Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima,Rodrigo Lira Sousa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Oliveira,Eduardo Jose Silva Gomes de, Pereira,Emanuel Cabral, Costa,Lucas da Silva, Dourado,Thiago Sousa, Valadão,José Aparecido, Lima,Roclides Castro, Campelo,Giuliano Peixoto, Brito,Roger Moura de, Oliveira,Caio Márcio Barros de, Moura,Ed Carlos Rey, Leal,Plinio da Cunha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502020000300800
Resumo: Abstract Purpose: To compare the satisfaction levels about the surgery and anesthesia management, and to analyze the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty surgeries in a private hospital in Sao Luís-MA. Methods: The sample consisted of patients undergoing Bypass and Sleeve bariatric surgeries from August 2018 to August 2019, who were in the range of 18 and 70 years old and had not used drugs or presented cardiac arrhythmias, dilated cardiomyopathy, and conduction disorder heart. Data were collected from the evaluation forms and recorded in a form with closed questions. Results: Most patients were female (Bypass – 56% and Sleeve – 67.4%) and aged between 30 and 39 years old (Bypass – 32% and Sleeve – 55.8%). Information (Bypass – 92% and Sleeve – 86.1%) was the highest satisfaction index found. Sleepiness in the immediate postoperative period (Bypass – 92% and Sleeve – 93%) was the main side effect. There were no postoperative complications in patients between the two types of surgery. Conclusions: Patients submitted to Bypass and Sleeve were completely satisfied with the perioperative management. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing adverse effects between the techniques.
id SBDPC-1_bb29e9c281b72eae90a91ab871858612
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-86502020000300800
network_acronym_str SBDPC-1
network_name_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MAObesityGastroplastyGastric BypassAbstract Purpose: To compare the satisfaction levels about the surgery and anesthesia management, and to analyze the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty surgeries in a private hospital in Sao Luís-MA. Methods: The sample consisted of patients undergoing Bypass and Sleeve bariatric surgeries from August 2018 to August 2019, who were in the range of 18 and 70 years old and had not used drugs or presented cardiac arrhythmias, dilated cardiomyopathy, and conduction disorder heart. Data were collected from the evaluation forms and recorded in a form with closed questions. Results: Most patients were female (Bypass – 56% and Sleeve – 67.4%) and aged between 30 and 39 years old (Bypass – 32% and Sleeve – 55.8%). Information (Bypass – 92% and Sleeve – 86.1%) was the highest satisfaction index found. Sleepiness in the immediate postoperative period (Bypass – 92% and Sleeve – 93%) was the main side effect. There were no postoperative complications in patients between the two types of surgery. Conclusions: Patients submitted to Bypass and Sleeve were completely satisfied with the perioperative management. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing adverse effects between the techniques.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502020000300800Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.35 n.3 2020reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/s0102-865020200030000007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Rodrigo Lira SousaOliveira,Eduardo Jose Silva Gomes dePereira,Emanuel CabralCosta,Lucas da SilvaDourado,Thiago SousaValadão,José AparecidoLima,Roclides CastroCampelo,Giuliano PeixotoBrito,Roger Moura deOliveira,Caio Márcio Barros deMoura,Ed Carlos ReyLeal,Plinio da Cunhaeng2020-05-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502020000300800Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2020-05-18T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
title Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
spellingShingle Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
Lima,Rodrigo Lira Sousa
Obesity
Gastroplasty
Gastric Bypass
title_short Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
title_full Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
title_fullStr Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
title_sort Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA
author Lima,Rodrigo Lira Sousa
author_facet Lima,Rodrigo Lira Sousa
Oliveira,Eduardo Jose Silva Gomes de
Pereira,Emanuel Cabral
Costa,Lucas da Silva
Dourado,Thiago Sousa
Valadão,José Aparecido
Lima,Roclides Castro
Campelo,Giuliano Peixoto
Brito,Roger Moura de
Oliveira,Caio Márcio Barros de
Moura,Ed Carlos Rey
Leal,Plinio da Cunha
author_role author
author2 Oliveira,Eduardo Jose Silva Gomes de
Pereira,Emanuel Cabral
Costa,Lucas da Silva
Dourado,Thiago Sousa
Valadão,José Aparecido
Lima,Roclides Castro
Campelo,Giuliano Peixoto
Brito,Roger Moura de
Oliveira,Caio Márcio Barros de
Moura,Ed Carlos Rey
Leal,Plinio da Cunha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima,Rodrigo Lira Sousa
Oliveira,Eduardo Jose Silva Gomes de
Pereira,Emanuel Cabral
Costa,Lucas da Silva
Dourado,Thiago Sousa
Valadão,José Aparecido
Lima,Roclides Castro
Campelo,Giuliano Peixoto
Brito,Roger Moura de
Oliveira,Caio Márcio Barros de
Moura,Ed Carlos Rey
Leal,Plinio da Cunha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Obesity
Gastroplasty
Gastric Bypass
topic Obesity
Gastroplasty
Gastric Bypass
description Abstract Purpose: To compare the satisfaction levels about the surgery and anesthesia management, and to analyze the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty surgeries in a private hospital in Sao Luís-MA. Methods: The sample consisted of patients undergoing Bypass and Sleeve bariatric surgeries from August 2018 to August 2019, who were in the range of 18 and 70 years old and had not used drugs or presented cardiac arrhythmias, dilated cardiomyopathy, and conduction disorder heart. Data were collected from the evaluation forms and recorded in a form with closed questions. Results: Most patients were female (Bypass – 56% and Sleeve – 67.4%) and aged between 30 and 39 years old (Bypass – 32% and Sleeve – 55.8%). Information (Bypass – 92% and Sleeve – 86.1%) was the highest satisfaction index found. Sleepiness in the immediate postoperative period (Bypass – 92% and Sleeve – 93%) was the main side effect. There were no postoperative complications in patients between the two types of surgery. Conclusions: Patients submitted to Bypass and Sleeve were completely satisfied with the perioperative management. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing adverse effects between the techniques.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502020000300800
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502020000300800
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-865020200030000007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.35 n.3 2020
reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron:SBDPC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron_str SBDPC
institution SBDPC
reponame_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sgolden@terra.com.br
_version_ 1752126445773127680