CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques Filho,Aldir C.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Testa,João V. P., Moura,Michel S., Martins,Murilo B., Lanças,Kléber P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162022000200201
Resumo: ABSTRACT The quality of the basal cut of sugarcane during harvest can affect the longevity of the crop, and the cutting tool is one of the main causes of damage during harvesting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two cutting tools: an impact cutting system (ICS) using knives and a continuous cutting system (CCS) using saws. Laboratory tests were carried out to obtain the stalk damage index at different device travel speeds and to determine the invisible losses caused by each cutting system. The results showed that both cutting systems presented acceptable levels for the stalk damage index; however, the CCS obtained better cut quality, corresponding with decreased general damage. The invisible losses caused by the cutting tools in relation to the total harvested mass were 0.52% and 0.54% for the CCS and ICS, respectively. The highest invisible losses were obtained at speeds of 2, 3, and 4 km h-1 for the ICS, showing a statistical difference in relation to the CCS. No statistical difference was noted for both the systems at 5 and 6 km h-1.
id SBEA-1_9a6ec09c6c20df900cbc15aaa008331e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162022000200201
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTERSaccharum officinarummechanized harvesterdamage indexinvisible lossesABSTRACT The quality of the basal cut of sugarcane during harvest can affect the longevity of the crop, and the cutting tool is one of the main causes of damage during harvesting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two cutting tools: an impact cutting system (ICS) using knives and a continuous cutting system (CCS) using saws. Laboratory tests were carried out to obtain the stalk damage index at different device travel speeds and to determine the invisible losses caused by each cutting system. The results showed that both cutting systems presented acceptable levels for the stalk damage index; however, the CCS obtained better cut quality, corresponding with decreased general damage. The invisible losses caused by the cutting tools in relation to the total harvested mass were 0.52% and 0.54% for the CCS and ICS, respectively. The highest invisible losses were obtained at speeds of 2, 3, and 4 km h-1 for the ICS, showing a statistical difference in relation to the CCS. No statistical difference was noted for both the systems at 5 and 6 km h-1.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162022000200201Engenharia Agrícola v.42 n.2 2022reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v42n2e20210167/2022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques Filho,Aldir C.Testa,João V. P.Moura,Michel S.Martins,Murilo B.Lanças,Kléber P.eng2022-04-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162022000200201Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2022-04-06T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
title CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
spellingShingle CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
Marques Filho,Aldir C.
Saccharum officinarum
mechanized harvester
damage index
invisible losses
title_short CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
title_full CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
title_fullStr CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
title_full_unstemmed CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
title_sort CONTINUOUS AND IMPACT CUTTING SYSTEMS FOR SUGARCANE HARVESTER
author Marques Filho,Aldir C.
author_facet Marques Filho,Aldir C.
Testa,João V. P.
Moura,Michel S.
Martins,Murilo B.
Lanças,Kléber P.
author_role author
author2 Testa,João V. P.
Moura,Michel S.
Martins,Murilo B.
Lanças,Kléber P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques Filho,Aldir C.
Testa,João V. P.
Moura,Michel S.
Martins,Murilo B.
Lanças,Kléber P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saccharum officinarum
mechanized harvester
damage index
invisible losses
topic Saccharum officinarum
mechanized harvester
damage index
invisible losses
description ABSTRACT The quality of the basal cut of sugarcane during harvest can affect the longevity of the crop, and the cutting tool is one of the main causes of damage during harvesting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two cutting tools: an impact cutting system (ICS) using knives and a continuous cutting system (CCS) using saws. Laboratory tests were carried out to obtain the stalk damage index at different device travel speeds and to determine the invisible losses caused by each cutting system. The results showed that both cutting systems presented acceptable levels for the stalk damage index; however, the CCS obtained better cut quality, corresponding with decreased general damage. The invisible losses caused by the cutting tools in relation to the total harvested mass were 0.52% and 0.54% for the CCS and ICS, respectively. The highest invisible losses were obtained at speeds of 2, 3, and 4 km h-1 for the ICS, showing a statistical difference in relation to the CCS. No statistical difference was noted for both the systems at 5 and 6 km h-1.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162022000200201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162022000200201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v42n2e20210167/2022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.42 n.2 2022
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126275309273088