INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia Agrícola |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162018000300417 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of six different horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSF-CWs), with different substrates (gravel and crushed PET bottles), which also varied in relation to the presence and arrangement of plant species (elephant grass and Tifton 85 bermudagrass) in the removal of pollutants from a bulk milk cooling tank (MTWW). Each bed was fed at a flow rate of 0.18 m3 d-1 and average organic load rate (OLR) of 318 kg ha-1 d-1 of BOD5, with hydraulic detention time (HRT) of 1.84 days in the gravel-filled HSSF-CWs (CWS-G) and 2.97 days in the PET-filled HSSF-CWs (CWs-P). The CWs-P were as efficient as the CWs-G in the removal of BOD5, COD, Total-P, and K-Total, being in some cases even more effective (turbidity, TS, TSS and Na). The gravel, on the other hand, provided greater removals of Total-N from the MTWW. In the non-cultivated CWs and those cultivated with elephant grass, in its first half and Tifton 85 grass in its second half, there were higher average efficiencies in COD and TSS removal sand, in the latter, the highest average removal of Total-N. |
id |
SBEA-1_7a2779cce888b05a6d60175ff70610c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69162018000300417 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEA-1 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDSwastewaterelephant grassTifton 85 bermudagrassplantsporosityABSTRACT We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of six different horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSF-CWs), with different substrates (gravel and crushed PET bottles), which also varied in relation to the presence and arrangement of plant species (elephant grass and Tifton 85 bermudagrass) in the removal of pollutants from a bulk milk cooling tank (MTWW). Each bed was fed at a flow rate of 0.18 m3 d-1 and average organic load rate (OLR) of 318 kg ha-1 d-1 of BOD5, with hydraulic detention time (HRT) of 1.84 days in the gravel-filled HSSF-CWs (CWS-G) and 2.97 days in the PET-filled HSSF-CWs (CWs-P). The CWs-P were as efficient as the CWs-G in the removal of BOD5, COD, Total-P, and K-Total, being in some cases even more effective (turbidity, TS, TSS and Na). The gravel, on the other hand, provided greater removals of Total-N from the MTWW. In the non-cultivated CWs and those cultivated with elephant grass, in its first half and Tifton 85 grass in its second half, there were higher average efficiencies in COD and TSS removal sand, in the latter, the highest average removal of Total-N.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162018000300417Engenharia Agrícola v.38 n.3 2018reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v38n3p417-425/2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSaraiva,Claudety B.Matos,Antonio T.Matos,Mateus P.Miranda,Suymara T.eng2018-06-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162018000300417Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2018-06-12T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS |
title |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS |
spellingShingle |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS Saraiva,Claudety B. wastewater elephant grass Tifton 85 bermudagrass plants porosity |
title_short |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS |
title_full |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS |
title_fullStr |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS |
title_full_unstemmed |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS |
title_sort |
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE AND SPECIES ARRANGEMENT OF CULTIVATED GRASSES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS |
author |
Saraiva,Claudety B. |
author_facet |
Saraiva,Claudety B. Matos,Antonio T. Matos,Mateus P. Miranda,Suymara T. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos,Antonio T. Matos,Mateus P. Miranda,Suymara T. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Saraiva,Claudety B. Matos,Antonio T. Matos,Mateus P. Miranda,Suymara T. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
wastewater elephant grass Tifton 85 bermudagrass plants porosity |
topic |
wastewater elephant grass Tifton 85 bermudagrass plants porosity |
description |
ABSTRACT We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of six different horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSF-CWs), with different substrates (gravel and crushed PET bottles), which also varied in relation to the presence and arrangement of plant species (elephant grass and Tifton 85 bermudagrass) in the removal of pollutants from a bulk milk cooling tank (MTWW). Each bed was fed at a flow rate of 0.18 m3 d-1 and average organic load rate (OLR) of 318 kg ha-1 d-1 of BOD5, with hydraulic detention time (HRT) of 1.84 days in the gravel-filled HSSF-CWs (CWS-G) and 2.97 days in the PET-filled HSSF-CWs (CWs-P). The CWs-P were as efficient as the CWs-G in the removal of BOD5, COD, Total-P, and K-Total, being in some cases even more effective (turbidity, TS, TSS and Na). The gravel, on the other hand, provided greater removals of Total-N from the MTWW. In the non-cultivated CWs and those cultivated with elephant grass, in its first half and Tifton 85 grass in its second half, there were higher average efficiencies in COD and TSS removal sand, in the latter, the highest average removal of Total-N. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162018000300417 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162018000300417 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v38n3p417-425/2018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola v.38 n.3 2018 reponame:Engenharia Agrícola instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) instacron:SBEA |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
instacron_str |
SBEA |
institution |
SBEA |
reponame_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
collection |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126273706000384 |