Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nacif,Lucas Souto
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Amanda Olivotti, Maria,Durvanei Augusto, Kubrusly,Márcia Saldanha, Molan,Nilza, Chaib,Eleazar, D'Albuquerque,Luiz Carneiro, Andraus,Wellington
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502015000200100
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size syndrome. METHODS: A total of 40 rats underwent partial hepatectomy (70%) that induces the small-for-size syndrome and were divided into four groups of route administration: intravenous, intraperitoneal, enteral and tracheal. The small-for-size syndrome model was designed with extended partial hepatectomy (70%). The animals were divided into four groups of routes administration: intravenous (n=10) - intravenously through the dorsal vein of the penis; intraperitoneal (n=10) - intraperitoneally in the abdominal cavity; enteral (n=10) - oroenteral with the placement of a number 4 urethral probe and maintained at third duodenal portion; tracheal (n=10) - after tracheal intubation. We track the animals and monitor them for 21 days; during this follow-up we evaluated the result of cell therapy application tracking animals using ultrasound, radiography and PET-scan. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software(r). Differences were considered significant with the p<0.05. Data are presented as the median and variation for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were made using analysis of the imaging test by the researchers. RESULTS: All four groups underwent partial hepatectomy of 70% liver tissue targeting the same weight of resected liver. Initially the PET-scan tests showed similarity in administered cells by different routes. However, in few days the route of intravenous administration showed to be the most appropriated to lead cells to the liver followed by enteral. The tracheal and peritoneal routes were not as much successful for this goal. CONCLUSION: The intravenous route is the best one to cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size-syndrome.
id SBDPC-1_a457970d185c84e15d7d72c870e0752a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-86502015000200100
network_acronym_str SBDPC-1
network_name_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?Liver RegenerationDisease Models, AnimalStem CellsRats PURPOSE: To evaluate which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size syndrome. METHODS: A total of 40 rats underwent partial hepatectomy (70%) that induces the small-for-size syndrome and were divided into four groups of route administration: intravenous, intraperitoneal, enteral and tracheal. The small-for-size syndrome model was designed with extended partial hepatectomy (70%). The animals were divided into four groups of routes administration: intravenous (n=10) - intravenously through the dorsal vein of the penis; intraperitoneal (n=10) - intraperitoneally in the abdominal cavity; enteral (n=10) - oroenteral with the placement of a number 4 urethral probe and maintained at third duodenal portion; tracheal (n=10) - after tracheal intubation. We track the animals and monitor them for 21 days; during this follow-up we evaluated the result of cell therapy application tracking animals using ultrasound, radiography and PET-scan. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software(r). Differences were considered significant with the p<0.05. Data are presented as the median and variation for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were made using analysis of the imaging test by the researchers. RESULTS: All four groups underwent partial hepatectomy of 70% liver tissue targeting the same weight of resected liver. Initially the PET-scan tests showed similarity in administered cells by different routes. However, in few days the route of intravenous administration showed to be the most appropriated to lead cells to the liver followed by enteral. The tracheal and peritoneal routes were not as much successful for this goal. CONCLUSION: The intravenous route is the best one to cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size-syndrome. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502015000200100Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.30 n.2 2015reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86502015002000003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNacif,Lucas SoutoFerreira,Amanda OlivottiMaria,Durvanei AugustoKubrusly,Márcia SaldanhaMolan,NilzaChaib,EleazarD'Albuquerque,Luiz CarneiroAndraus,Wellingtoneng2015-07-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502015000200100Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2015-07-02T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
title Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
spellingShingle Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
Nacif,Lucas Souto
Liver Regeneration
Disease Models, Animal
Stem Cells
Rats
title_short Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
title_full Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
title_fullStr Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
title_full_unstemmed Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
title_sort Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?
author Nacif,Lucas Souto
author_facet Nacif,Lucas Souto
Ferreira,Amanda Olivotti
Maria,Durvanei Augusto
Kubrusly,Márcia Saldanha
Molan,Nilza
Chaib,Eleazar
D'Albuquerque,Luiz Carneiro
Andraus,Wellington
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Amanda Olivotti
Maria,Durvanei Augusto
Kubrusly,Márcia Saldanha
Molan,Nilza
Chaib,Eleazar
D'Albuquerque,Luiz Carneiro
Andraus,Wellington
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nacif,Lucas Souto
Ferreira,Amanda Olivotti
Maria,Durvanei Augusto
Kubrusly,Márcia Saldanha
Molan,Nilza
Chaib,Eleazar
D'Albuquerque,Luiz Carneiro
Andraus,Wellington
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liver Regeneration
Disease Models, Animal
Stem Cells
Rats
topic Liver Regeneration
Disease Models, Animal
Stem Cells
Rats
description PURPOSE: To evaluate which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size syndrome. METHODS: A total of 40 rats underwent partial hepatectomy (70%) that induces the small-for-size syndrome and were divided into four groups of route administration: intravenous, intraperitoneal, enteral and tracheal. The small-for-size syndrome model was designed with extended partial hepatectomy (70%). The animals were divided into four groups of routes administration: intravenous (n=10) - intravenously through the dorsal vein of the penis; intraperitoneal (n=10) - intraperitoneally in the abdominal cavity; enteral (n=10) - oroenteral with the placement of a number 4 urethral probe and maintained at third duodenal portion; tracheal (n=10) - after tracheal intubation. We track the animals and monitor them for 21 days; during this follow-up we evaluated the result of cell therapy application tracking animals using ultrasound, radiography and PET-scan. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software(r). Differences were considered significant with the p<0.05. Data are presented as the median and variation for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were made using analysis of the imaging test by the researchers. RESULTS: All four groups underwent partial hepatectomy of 70% liver tissue targeting the same weight of resected liver. Initially the PET-scan tests showed similarity in administered cells by different routes. However, in few days the route of intravenous administration showed to be the most appropriated to lead cells to the liver followed by enteral. The tracheal and peritoneal routes were not as much successful for this goal. CONCLUSION: The intravenous route is the best one to cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size-syndrome.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502015000200100
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502015000200100
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-86502015002000003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.30 n.2 2015
reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron:SBDPC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron_str SBDPC
institution SBDPC
reponame_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sgolden@terra.com.br
_version_ 1752126443094016000