intraperitoneal mesh implant: polypropylene group, polypropylene/polyglecaprone group, and polyester/porcine collagen group. The macroscopic evaluation of the extent and intensity of adhesions was performed 21 days after the implant. Results The polypropylene group had a higher statistically significant impairment due to visceral adhesions (p value = 0.002) and a higher degree of intense adherence in relation to polypropylene/polyglecaprone and polyester/porcine collagen groups (p value<0.001). The polyester/porcine collagen group showed more intense adhesions than the polypropylene/polyglecaprone group (p value=0.035). Conclusions The intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene meshes to correct defects of the abdominal wall caused the appearance of extensive and firm adhesions to intra-abdominal structures. The use of polypropylene/polyglecaprone or polyester/porcine collagen tissue-separating meshes reduces the number and degree of adhesions formed.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502019000600202Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.34 n.6 2019reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/s0102-865020190060000003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro,Waston GonçalvesRodrigues,Diego Vinnicyus SantosAtta,Francisco Felipe MoreiraRamos,Izabelle Smith FrazãoFrazão,Fabiola Nassar SousaTorres,Orlando Jorge MartinsPitombo,Marcos Bettinieng2019-08-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502019000600202Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2019-08-16T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
title |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen Ribeiro,Waston Gonçalves Hernia, Ventral Surgical Mesh Tissue Adhesions Rats |
title_short |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
title_full |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
title_sort |
Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen |
author |
Ribeiro,Waston Gonçalves |
author_facet |
Ribeiro,Waston Gonçalves Rodrigues,Diego Vinnicyus Santos Atta,Francisco Felipe Moreira Ramos,Izabelle Smith Frazão Frazão,Fabiola Nassar Sousa Torres,Orlando Jorge Martins Pitombo,Marcos Bettini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues,Diego Vinnicyus Santos Atta,Francisco Felipe Moreira Ramos,Izabelle Smith Frazão Frazão,Fabiola Nassar Sousa Torres,Orlando Jorge Martins Pitombo,Marcos Bettini |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro,Waston Gonçalves Rodrigues,Diego Vinnicyus Santos Atta,Francisco Felipe Moreira Ramos,Izabelle Smith Frazão Frazão,Fabiola Nassar Sousa Torres,Orlando Jorge Martins Pitombo,Marcos Bettini |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hernia, Ventral Surgical Mesh Tissue Adhesions Rats |
topic |
Hernia, Ventral Surgical Mesh Tissue Adhesions Rats |
description |
Abstract Purpose To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. Methods After the defect in the abdominal wall, thirty Wistar rats were placed in three groups (ten animals each) for intraperitoneal mesh implant: polypropylene group, polypropylene/polyglecaprone group, and polyester/porcine collagen group. The macroscopic evaluation of the extent and intensity of adhesions was performed 21 days after the implant. Results The polypropylene group had a higher statistically significant impairment due to visceral adhesions (p value = 0.002) and a higher degree of intense adherence in relation to polypropylene/polyglecaprone and polyester/porcine collagen groups (p value<0.001). The polyester/porcine collagen group showed more intense adhesions than the polypropylene/polyglecaprone group (p value=0.035). Conclusions The intraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene meshes to correct defects of the abdominal wall caused the appearance of extensive and firm adhesions to intra-abdominal structures. The use of polypropylene/polyglecaprone or polyester/porcine collagen tissue-separating meshes reduces the number and degree of adhesions formed. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502019000600202 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502019000600202 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-865020190060000003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.34 n.6 2019 reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) instacron:SBDPC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
instacron_str |
SBDPC |
institution |
SBDPC |
reponame_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sgolden@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126445383057408 |