Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Primo,Marcelo A.
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Gurgacz,Flavio, Kunz,Vilson L., Primo,Lucas I., Furlan,Fernando, Silva,Suedêmio L., Gabriel Filho,Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162008000300013
Resumo: Farmers have difficult of determining the evenness of transverse distribution and the working width, due the tests with this aim require equipments and complex methodologies. So, this study evaluates some alternative containers with the aim to allow a more accessible adjustment of the full width of the solid fertilizer spreaders. Four different containers were tested: i) standard container constructed in accordance with ISO 5690/1; ii) container of polyethylene (plastic trays) with screen shading to prevent the ricochet of material; iii) containers composed by boxes of long-life milk, and iv) containers composed by flowerpots (number 3.5). Also, three different spreaders were used for the tests. Alternative containers showed greater retention of particles than the standardized containers. The full width of work obtained for the coefficients of variation of 12.5; 15; 17.5 and 20%, ranged due the containers in the different pathways. The flowerpots of polyethylene showed similar results to the standardized containers. The heights of the containers were more important for its efficiency than its area of collection.
id SBEA-1_a1fc567d4bb359f3c629f70498ba88a5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162008000300013
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreadersfertilization at throwagricultural machinesagricultural mechanizationFarmers have difficult of determining the evenness of transverse distribution and the working width, due the tests with this aim require equipments and complex methodologies. So, this study evaluates some alternative containers with the aim to allow a more accessible adjustment of the full width of the solid fertilizer spreaders. Four different containers were tested: i) standard container constructed in accordance with ISO 5690/1; ii) container of polyethylene (plastic trays) with screen shading to prevent the ricochet of material; iii) containers composed by boxes of long-life milk, and iv) containers composed by flowerpots (number 3.5). Also, three different spreaders were used for the tests. Alternative containers showed greater retention of particles than the standardized containers. The full width of work obtained for the coefficients of variation of 12.5; 15; 17.5 and 20%, ranged due the containers in the different pathways. The flowerpots of polyethylene showed similar results to the standardized containers. The heights of the containers were more important for its efficiency than its area of collection.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2008-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162008000300013Engenharia Agrícola v.28 n.3 2008reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/S0100-69162008000300013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrimo,Marcelo A.Gurgacz,FlavioKunz,Vilson L.Primo,Lucas I.Furlan,FernandoSilva,Suedêmio L.Gabriel Filho,Antonioeng2008-12-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162008000300013Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2008-12-15T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
title Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
spellingShingle Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
Primo,Marcelo A.
fertilization at throw
agricultural machines
agricultural mechanization
title_short Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
title_full Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
title_fullStr Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
title_sort Evaluation of alternative containers to determining the working width of fertilizer spreaders
author Primo,Marcelo A.
author_facet Primo,Marcelo A.
Gurgacz,Flavio
Kunz,Vilson L.
Primo,Lucas I.
Furlan,Fernando
Silva,Suedêmio L.
Gabriel Filho,Antonio
author_role author
author2 Gurgacz,Flavio
Kunz,Vilson L.
Primo,Lucas I.
Furlan,Fernando
Silva,Suedêmio L.
Gabriel Filho,Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Primo,Marcelo A.
Gurgacz,Flavio
Kunz,Vilson L.
Primo,Lucas I.
Furlan,Fernando
Silva,Suedêmio L.
Gabriel Filho,Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fertilization at throw
agricultural machines
agricultural mechanization
topic fertilization at throw
agricultural machines
agricultural mechanization
description Farmers have difficult of determining the evenness of transverse distribution and the working width, due the tests with this aim require equipments and complex methodologies. So, this study evaluates some alternative containers with the aim to allow a more accessible adjustment of the full width of the solid fertilizer spreaders. Four different containers were tested: i) standard container constructed in accordance with ISO 5690/1; ii) container of polyethylene (plastic trays) with screen shading to prevent the ricochet of material; iii) containers composed by boxes of long-life milk, and iv) containers composed by flowerpots (number 3.5). Also, three different spreaders were used for the tests. Alternative containers showed greater retention of particles than the standardized containers. The full width of work obtained for the coefficients of variation of 12.5; 15; 17.5 and 20%, ranged due the containers in the different pathways. The flowerpots of polyethylene showed similar results to the standardized containers. The heights of the containers were more important for its efficiency than its area of collection.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162008000300013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162008000300013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-69162008000300013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.28 n.3 2008
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126269399498752