Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000100200 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the hepatic protective effect of both remote and local postconditioning (POS). Methods: Twenty-eight Wistar rats were assigned into four groups: sham group(SHAM), ischemia-reperfusion group (IR), local ischemic POS group (lPOS) and remote ischemic POS group (rPOS). Animals were subjected to liver ischemia for 30 min. Local ischemic POS group consisted of four cycles of 5 min liver ischemia, followed by 5 min reperfusion (40 min). Remote ischemic POS group consisted of four cycles of 5 min hind limb ischemia, followed by 5 min hind limb perfusion after the main liver ischemia period. After 190 minutes median and left liver lobes were harvested for biochemical and histopathology analysis. Results: All the conditioning techniques were able to increase the level of bothglutathione reductase and peroxidase, showing higher values in the rPOS group when compared to the lPOS. Also, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were higher in all intervention groups when compared to SHAM, but rPOS had the lower rates of increase, showing the best result. The histopathology analysis showed that all groups had worst injury levels than SHAM, but rPOS had lower degrees of damage when compared to the lPOS, although it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Remote postconditioning is a promising technique to reduce liver ischemia-reperfusion injury, once it increased antioxidants substances and reduced the damage. |
id |
SBDPC-1_cc6dd0a72184a529227a69573a9585fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-86502021000100200 |
network_acronym_str |
SBDPC-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in ratsIschemiaReperfusion InjuryIschemic PostconditioningAntioxidantsRatsABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the hepatic protective effect of both remote and local postconditioning (POS). Methods: Twenty-eight Wistar rats were assigned into four groups: sham group(SHAM), ischemia-reperfusion group (IR), local ischemic POS group (lPOS) and remote ischemic POS group (rPOS). Animals were subjected to liver ischemia for 30 min. Local ischemic POS group consisted of four cycles of 5 min liver ischemia, followed by 5 min reperfusion (40 min). Remote ischemic POS group consisted of four cycles of 5 min hind limb ischemia, followed by 5 min hind limb perfusion after the main liver ischemia period. After 190 minutes median and left liver lobes were harvested for biochemical and histopathology analysis. Results: All the conditioning techniques were able to increase the level of bothglutathione reductase and peroxidase, showing higher values in the rPOS group when compared to the lPOS. Also, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were higher in all intervention groups when compared to SHAM, but rPOS had the lower rates of increase, showing the best result. The histopathology analysis showed that all groups had worst injury levels than SHAM, but rPOS had lower degrees of damage when compared to the lPOS, although it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Remote postconditioning is a promising technique to reduce liver ischemia-reperfusion injury, once it increased antioxidants substances and reduced the damage.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000100200Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.36 n.1 2021reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/acb360101info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYasojima,Edson YuzurDomingues,Robson José de SouzaSilva,Renata CunhaSousa,Luis Fernando Freitas deTrindade Júnior,Sérgio Cunhaeng2021-01-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502021000100200Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2021-01-29T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats |
title |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats Yasojima,Edson Yuzur Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Ischemic Postconditioning Antioxidants Rats |
title_short |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats |
title_full |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats |
title_sort |
Comparison of remote and local postconditioning against hepatic ischemic-reperfusion injury in rats |
author |
Yasojima,Edson Yuzur |
author_facet |
Yasojima,Edson Yuzur Domingues,Robson José de Souza Silva,Renata Cunha Sousa,Luis Fernando Freitas de Trindade Júnior,Sérgio Cunha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Domingues,Robson José de Souza Silva,Renata Cunha Sousa,Luis Fernando Freitas de Trindade Júnior,Sérgio Cunha |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Yasojima,Edson Yuzur Domingues,Robson José de Souza Silva,Renata Cunha Sousa,Luis Fernando Freitas de Trindade Júnior,Sérgio Cunha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Ischemic Postconditioning Antioxidants Rats |
topic |
Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Ischemic Postconditioning Antioxidants Rats |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the hepatic protective effect of both remote and local postconditioning (POS). Methods: Twenty-eight Wistar rats were assigned into four groups: sham group(SHAM), ischemia-reperfusion group (IR), local ischemic POS group (lPOS) and remote ischemic POS group (rPOS). Animals were subjected to liver ischemia for 30 min. Local ischemic POS group consisted of four cycles of 5 min liver ischemia, followed by 5 min reperfusion (40 min). Remote ischemic POS group consisted of four cycles of 5 min hind limb ischemia, followed by 5 min hind limb perfusion after the main liver ischemia period. After 190 minutes median and left liver lobes were harvested for biochemical and histopathology analysis. Results: All the conditioning techniques were able to increase the level of bothglutathione reductase and peroxidase, showing higher values in the rPOS group when compared to the lPOS. Also, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were higher in all intervention groups when compared to SHAM, but rPOS had the lower rates of increase, showing the best result. The histopathology analysis showed that all groups had worst injury levels than SHAM, but rPOS had lower degrees of damage when compared to the lPOS, although it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Remote postconditioning is a promising technique to reduce liver ischemia-reperfusion injury, once it increased antioxidants substances and reduced the damage. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000100200 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000100200 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/acb360101 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.36 n.1 2021 reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) instacron:SBDPC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
instacron_str |
SBDPC |
institution |
SBDPC |
reponame_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sgolden@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126445910491136 |