Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1997 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002 |
Resumo: | The aim of the present paper is to compare and correlate the take of nerve segments in a severely crushed nerve. Forty adult Wistar rats had their right sciatic nerve by a "Péan-Murphy" forceps for 40 minutes. In Group 1 (n=20), a segmentar serection in the crushed sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment from the opposite hindpaw was placed in the gap. In Group 2 (n=20), a lontudinal insision in the epineurium of the lesioned sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment was buried underneath the epineurium. The crushed sciatic nerves undergone Wallerian degeneration and endoneurial fibrosis. Sciatic nerves from Group 2 had significant better histological aspects than those from Group 1. Sural nerve grafts presented better degrees of regeneration than crushed sciatic nerves. Sural nerve grafts from Group 2 (burying method) integrated as well as those from Group 1 (segmentar resection). |
id |
SBDPC-1_99328a00be8b64e6660aa98e22043a86 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-86501997000400002 |
network_acronym_str |
SBDPC-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nervesNerve crushNerve regenerationNerve degenerationSural nerveRatsThe aim of the present paper is to compare and correlate the take of nerve segments in a severely crushed nerve. Forty adult Wistar rats had their right sciatic nerve by a "Péan-Murphy" forceps for 40 minutes. In Group 1 (n=20), a segmentar serection in the crushed sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment from the opposite hindpaw was placed in the gap. In Group 2 (n=20), a lontudinal insision in the epineurium of the lesioned sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment was buried underneath the epineurium. The crushed sciatic nerves undergone Wallerian degeneration and endoneurial fibrosis. Sciatic nerves from Group 2 had significant better histological aspects than those from Group 1. Sural nerve grafts presented better degrees of regeneration than crushed sciatic nerves. Sural nerve grafts from Group 2 (burying method) integrated as well as those from Group 1 (segmentar resection).Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia1997-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.12 n.4 1997reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86501997000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues daSilva,Alcino Lázaro daFenelon,Sheila Bernardinoeng2001-06-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86501997000400002Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2001-06-04T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves |
title |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da Nerve crush Nerve regeneration Nerve degeneration Sural nerve Rats |
title_short |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves |
title_full |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves |
title_sort |
Comparison of nerve graft integration after segmentar resection versus epineural burying in crushed rat sciatic nerves |
author |
Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da |
author_facet |
Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da Silva,Alcino Lázaro da Fenelon,Sheila Bernardino |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Alcino Lázaro da Fenelon,Sheila Bernardino |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha,Marco Túlio Rodrigues da Silva,Alcino Lázaro da Fenelon,Sheila Bernardino |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nerve crush Nerve regeneration Nerve degeneration Sural nerve Rats |
topic |
Nerve crush Nerve regeneration Nerve degeneration Sural nerve Rats |
description |
The aim of the present paper is to compare and correlate the take of nerve segments in a severely crushed nerve. Forty adult Wistar rats had their right sciatic nerve by a "Péan-Murphy" forceps for 40 minutes. In Group 1 (n=20), a segmentar serection in the crushed sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment from the opposite hindpaw was placed in the gap. In Group 2 (n=20), a lontudinal insision in the epineurium of the lesioned sciatic nerve was made. A sural nerve segment was buried underneath the epineurium. The crushed sciatic nerves undergone Wallerian degeneration and endoneurial fibrosis. Sciatic nerves from Group 2 had significant better histological aspects than those from Group 1. Sural nerve grafts presented better degrees of regeneration than crushed sciatic nerves. Sural nerve grafts from Group 2 (burying method) integrated as well as those from Group 1 (segmentar resection). |
publishDate |
1997 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1997-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86501997000400002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0102-86501997000400002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.12 n.4 1997 reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) instacron:SBDPC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
instacron_str |
SBDPC |
institution |
SBDPC |
reponame_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sgolden@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126435040952320 |