CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia Agrícola |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000200196 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Crop growth simulation models such as WOFOST and DSSAT are useful, but require several inputs that sometimes are not available, especially in developing areas. In addition, measured data is usually time and labor-intensive. In search of faster and easier methods for soybean estimates, this study presents a lower input requiring methodology for yield estimation. This study combines the FAO-33 yield model with the agro-ecological zone approach for soybean yield estimations using mostly indirect data. Sowing and harvest dates and yield were collected from 74 soybean commercial farms. Agrometeorological data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) were used. Fifty farms (66%) were used to calibrate the model and 24 farm areas (33%) were used for evaluation purposes. Two methodologies (FAO-56 and Thornthwaite and Mather) for water balance and actual evapotranspiration (ETa) estimations were used. The comparison of yield estimations and observations showed that the use of low data input to obtain reasonable accuracy, with a mean error of −310 kg ha−1 and a mean absolute percentage error of 23.3%. |
id |
SBEA-1_23fe1c71033bc19ae11f55bf2cd96bb4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69162021000200196 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEA-1 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATIONwater balanceevapotranspirationThornthwaite and MatherABSTRACT Crop growth simulation models such as WOFOST and DSSAT are useful, but require several inputs that sometimes are not available, especially in developing areas. In addition, measured data is usually time and labor-intensive. In search of faster and easier methods for soybean estimates, this study presents a lower input requiring methodology for yield estimation. This study combines the FAO-33 yield model with the agro-ecological zone approach for soybean yield estimations using mostly indirect data. Sowing and harvest dates and yield were collected from 74 soybean commercial farms. Agrometeorological data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) were used. Fifty farms (66%) were used to calibrate the model and 24 farm areas (33%) were used for evaluation purposes. Two methodologies (FAO-56 and Thornthwaite and Mather) for water balance and actual evapotranspiration (ETa) estimations were used. The comparison of yield estimations and observations showed that the use of low data input to obtain reasonable accuracy, with a mean error of −310 kg ha−1 and a mean absolute percentage error of 23.3%.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000200196Engenharia Agrícola v.41 n.2 2021reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v41n2p196-203/2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRichetti,JonathanJohann,Jerry AdrianiUribe-Opazo,Miguel Angeleng2021-04-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162021000200196Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2021-04-23T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION |
title |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION |
spellingShingle |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION Richetti,Jonathan water balance evapotranspiration Thornthwaite and Mather |
title_short |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION |
title_full |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION |
title_fullStr |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION |
title_sort |
CROP MODELING WITH LESS DATA: THE FAO MODEL FOR SOYBEAN YIELD ESTIMATION |
author |
Richetti,Jonathan |
author_facet |
Richetti,Jonathan Johann,Jerry Adriani Uribe-Opazo,Miguel Angel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Johann,Jerry Adriani Uribe-Opazo,Miguel Angel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Richetti,Jonathan Johann,Jerry Adriani Uribe-Opazo,Miguel Angel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
water balance evapotranspiration Thornthwaite and Mather |
topic |
water balance evapotranspiration Thornthwaite and Mather |
description |
ABSTRACT Crop growth simulation models such as WOFOST and DSSAT are useful, but require several inputs that sometimes are not available, especially in developing areas. In addition, measured data is usually time and labor-intensive. In search of faster and easier methods for soybean estimates, this study presents a lower input requiring methodology for yield estimation. This study combines the FAO-33 yield model with the agro-ecological zone approach for soybean yield estimations using mostly indirect data. Sowing and harvest dates and yield were collected from 74 soybean commercial farms. Agrometeorological data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) were used. Fifty farms (66%) were used to calibrate the model and 24 farm areas (33%) were used for evaluation purposes. Two methodologies (FAO-56 and Thornthwaite and Mather) for water balance and actual evapotranspiration (ETa) estimations were used. The comparison of yield estimations and observations showed that the use of low data input to obtain reasonable accuracy, with a mean error of −310 kg ha−1 and a mean absolute percentage error of 23.3%. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000200196 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000200196 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v41n2p196-203/2021 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola v.41 n.2 2021 reponame:Engenharia Agrícola instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) instacron:SBEA |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
instacron_str |
SBEA |
institution |
SBEA |
reponame_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
collection |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126274952757248 |