Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da
Data de Publicação: 1997
Outros Autores: Silva,Alcino Lázaro da, Fenelon,Sheila Bernardino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002
Resumo: The aim of the present paper is to compare and correlate the take of nerve segments in a severely crushed nerve. Forty adult Wistar rats had their right sciatic nerve by a "Péan-Murphy" forceps for 40 minutes. In Group 1 (n=20), a segmentar serection in the crushed sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment from the opposite hindpaw was placed in the gap. In Group 2 (n=20), a lontudinal insision in the epineurium of the lesioned sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment was buried underneath the epineurium. The crushed sciatic nerves undergone Wallerian degeneration and endoneurial fibrosis. Sciatic nerves from Group 2 had significant better histological aspects than those from Group 1. Sural nerve grafts presented better degrees of regeneration than crushed sciatic nerves. Sural nerve grafts from Group 2 (burying method) integrated as well as those from Group 1 (segmentar resection).
id SBDPC-1_99328a00be8b64e6660aa98e22043a86
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-86501997000400002
network_acronym_str SBDPC-1
network_name_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nervesNerve crushNerve regenerationNerve degenerationSural nerveRatsThe aim of the present paper is to compare and correlate the take of nerve segments in a severely crushed nerve. Forty adult Wistar rats had their right sciatic nerve by a "Péan-Murphy" forceps for 40 minutes. In Group 1 (n=20), a segmentar serection in the crushed sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment from the opposite hindpaw was placed in the gap. In Group 2 (n=20), a lontudinal insision in the epineurium of the lesioned sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment was buried underneath the epineurium. The crushed sciatic nerves undergone Wallerian degeneration and endoneurial fibrosis. Sciatic nerves from Group 2 had significant better histological aspects than those from Group 1. Sural nerve grafts presented better degrees of regeneration than crushed sciatic nerves. Sural nerve grafts from Group 2 (burying method) integrated as well as those from Group 1 (segmentar resection).Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia1997-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.12 n.4 1997reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86501997000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues daSilva,Alcino Lázaro daFenelon,Sheila Bernardinoeng2001-06-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86501997000400002Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2001-06-04T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
title Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
spellingShingle Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da
Nerve crush
Nerve regeneration
Nerve degeneration
Sural nerve
Rats
title_short Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
title_full Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
title_fullStr Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
title_sort Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
author Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da
author_facet Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da
Silva,Alcino Lázaro da
Fenelon,Sheila Bernardino
author_role author
author2 Silva,Alcino Lázaro da
Fenelon,Sheila Bernardino
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da
Silva,Alcino Lázaro da
Fenelon,Sheila Bernardino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nerve crush
Nerve regeneration
Nerve degeneration
Sural nerve
Rats
topic Nerve crush
Nerve regeneration
Nerve degeneration
Sural nerve
Rats
description The aim of the present paper is to compare and correlate the take of nerve segments in a severely crushed nerve. Forty adult Wistar rats had their right sciatic nerve by a "Péan-Murphy" forceps for 40 minutes. In Group 1 (n=20), a segmentar serection in the crushed sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment from the opposite hindpaw was placed in the gap. In Group 2 (n=20), a lontudinal insision in the epineurium of the lesioned sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment was buried underneath the epineurium. The crushed sciatic nerves undergone Wallerian degeneration and endoneurial fibrosis. Sciatic nerves from Group 2 had significant better histological aspects than those from Group 1. Sural nerve grafts presented better degrees of regeneration than crushed sciatic nerves. Sural nerve grafts from Group 2 (burying method) integrated as well as those from Group 1 (segmentar resection).
publishDate 1997
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1997-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-86501997000400002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.12 n.4 1997
reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron:SBDPC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron_str SBDPC
institution SBDPC
reponame_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sgolden@terra.com.br
_version_ 1752126435040952320