Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: CRISTIANO,ZERBATO
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: COMPAGNON,ARIEL M., VOLTARELLI,MURILO A., ROSALEN,DAVID L., FURLANI,CARLOS E. A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400696
Resumo: ABSTRACT The mechanical resistance to penetration when related to the water content is an indicator often used of soil compaction, the use of positioning methods for greater accuracy of this review is important. In this context, this study aimed to determine the variability of positioning methods provided by GPS receivers to determine the spatial behavior of physical attributes related to soil compaction. The study area is located in the municipality of Jaboticabal, around the latitude 21º15’22”S and longitude 48º18’58”W, being characterized with a clayey Oxisol. The variables used as parameters of soil physical properties were the mechanical resistance to penetration and water content, using a sampling grid of 20 x 20 m, totaling 60 points. We used six models of GPS receivers: Garmin Etrex Vista, Garmin Etrex 30, Ashtech MM6, Trimble Nomad, Garmin Map 62 and Trimble R6, with all georeferenced points in the regular grid intersections. The georeferencing using GPS receivers (single point positioning and post-processed differential correction) interfered in characterizing the spatial variability of soil resistance to penetration, differently for some receivers to the water content attribute. Positioning methods with post-processed differential correction, using R6 and MM6 models, better define the management zones of soil resistance to penetration.
id SBEA-1_6ba7320cf5a9d47d80cc599bef127501
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162016000400696
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigationGPSpenetrometersoil compactionsoil water contentABSTRACT The mechanical resistance to penetration when related to the water content is an indicator often used of soil compaction, the use of positioning methods for greater accuracy of this review is important. In this context, this study aimed to determine the variability of positioning methods provided by GPS receivers to determine the spatial behavior of physical attributes related to soil compaction. The study area is located in the municipality of Jaboticabal, around the latitude 21º15’22”S and longitude 48º18’58”W, being characterized with a clayey Oxisol. The variables used as parameters of soil physical properties were the mechanical resistance to penetration and water content, using a sampling grid of 20 x 20 m, totaling 60 points. We used six models of GPS receivers: Garmin Etrex Vista, Garmin Etrex 30, Ashtech MM6, Trimble Nomad, Garmin Map 62 and Trimble R6, with all georeferenced points in the regular grid intersections. The georeferencing using GPS receivers (single point positioning and post-processed differential correction) interfered in characterizing the spatial variability of soil resistance to penetration, differently for some receivers to the water content attribute. Positioning methods with post-processed differential correction, using R6 and MM6 models, better define the management zones of soil resistance to penetration.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400696Engenharia Agrícola v.36 n.4 2016reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n4p696-705/2016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCRISTIANO,ZERBATOCOMPAGNON,ARIEL M.VOLTARELLI,MURILO A.ROSALEN,DAVID L.FURLANI,CARLOS E. A.eng2016-09-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162016000400696Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2016-09-21T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
spellingShingle Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
CRISTIANO,ZERBATO
GPS
penetrometer
soil compaction
soil water content
title_short Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_full Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_fullStr Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_full_unstemmed Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
title_sort Variations on the expertise of two attributes of physical soil due to differences in the method of global satellite navigation
author CRISTIANO,ZERBATO
author_facet CRISTIANO,ZERBATO
COMPAGNON,ARIEL M.
VOLTARELLI,MURILO A.
ROSALEN,DAVID L.
FURLANI,CARLOS E. A.
author_role author
author2 COMPAGNON,ARIEL M.
VOLTARELLI,MURILO A.
ROSALEN,DAVID L.
FURLANI,CARLOS E. A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv CRISTIANO,ZERBATO
COMPAGNON,ARIEL M.
VOLTARELLI,MURILO A.
ROSALEN,DAVID L.
FURLANI,CARLOS E. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv GPS
penetrometer
soil compaction
soil water content
topic GPS
penetrometer
soil compaction
soil water content
description ABSTRACT The mechanical resistance to penetration when related to the water content is an indicator often used of soil compaction, the use of positioning methods for greater accuracy of this review is important. In this context, this study aimed to determine the variability of positioning methods provided by GPS receivers to determine the spatial behavior of physical attributes related to soil compaction. The study area is located in the municipality of Jaboticabal, around the latitude 21º15’22”S and longitude 48º18’58”W, being characterized with a clayey Oxisol. The variables used as parameters of soil physical properties were the mechanical resistance to penetration and water content, using a sampling grid of 20 x 20 m, totaling 60 points. We used six models of GPS receivers: Garmin Etrex Vista, Garmin Etrex 30, Ashtech MM6, Trimble Nomad, Garmin Map 62 and Trimble R6, with all georeferenced points in the regular grid intersections. The georeferencing using GPS receivers (single point positioning and post-processed differential correction) interfered in characterizing the spatial variability of soil resistance to penetration, differently for some receivers to the water content attribute. Positioning methods with post-processed differential correction, using R6 and MM6 models, better define the management zones of soil resistance to penetration.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400696
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400696
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n4p696-705/2016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.36 n.4 2016
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126272813662208