Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia Agrícola |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400008 |
Resumo: | The soybean rust caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi is considered the main soybean disease and consequently the appropriate selection and the use of spraying equipment are vital for its control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of aerial application equipment for soybean rust control. It was used: Micronair AU 5000 at 10 L ha-1 (with oil) and at 20 L ha-1 (without oil); Stol ARD atomizer at 10 and 20 L ha-1 (both with oil) and Spectrum (electrostatic) at 10 L ha-1 (without oil). The adjuvant was cotton oil (1.0 L ha-1) with emulsifier (BR 455) at 0.025 L ha-1. The field trial was set up at the 3rd fungicide application, when f four replications of each treatment. There were no statistical differences among treatments related to fungicide deposits by at a Confidence Interval of 95%. It was observed that the best results were obtained with Micronair (10 L ha-1 with oil), Stol (20 L ha-1 with oil) and electrostatic system at 10 L ha-1 with the lowest relative humidity (64%). |
id |
SBEA-1_cb32516f0a9771692b43071db264ea58 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69162011000400008 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEA-1 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust controlapplication equipmentsagricultural aviationfungicides depositsPhakopsora pachyrhiziThe soybean rust caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi is considered the main soybean disease and consequently the appropriate selection and the use of spraying equipment are vital for its control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of aerial application equipment for soybean rust control. It was used: Micronair AU 5000 at 10 L ha-1 (with oil) and at 20 L ha-1 (without oil); Stol ARD atomizer at 10 and 20 L ha-1 (both with oil) and Spectrum (electrostatic) at 10 L ha-1 (without oil). The adjuvant was cotton oil (1.0 L ha-1) with emulsifier (BR 455) at 0.025 L ha-1. The field trial was set up at the 3rd fungicide application, when f four replications of each treatment. There were no statistical differences among treatments related to fungicide deposits by at a Confidence Interval of 95%. It was observed that the best results were obtained with Micronair (10 L ha-1 with oil), Stol (20 L ha-1 with oil) and electrostatic system at 10 L ha-1 with the lowest relative humidity (64%).Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400008Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.4 2011reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/S0100-69162011000400008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntuniassi,Ulisses R.Velini,Edivaldo D.Oliveira,Rone B. dePeres-Oliveira,Maria A.Figueiredo,Zulema N.eng2016-07-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162011000400008Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2016-07-18T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control |
title |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control |
spellingShingle |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control Antuniassi,Ulisses R. application equipments agricultural aviation fungicides deposits Phakopsora pachyrhizi |
title_short |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control |
title_full |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control |
title_fullStr |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control |
title_sort |
Systems of aerial spraying for soybean rust control |
author |
Antuniassi,Ulisses R. |
author_facet |
Antuniassi,Ulisses R. Velini,Edivaldo D. Oliveira,Rone B. de Peres-Oliveira,Maria A. Figueiredo,Zulema N. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Velini,Edivaldo D. Oliveira,Rone B. de Peres-Oliveira,Maria A. Figueiredo,Zulema N. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antuniassi,Ulisses R. Velini,Edivaldo D. Oliveira,Rone B. de Peres-Oliveira,Maria A. Figueiredo,Zulema N. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
application equipments agricultural aviation fungicides deposits Phakopsora pachyrhizi |
topic |
application equipments agricultural aviation fungicides deposits Phakopsora pachyrhizi |
description |
The soybean rust caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi is considered the main soybean disease and consequently the appropriate selection and the use of spraying equipment are vital for its control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of aerial application equipment for soybean rust control. It was used: Micronair AU 5000 at 10 L ha-1 (with oil) and at 20 L ha-1 (without oil); Stol ARD atomizer at 10 and 20 L ha-1 (both with oil) and Spectrum (electrostatic) at 10 L ha-1 (without oil). The adjuvant was cotton oil (1.0 L ha-1) with emulsifier (BR 455) at 0.025 L ha-1. The field trial was set up at the 3rd fungicide application, when f four replications of each treatment. There were no statistical differences among treatments related to fungicide deposits by at a Confidence Interval of 95%. It was observed that the best results were obtained with Micronair (10 L ha-1 with oil), Stol (20 L ha-1 with oil) and electrostatic system at 10 L ha-1 with the lowest relative humidity (64%). |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400008 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-69162011000400008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.4 2011 reponame:Engenharia Agrícola instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) instacron:SBEA |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
instacron_str |
SBEA |
institution |
SBEA |
reponame_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
collection |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126270339022848 |