MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia Agrícola |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000400438 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Covered lagoon biodigesters (CLB) have been widespread in Brazil in the treatment of pig manure. However, the quantification of biogas production in CLB using mathematical models is still limited and scarce. This study aimed to evaluate and compare six mathematical models—Chen-Hashimoto (Chen, 1983), CETESB (2006), COD Conversion (Chernicharo, 2016), IPCC (2006), Deng (Deng et al., 2014), and modified Stover-Kincannon (Yu et al., 1998)—usually used to estimate methane (CH 4 ), and propose improvements to the models, if necessary. The results were compared with the monitored production (P actual ) in a farm with CLB using the t-test (α = 5%). The Chen-Hashimoto, IPCC, Deng, and modified Stover-Kincannon models showed no statistical difference compared to P actual (405.0 m 3 CH 4 d −1 ), whereas the CETESB and COD Conversion models presented no statistical difference after the proposed improvements. All models can be considered reliable for estimating volumetric methane production after the adaptations, being relevant tools for diagnosis and decision-making regarding the energy recovery of biogas with CLB operation in pig farms. |
id |
SBEA-1_3881078e18dadaa858edc37dd69f13e4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69162021000400438 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEA-1 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANUREbiogaspig manureanaerobic digestionmodelingABSTRACT Covered lagoon biodigesters (CLB) have been widespread in Brazil in the treatment of pig manure. However, the quantification of biogas production in CLB using mathematical models is still limited and scarce. This study aimed to evaluate and compare six mathematical models—Chen-Hashimoto (Chen, 1983), CETESB (2006), COD Conversion (Chernicharo, 2016), IPCC (2006), Deng (Deng et al., 2014), and modified Stover-Kincannon (Yu et al., 1998)—usually used to estimate methane (CH 4 ), and propose improvements to the models, if necessary. The results were compared with the monitored production (P actual ) in a farm with CLB using the t-test (α = 5%). The Chen-Hashimoto, IPCC, Deng, and modified Stover-Kincannon models showed no statistical difference compared to P actual (405.0 m 3 CH 4 d −1 ), whereas the CETESB and COD Conversion models presented no statistical difference after the proposed improvements. All models can be considered reliable for estimating volumetric methane production after the adaptations, being relevant tools for diagnosis and decision-making regarding the energy recovery of biogas with CLB operation in pig farms.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000400438Engenharia Agrícola v.41 n.4 2021reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v41n4p438-448/2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes,Juciara O.Rosa,André P.Sousa,Izabelle de P.Oliveira,Nathalia S.Borges,Alisson C.eng2021-09-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162021000400438Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2021-09-13T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE |
title |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE |
spellingShingle |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE Lopes,Juciara O. biogas pig manure anaerobic digestion modeling |
title_short |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE |
title_full |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE |
title_fullStr |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE |
title_full_unstemmed |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE |
title_sort |
MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR ESTIMATING METHANE PRODUCTION IN COVERED LAGOON BIODIGESTERS TREATING PIG MANURE |
author |
Lopes,Juciara O. |
author_facet |
Lopes,Juciara O. Rosa,André P. Sousa,Izabelle de P. Oliveira,Nathalia S. Borges,Alisson C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rosa,André P. Sousa,Izabelle de P. Oliveira,Nathalia S. Borges,Alisson C. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes,Juciara O. Rosa,André P. Sousa,Izabelle de P. Oliveira,Nathalia S. Borges,Alisson C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biogas pig manure anaerobic digestion modeling |
topic |
biogas pig manure anaerobic digestion modeling |
description |
ABSTRACT Covered lagoon biodigesters (CLB) have been widespread in Brazil in the treatment of pig manure. However, the quantification of biogas production in CLB using mathematical models is still limited and scarce. This study aimed to evaluate and compare six mathematical models—Chen-Hashimoto (Chen, 1983), CETESB (2006), COD Conversion (Chernicharo, 2016), IPCC (2006), Deng (Deng et al., 2014), and modified Stover-Kincannon (Yu et al., 1998)—usually used to estimate methane (CH 4 ), and propose improvements to the models, if necessary. The results were compared with the monitored production (P actual ) in a farm with CLB using the t-test (α = 5%). The Chen-Hashimoto, IPCC, Deng, and modified Stover-Kincannon models showed no statistical difference compared to P actual (405.0 m 3 CH 4 d −1 ), whereas the CETESB and COD Conversion models presented no statistical difference after the proposed improvements. All models can be considered reliable for estimating volumetric methane production after the adaptations, being relevant tools for diagnosis and decision-making regarding the energy recovery of biogas with CLB operation in pig farms. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000400438 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162021000400438 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v41n4p438-448/2021 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola v.41 n.4 2021 reponame:Engenharia Agrícola instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) instacron:SBEA |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
instacron_str |
SBEA |
institution |
SBEA |
reponame_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
collection |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126275247407104 |